Skip to comments.
What is Wal-Mart Trying To Hide?
Kansas Workbeat ^
Posted on 09/01/2003 6:10:56 AM PDT by StatesEnemy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-130 next last
To: lewislynn
I think it is called the proloteriat
101
posted on
09/01/2003 9:11:25 AM PDT
by
Porterville
(I spell stuff wrong, get over it, you are not that great.)
To: Dane
Absolutely right. I used to go through that miserable untangling of Christmas tree lghts, looking for the bad bulb, and trying to replace it without ruining the little wire prongs (a task that usually required several beers). Also, we used to re-use the outdoor lights for years (not a safe practice, especially in a severe Northern climate like Alaska, where insulation cracks so easily).
Now I go to WAL-MART or COSTCO and buy new lights- right AFTER Christmas, and put them away for next year.
Only one example of a product that is much more affordable with "free trade".
102
posted on
09/01/2003 9:11:38 AM PDT
by
RANGERAIRBORNE
("Oderint dum metuant" -CALIGULA)
To: kittymyrib
Start planning NOW to avoid contributing to the Chinese army that owns the shipping company that transports Walmart's inventory this Christmas. Well said. I always try to buy American or just do without. Now if I can just get the wife to go along with the program.
Sad to say that Christmas has become nothing more than "Christians buying stuff from Non-Christians".
103
posted on
09/01/2003 9:27:54 AM PDT
by
Missouri
(Everything for the Republic, nothing for those who oppose the Republic)
To: mrfixit514
I emailed Wal-Mart about their domestic partner policy and about the fact that they are selling Hilary's book and not Ann Coulter's.
I went to walmart.com and found Ann Coulter's "Treason" available for purchase.
Also, there was a post this week about Wal-Mart.com selling a book that encourages pedophilia. I think Wal-Mart has some explaining to do.
That was amazon.com. Now you have some explaining to do.
104
posted on
09/01/2003 9:29:19 AM PDT
by
cashion
To: TomGuy; Chancellor Palpatine
I'm just curious--how long has it been since you had to LIVE on minimum wage? How long since you even had to live on $5.35 an hour? I would bet the difference that you are making much more than $5.35 an hour. Well whose fault is THAT?!? I don't make minimum wage because I don't want to. My grandparents made much less at one point, but as opposed to sitting around and whining about things like you do, they changed that. Instead of complaining, if you are worried about what you make, I suggest you change that as well.
105
posted on
09/01/2003 9:39:03 AM PDT
by
Texas_Dawg
(Little man? I don't even care about the upper-middle class.)
To: Dog Gone
Why isn't that a true statement?
I notice you convienently left off the 2nd half of my post where I said that they would spend the saved money on more goods from China or illegal immigrant labor.
106
posted on
09/01/2003 9:39:42 AM PDT
by
lelio
To: kittymyrib
Start planning NOW to avoid contributing to the Chinese army that owns the shipping company that transports Walmart's inventory this Christmas.Yes indeed.
To: RJL
This whole story is a contradiction. The first three paragraphs tell us that its virtually impossible to find out even where Wal-mart buys their merchandise Even the President of the United States could not find out from Wal-Mart where it manufactures its goods. Then they go on to tell us exactly where the merchandise is made, who makes it, how much they are paid, what they eat, where they sleep, and on and on
Excellent observation. We, myself included, argue the finer points of a story that appears to be unsubstantiated based on its own content.
108
posted on
09/01/2003 9:43:36 AM PDT
by
meyer
To: lelio
I conveniently left that off because you don't know what they'll spend the money on. If you're trying to assert the second part of your statement as fact instead of hot air, I'd request that you back it up.
Otherwise, the first part of your statement is the only substantive part.
To: Freedom4US
The "expert" economists so far have remained mute on this aspect, a $50 VCR seems cheap, until the social costs of divorce, meth-fueled burglary and a bunch of other nasty by-products of a "post industrial" society are factored in.The societal ills you mention aren't related to a "post-industrial" society; they are related to a liberal upbringing and socialistic teachings.
110
posted on
09/01/2003 9:51:08 AM PDT
by
meyer
To: Kay Ludlow
I wonder how the "Free Traders" would feel if our defense industry left for lower wages in Communist China? Those new black berets that the military wears now were made in China.
To: PuNcH
*that had to be one of the most stupid damn arguments i've heard in a long time*Well, at least you read the post!
Did you bother reading the rant?
To: StatesEnemy
Walmart will soon go the way of Kmart.
I would rather spend 20% more on an item then fight their horrendous parking, narrow isles, crummy service and twenty minute check out stands.
113
posted on
09/01/2003 12:51:57 PM PDT
by
Kay Soze
(Free Republic- gathering place for "go along to get along Republicans" & a few Conservatives.)
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
Also, we used to re-use the outdoor lights for years (not a safe practice, especially in a severe Northern climate like Alaska, where insulation cracks so easily). Now I go to WAL-MART or COSTCO and buy new lights- right AFTER Christmas, and put them away for next year.
Only one example of a product that is much more affordable with "free trade".
And that doesn't strike you as a porcine example of wastefulness (the opposite of conservatism BTW)?
Imagine a quality US manufactured set of LED based X-Mass lights that require an initial $20 investment but last 20 years.
To: StatesEnemy
Well, yeah, probably. But it's my money.
115
posted on
09/01/2003 2:01:10 PM PDT
by
RANGERAIRBORNE
("If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's FREE!")
To: StatesEnemy
And that doesn't strike you as a porcine example of wastefulness (the opposite of conservatism BTW)? Imagine a quality US manufactured set of LED based X-Mass lights that require an initial $20 investment but last 20 years
Ping me when you find a set. Like I stated before I used to dread the day after Thanksgiving, when the Christmas decorations went up. Looking through thousands of lights to find the "bad" one.
BTW, SE, why don't you start up your own company and make such an infallible set of lights as you stated in your above italicized passage.
Surely, you, the truest of truest Americans, could make such a dream come true.
A $20 set of Christmas lights that will last for 20 years.
116
posted on
09/01/2003 2:09:12 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: Dane
Actually, after I wrote that I realized what a good idea it is.
A perfect application for LEDs.
To: Dane
To: StatesEnemy
OK, it'll cost you $29.95 Is there an absolute guarantee, they will last 20 years?
Also do they have clear lights, and not as big, for outdoor use?
Heck if I pay $2 for a roll of 100 lights at my local K-Mart or Wal-Mart, which are in stock and no waiting for the mailman or UPS man, what is the advantage of going with your suggestion, other than feeling superior and overloading an already overloaded mail system which has personal and petinent gifts in the pipeline, while I wait for the "quality" lights.
119
posted on
09/01/2003 3:09:18 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: StatesEnemy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-130 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson