Skip to comments.
Tancredo calls illegal immigration threat to U.S.
gjsentinel ^
| 08.16.03
| GARY HARMON
Posted on 08/16/2003 7:09:51 PM PDT by VU4G10
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: ArneFufkin
We must live in the same town - are you in Northern Virginia?
41
posted on
08/16/2003 10:14:29 PM PDT
by
satan
To: Luis Gonzalez
Hey, I just received via UPS my "Tell Me More" Language Learning software to study Spanish!!! They can't tell us apart now, wait for a year or so! My UPS guy is from Dominican Republic, and I told him what it was and said "Gracias", and he grabbed it back and said, "you don't need this, you've got it down"
Actually, my only motivation in learning Spanish is to find out if the bodacious models on Univision are as smart as they are fetching.
To: satan
Minneapolis, MN.
To: Luis Gonzalez
We may all be just one individual. Arator.
To: ETERNAL WARMING
I didn't see ANY bills that made it to the floor. What were the vote counts?
To: ArneFufkin
"Actually, my only motivation in learning Spanish is to find out if the bodacious models on Univision are as smart as they are fetching."I'm pretty impressed that you've looked that high. I didn't even know that they had a head.
46
posted on
08/16/2003 10:28:58 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
(I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together)
To: dagnabbit
What have you done?
Tell me about the specific entitlement rules and policies regarding the enrollment of illegally resident foreign nationals in your county. What's the policy, what are the numbers of enrollees, what are the costs and by what authority do they provide these benefits.
I'm interested to see what your knowledge of YOUR backyard is.
To: dagnabbit
What have you done?
Tell me about the specific entitlement rules and policies regarding the enrollment of illegally resident foreign nationals in your county. What's the policy, what are the numbers of enrollees, what are the costs and by what authority do they provide these benefits.
I'm interested to see what your knowledge of YOUR backyard is.
To: VU4G10
Could this actually be, pardon my french, a politician with some balls? Lets hope the PC crowd doesn't get to him, and buy him off, if he does have a pair.
49
posted on
08/16/2003 10:32:04 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: ETERNAL WARMING
Employer sanctions are the most effective way to stop "regular" illegal immigration. Additional border and port-of-entry controls are also needed, however, to complement employer sanctions and to thwart intending criminal and terrorist illegals who may not ever have (formal) U.S. employers.
Don't expect much of this, of course, under the current President.
50
posted on
08/16/2003 10:36:30 PM PDT
by
dagnabbit
(Shielding Guilty Saudis = Accessory After the Fact.)
To: dagnabbit
Don't expect much of this, of course, under the current President. What exactly would you have the President do, given his Executive Branch authority? Specifically.
To: dagnabbit
Friend, don't feed the trolls. Don't feed the trolls. Don't feed the trolls. IGNORE ALL TROLLS ON THE IMMIGRATION THREADS.
DO NOT FEED THEM. DO NOT ANSWER THEM. DO NOT LET THEM TRIGGER YOU TO "PROVE" ANYTHING!
DO NOT LET THAT HAPPEN!
This is a friendly reminder.
52
posted on
08/16/2003 11:02:51 PM PDT
by
I_Love_My_Husband
(to the trolls: I can't hear you lalalalala! :)
To: =Intervention=
Those aren't bills, they're floor amendments to FINAL APPROPRIATION bills. They're empty showboating. There's no work or serious intent there, nobody is going to pass a new program or interpretation of immigration law that has not been funded, marked or had a hearing on a Final Reading of an Appropriation bill! He's a joke. If he was a serious professional, he'd have lobbied Debbie Pryce or Ralph Regula or another "Cardinal" prior to the markup, where his initiative could be examined for relevancy, funding rationale and acceptability to 218 members. That's how you do it, only jacknobs from the Minority Caucus throw these Amendments at the final reading, they don't have access to the Ranking majority members to market their change. Tancredo's a showboating bozo.
To: I_Love_My_Husband
If you think I'm going let ignorant and disingenous posters use immigration threads to bash George Bush without a ready alternative approach and action plan ... NO SOUP FOR YOU!
So, what is the specific set of actions George W. Bush should take TOMORROW to solve this immigration challenge to your satisfaction? Step by step, with well considered resources, and a realistic chance of implementation and success.
If you don't have an answer, you don't have STANDING to criticize the President. If you are here as a pretext to slam Bush, that's fraudulent and you aren't Free Republic material.
To: ArneFufkin
Whether local jurisdictions give my tax dollars to illegal aliens is just icing on the cake. The ongoing cultural balkanization, public safety degradation, and general importation of poverty would still take place so long as large numbers of legal and illegal aliens are here in huge numbers, courtesy of a federal goverment AWOL on the issue.
BTW, my "county" the District of Columbia, gives all manner of benefits to aliens, legal and illegal. It does so because it's voter demographics, like those of immigration meccas NY and CA, all but preclude conservative, common-sense politics and practices.
55
posted on
08/16/2003 11:26:10 PM PDT
by
dagnabbit
(Shielding Guilty Saudis = Accessory After the Fact.)
To: ArneFufkin
I have to go to bed now, will you please ping me when TF responds to your post?
You would have thought that after all this time, he would have had this whole thing written down someplace.
How are the Vikes going to do this year?
56
posted on
08/16/2003 11:27:28 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
(I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together)
To: ArneFufkin
Tell me about the illegal Russians in Brighton Beach, the Jamaicans in Brooklyn, the Greeks in Chicago and the Somali in Minneapolis. They've snuck in too.I don't think that the number of Russian, Jamaican, Greek, or Somali illegal aliens in the United States even comes close to matching the number of Mexican illegal aliens in the United States.
57
posted on
08/16/2003 11:29:36 PM PDT
by
usadave
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Thanks. There are always a few of the same 'bots who can't seem to resist immigration threads as an opportunity to deny the obvious, that their man isn't a conservative on the issue. It would be like me popping up daily on the "prayer for Bush", "day in the life of" or whatever other Bush-genuflection threads are going, just to offer my contrary view on the chief executive.
58
posted on
08/16/2003 11:41:20 PM PDT
by
dagnabbit
(Shielding Guilty Saudis = Accessory After the Fact.)
To: dagnabbit
You're not the arbiter of who is "qualified" by language, national origin, religion or race to be an American. There was a day when your ancestor dragged his raggedy ass immigrant self off the boat, and the locals didn't much care for him either.
There is no obligation, moral or otherwise, to abide foreign nationals who come here with no productive skill, means of self support or capability to contribute to the benefit of the larger American family. They need to find a sponsor or return to their homeland.
There is no limit to the number of honest, hard working, productive and inspired individuals that are welcome in America. No limit, ever. We've got room for hundreds of millions more. Every new producer moves the American juggernaut along our God blessed path of freedom and well being.
That's an inexorable destiny, pal, better folks than you and me are coming our way, and they might be dark skinned, cook strange odored food, speak foreign languages and worship in their own place and ways.
In 40 years, there'll be forum where Americans of Mexican heritage will be bitching about the surge of Trinidaddios and Tobagoneers taking their jobs and not assimilating into American culture.
To: dagnabbit
just to offer my contrary view on the chief executive You can't defend your objection. Again, what would Tom Tancredo, given his executive branch powers, do TOMORROW if he were the President?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson