Skip to comments.
U.S. Officials Misread Economic Warfare
TradeAlert.org ^
| Tuesday, September 02, 2003
| William R. Hawkins
Posted on 09/03/2003 1:58:43 PM PDT by Willie Green
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
To: .cnI redruM
You evidently did not read the article.
The concept of "war" is certainly not limited to guns and ammo--and, when you think about it, it's really one of the underlying theses in the area of "marketing."
The purpose of "marketing" is to take away a profitable 'territory' from a competitor--whether it's teeny-boppers/clothing, or the Lincoln/Caddy conflict.
The Red Chinese (among others) figured out that a significant dislocation of workers and professionals in the USA WILL have a significant impact on the strength of the country, both monetarily and in will/resolve. It certainly is not making Bush's job any easier, is it?
The fact that the Fed and State Gummints in this country made it easier is very significant, as you point out.
But it does NOT change the basics on the thesis that this writer proposes: there's a war, and we are losing.
21
posted on
09/06/2003 6:37:12 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Democrats make mistakes. RINOs don't correct them.--Chesterton (adapted by Ninenot))
To: templar
"More buggy whips! We don't want this kind of industry in the U.S.!"
So what industries would be worth saving in this country (US)?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson