Skip to comments.
Bill O'Reilly: Calling Al Franken a satirist is a farce
New York Daily News ^
| August 18, 2003
| Bill O'Reilly
Posted on 08/18/2003 8:57:37 AM PDT by Sir Valentino
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Go, Fox, Go!
Franken is *NOT* a satirist and *NOT* a comedian. This is all about *LIBEL* and *CHARACTER ASSASSINATION*.
Let's stop Franken from spreading his *LIBELOUS LIES*.
To: Sir Valentino
I think the suit against Franken is ill-advised, chiefly because it will only give his book more attention. Bot BOR makes a good point that Franken's aim is not satire, but political ideology.
To: Sir Valentino
Calling Al Franken a satirist is satire.
3
posted on
08/18/2003 9:01:54 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Sir Valentino
On radio this weekend, a reporter related O'Reilly's most outrageous lie so far. He has been claiming for the past year or two that he has always been a registered independent. A reporter checked the voting rolls and discovered that he registered Republican six years ago. When confronted, Bill claimed it was a mistake at the voters office that he couldn't get cleared up. The reporter went back out again and discovered that Bill had never requested that the registration be changed and in fact had voted three times as a REpublican since then. If he's a Republican, he should be proud, and if he has a brain, he should know that he would be caught if he lied. After claiming a Peabody award several times, and then having to admit that it was a much lesser Polk award, Bill is soon going to have some 'splaining to do, Lucy. His nose is growing. EVen if Franken is a sack of crap, Bill's lies make Franken look correct in this case.
--Raoul
To: Sir Valentino
A surprisingly eloquent article, I thought, given the source.
5
posted on
08/18/2003 9:04:57 AM PDT
by
PianoMan
(Ignore anything I post after midnight)
To: over3Owithabrain
Historically, political ideology has been behind much parody and satire.
O'Reilly is acting like a child here.
To: Sir Valentino
Franken is a drug addled brain melt.
7
posted on
08/18/2003 9:05:39 AM PDT
by
tallhappy
To: Sir Valentino
Franken and O'Rielly are evil clones. They sue and harass one another to drive up their own ratings. It's not shame, it's publicity. Who would have baught that man's drivel without O'Rielly to flog it for him?
8
posted on
08/18/2003 9:05:42 AM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
("any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke)
To: Sir Valentino
Al Franken is to comedy what Michael Moore is to documentary filmmaking.
9
posted on
08/18/2003 9:09:12 AM PDT
by
George Smiley
(Is the RKBA still a right if you have to get the government's permission before you can exercise it?)
To: over3Owithabrain
Bill O'Reilly:
10
posted on
08/18/2003 9:13:20 AM PDT
by
CMClay
To: Sir Valentino
Let's stop Franken from spreading his *LIBELOUS LIES*.Well, we cannot quite do that. The First Amendment allows freedom of speech, even if that speech lies (defamation being another matter entirely).
But what we CAN do, is point out his lies and rebut them.
11
posted on
08/18/2003 9:14:14 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: Lazamataz
Do you really think that just anyone should be able to print the words "fair and balanced" without permission from the Fox network?
12
posted on
08/18/2003 9:16:24 AM PDT
by
Scenic Sounds
(All roads lead to reality. That's why I smile.)
To: over3Owithabrain
the suit against Franken is ill-advised, chiefly because it will only give his book more attentionSo what if it does? If he loses the suit, he still loses. And thats the whole idea.
To: Lazamataz
Ann Coulter refered to that witch Katie Couric as "Eva Braun."
Katie is not Eva.
Should Ann be sued?
No!
O'Reilly is abusing the process to stroke his own fragile ego.
To: Sir Valentino
Fox is a conservative network, which I have no problem with. It is not conservative as many claim it is, but it does lean right.
I think the lawsuit is a joke. This is clearly fueled by O'Reilly
To: Sir Valentino
Franken can't make money by himself; he needs to ride the coattails of others (Rush, BOR) to sell books. The fact that he has to resort to wisecracks whenever he debates shows that he is incapable of any intellectual thought.
To: Sir Valentino
Franken is a dork....what difference does it make if he is referred to as a satirist or a comedian? If he were witty and charming with an incisive wit would that make him any more palatable?
To: Scenic Sounds
"Fair use" allows such use in parody and satire.
Watch SNL or Mad TV. Do you think they need permission from the very people they are making fun of?
To: Bluntpoint
What's new?
It's funny that the Daily News is being used by O'Reilly to promote the Murdoch media. It's former owner - the old crook, Robert Maxwell - would turn in his grave - if he wasn't so fat.
19
posted on
08/18/2003 9:20:50 AM PDT
by
jjbrouwer
(Whaddyou talkin' about, Terminator?)
To: Scenic Sounds
Do you really think that just anyone should be able to print the words "fair and balanced" without permission from the Fox network?Depends. Does the party intend to use it as a tag phrase to sell something?
Do you think New Balance sneakers would go very far if they started advertising their product with the phrase "Just Do It."?
20
posted on
08/18/2003 9:20:53 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson