Skip to comments.
Nearly half of Americans wouldn't vote for Bush again
AFP ^
| 08-23-03
Posted on 08/23/2003 4:31:16 PM PDT by Brian S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181 next last
To: Tacis
I know. Polls are only as good as their results...
I only hope that the White House is not dismissing the bad ones and hanging on to only the good ones.
41
posted on
08/23/2003 5:00:14 PM PDT
by
Brian S
To: Timesink
This is a classic polling/reporting trick. Exactly. Many of those would "rather" have Ronald Reagan, or George Washington, or me. Mostly me.
42
posted on
08/23/2003 5:01:58 PM PDT
by
KayEyeDoubleDee
(const tag& thisTagWontChange)
To: Burkeman1
But what about Nader? Is he running again?Not as of yet. But he hasn't ruled it out, and the Green Party is on record as saying it hates the Democratic Party so much (for not being left-wing enough) that they would be ecstatic to run Nader again, or anyone at all, who would draw enough votes to destroy the RAT candidates's chances in 2004.
And make no mistake: If Nader gets back into the race, or the Greens can find anyone with the slightest bit of political persuasiveness, the RATS' chances of recapturing the White House in 2004 will be zero.
43
posted on
08/23/2003 5:03:14 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: Brian S
jobs, iraq and taxes
To: kms61
Roy Moore? Who is he? I have never heard of him?
45
posted on
08/23/2003 5:05:31 PM PDT
by
Burkeman1
((If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.))
To: Brian S
49 percent -- would not want Bush Well,.. then, ..There is no change from the first vote that put Bush in office.
46
posted on
08/23/2003 5:06:46 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
To: sf4dubya
Exactly -- and Republicans need to hammer the Dims on that question over and over again. "What's your plan to stimulate the economy, if you hate our ideals so much? Let's see it!" Which is precisely what the Bush campaign will do next year (assuming it's even necessary; personally, I think the economy will be in full recovery mode by then). Then, the moment the Anointed RAT has his Walter Mondale moment ("Mr. Bush will raise taxes, and so will I. He won't tell you. I just did."), that'll pretty much wrap things up, and Karl Rove can take an early vacation in October.
47
posted on
08/23/2003 5:07:42 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: Brian S
Disclaimer: I did not place nor bump this thread up into "Breaking News". I hold that category sacred for true "Breaking" news.
48
posted on
08/23/2003 5:09:00 PM PDT
by
Brian S
To: Timesink
But when you pair the same elected official against the actual human beings that are fighting to challenge said politician in the next election, the percentage of people choosing that specific Somebody Else drops sharply. That's quite an assumption. I thought Mondale and Dukakis were robots.
49
posted on
08/23/2003 5:09:05 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: Brian S
Nearly half of Americans wouldn't vote for Bush againSo? Nearly half didn't vote for him before.
Keep the more than half, and he's in.
50
posted on
08/23/2003 5:09:41 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifer lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: aimhigh
Well,.. then, ..There is no change from the first vote that put Bush in office.
Correct.....
George Walker Bush Richard Bruce CheneyParty: REPUBLICAN Home State: PR: TX; VP: WY Electoral Votes: 271 Pop. Vote: 50,461,092 (47.9%) |
Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. Joseph Isador LiebermanParty: DEMOCRATIC Home State: PR: TN; VP: CT Electoral Votes: 266 Pop. Vote: 50,994,086 (48.4% |
51
posted on
08/23/2003 5:11:04 PM PDT
by
deport
(OCT 7, it cometh too soon for some... ARNOLD has the heavy MOJO)
To: Fraulein
""I like it. It's beautiful. There is so much information I can get," Abdullah said, surrounded by U.S. soldiers and commanders who crammed the one-room Internet cafe they had helped set up with $24,000 from the 4th Infantry Division's budget."
Unfettered Internet Access Comes to Tikrit
Richard W.
52
posted on
08/23/2003 5:11:09 PM PDT
by
arete
(Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
To: Brian S
Should be under Weak News from Newsweek
53
posted on
08/23/2003 5:11:31 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: Brian S
This is a dumb poll. It is not registered voters. It is not likely voters it is just Americans. It does not show how Dubya would do against a democrat candidate. This is a poll of Dubya against the nameless faceless dream candidate of the great unwashed American masses and Dubya almosts beats their dream candidate.
54
posted on
08/23/2003 5:11:48 PM PDT
by
Once-Ler
(Proud Republican and Bushbot)
To: Brian S
Newsweek has no credibility with me....I remember their polls used to always show lower numbers when the question was about President Bush....they were consistently lower than anyone else when Bush became our President...usually by several points.
55
posted on
08/23/2003 5:11:50 PM PDT
by
ruoflaw
To: Timesink
As an aside. Does anyone else think that the Perot put up was a Clinton black bag operation both times? The guy had no clear platform other than "reform" and wasn't his company rewarded both times with nice government contracts by Clinton?
56
posted on
08/23/2003 5:11:53 PM PDT
by
Burkeman1
((If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.))
To: Paleo Conservative
57
posted on
08/23/2003 5:12:43 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: Brian S; Once-Ler
My bad it was registered voters.
58
posted on
08/23/2003 5:13:10 PM PDT
by
Once-Ler
(Proud Republican and Bushbot)
To: Brian S
Some 57 percent said they prefered Bush's position on terrorism to 21 who prefered the Democrats. Two mispellings of the same word tells me we have a suspect foreign -- and biased -- source.
To: dogbyte12
When 3,000,000 more people are out of work, it's hard to tell them in the midst of another layoff of 1,300 at HP, and 1,400 at Boeing, that technically the economy is growing,
As the idiotic unemployment extensions expire more people will go back to work rather than starve waiting for a "good" job.But will it be in time for "W" to get reelected?
60
posted on
08/23/2003 5:13:13 PM PDT
by
edchambers
(Undead Haliburton Zombie Army)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson