Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilly: Calling Al Franken a satirist is a farce
New York Daily News ^ | August 18, 2003 | Bill O'Reilly

Posted on 08/18/2003 8:57:37 AM PDT by Sir Valentino

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Go, Fox, Go!

Franken is *NOT* a satirist and *NOT* a comedian. This is all about *LIBEL* and *CHARACTER ASSASSINATION*.

Let's stop Franken from spreading his *LIBELOUS LIES*.

1 posted on 08/18/2003 8:57:37 AM PDT by Sir Valentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
I think the suit against Franken is ill-advised, chiefly because it will only give his book more attention. Bot BOR makes a good point that Franken's aim is not satire, but political ideology.
2 posted on 08/18/2003 9:01:12 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
Calling Al Franken a satirist is satire.
3 posted on 08/18/2003 9:01:54 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
On radio this weekend, a reporter related O'Reilly's most outrageous lie so far. He has been claiming for the past year or two that he has always been a registered independent. A reporter checked the voting rolls and discovered that he registered Republican six years ago. When confronted, Bill claimed it was a mistake at the voters office that he couldn't get cleared up. The reporter went back out again and discovered that Bill had never requested that the registration be changed and in fact had voted three times as a REpublican since then. If he's a Republican, he should be proud, and if he has a brain, he should know that he would be caught if he lied. After claiming a Peabody award several times, and then having to admit that it was a much lesser Polk award, Bill is soon going to have some 'splaining to do, Lucy. His nose is growing. EVen if Franken is a sack of crap, Bill's lies make Franken look correct in this case.
--Raoul
4 posted on 08/18/2003 9:03:01 AM PDT by RDangerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
A surprisingly eloquent article, I thought, given the source.
5 posted on 08/18/2003 9:04:57 AM PDT by PianoMan (Ignore anything I post after midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Historically, political ideology has been behind much parody and satire.

O'Reilly is acting like a child here.
6 posted on 08/18/2003 9:05:13 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
Franken is a drug addled brain melt.
7 posted on 08/18/2003 9:05:39 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
Franken and O'Rielly are evil clones. They sue and harass one another to drive up their own ratings. It's not shame, it's publicity. Who would have baught that man's drivel without O'Rielly to flog it for him?
8 posted on 08/18/2003 9:05:42 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
Al Franken is to comedy what Michael Moore is to documentary filmmaking.
9 posted on 08/18/2003 9:09:12 AM PDT by George Smiley (Is the RKBA still a right if you have to get the government's permission before you can exercise it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Bill O'Reilly:

10 posted on 08/18/2003 9:13:20 AM PDT by CMClay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
Let's stop Franken from spreading his *LIBELOUS LIES*.

Well, we cannot quite do that. The First Amendment allows freedom of speech, even if that speech lies (defamation being another matter entirely).

But what we CAN do, is point out his lies and rebut them.

11 posted on 08/18/2003 9:14:14 AM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Do you really think that just anyone should be able to print the words "fair and balanced" without permission from the Fox network?
12 posted on 08/18/2003 9:16:24 AM PDT by Scenic Sounds (All roads lead to reality. That's why I smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
the suit against Franken is ill-advised, chiefly because it will only give his book more attention

So what if it does? If he loses the suit, he still loses. And thats the whole idea.

13 posted on 08/18/2003 9:17:10 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Ann Coulter refered to that witch Katie Couric as "Eva Braun."

Katie is not Eva.

Should Ann be sued?

No!

O'Reilly is abusing the process to stroke his own fragile ego.
14 posted on 08/18/2003 9:17:23 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
Fox is a conservative network, which I have no problem with. It is not conservative as many claim it is, but it does lean right.

I think the lawsuit is a joke. This is clearly fueled by O'Reilly
15 posted on 08/18/2003 9:17:29 AM PDT by luckydevi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
Franken can't make money by himself; he needs to ride the coattails of others (Rush, BOR) to sell books. The fact that he has to resort to wisecracks whenever he debates shows that he is incapable of any intellectual thought.
16 posted on 08/18/2003 9:18:00 AM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
Franken is a dork....what difference does it make if he is referred to as a satirist or a comedian? If he were witty and charming with an incisive wit would that make him any more palatable?
17 posted on 08/18/2003 9:19:29 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
"Fair use" allows such use in parody and satire.

Watch SNL or Mad TV. Do you think they need permission from the very people they are making fun of?
18 posted on 08/18/2003 9:19:46 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
What's new?

It's funny that the Daily News is being used by O'Reilly to promote the Murdoch media. It's former owner - the old crook, Robert Maxwell - would turn in his grave - if he wasn't so fat.

19 posted on 08/18/2003 9:20:50 AM PDT by jjbrouwer (Whaddyou talkin' about, Terminator?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Do you really think that just anyone should be able to print the words "fair and balanced" without permission from the Fox network?

Depends. Does the party intend to use it as a tag phrase to sell something?

Do you think New Balance sneakers would go very far if they started advertising their product with the phrase "Just Do It."?

20 posted on 08/18/2003 9:20:53 AM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson