Skip to comments.
Highly Covert U.S.-Thai Operation Nabbed Hambali
Yahoo ^
Posted on 08/15/2003 11:00:00 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Sub-Driver
HA! The lib's can't whine about not being informed so they can blab, and by the very context of the report, they were definantly left out of the loop.
This just oozes Bsh/Chny.
HA!
2
posted on
08/15/2003 11:05:32 AM PDT
by
TLI
(...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
To: Sub-Driver
The Thais "kicked down the door..."
They must have brought stepladders.
To: Sub-Driver
You mean we've finally hired people who can keep things covert? Progress!
4
posted on
08/15/2003 11:16:03 AM PDT
by
sarasota
To: TLI; Sub-Driver; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; blam; Sabertooth; NormsRevenge; ...
The Bush Doctrine at work!!!!!
Bush Doctrine Unfolds :
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below: |
|
click here >>> |
Bush Doctrine Unfold |
<<< click here |
|
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
5
posted on
08/15/2003 11:33:36 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I love it.
6
posted on
08/15/2003 11:40:16 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
I feel safer!
7
posted on
08/15/2003 11:42:21 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
To: *Far East
To: Sub-Driver
Now, if only we could get Shinawatra to stop being such a pro PRC bootlicker and to stop ragging on us for Operation Iraqi Freedom. It's a good start, though....
9
posted on
08/15/2003 12:05:25 PM PDT
by
GOP_1900AD
(Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
To: belmont_mark
Frank Shinawatra?
To: Sub-Driver; PhilDragoo; BOBTHENAILER; ClancyJ; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog; Dog Gone; hchutch; ...
If the rats in congress had their way, we would never read about another success like this.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/963089/posts Congress to restrict use of Special Ops (The full story not just a teaser on Drudge!)
Washington Times ^ | 8/13/2003 | Bill Gertz
Posted on 08/12/2003 10:31 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
Congress to restrict use of Special Ops
By Bill Gertz THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Congress is set to impose new restrictions on the use of Special Operations Forces that for the first time will require a presidential order before deploying commandos in routine but hidden activities.
The restrictions are contained in the classified Senate report accompanying the current version of the intelligence authorization bill for fiscal 2004.
11
posted on
08/15/2003 12:12:16 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Gray Davis = Bill Clinton without the conscience + Al Gore without the charm = Total Recall Time!)
To: Sub-Driver
No congressional approval given here.
THAT'S WHY IT WORKED!!!!
12
posted on
08/15/2003 12:12:56 PM PDT
by
Only1choice____Freedom
(If everything you experienced, believed, lived was a lie, would you want to know the truth?)
To: Sub-Driver
""We received tipoffs from local people that there were strange-looking people..."Aren't they all?
13
posted on
08/15/2003 12:48:19 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Grampa Dave
Thanks for the ping, Grampa Dave.
I think you can count out restrictions on Spc Ops:
Pentagon Town Hall Meeting - Thurs., Aug. 14, 2003
Q:...Part B was an article I saw in the -- I think the Times yesterday that talked about constraining the operations of our Special Operations Forces; that a presidential order would, perhaps, have to be in place. Comments, please.
Rumsfeld: I checked into that article that was in some newspaper, and at least thus far, I'm told that it's not accurate. That is to say that the -- we do not believe there is a constraint that's operative at the present time. It's complicated, because it involves two senatorial committees, and -- I was not in any of the meetings, and there is nothing in the law that constrains us and -- beyond where we're currently constrained, and obviously, there are constraints, and we live within them, and that's fine. But the implication in the article was that there was some new constraint that would inhibit the special operators from being capable of doing the kinds of things they've been doing in the past. And I'm told in discussions with the Armed Services Committee that that's not the case; that there was some side language in a report in the Intel Committee that suggested that, but the Armed Services Committee seems not to think that's a problem, and I certainly hope that's the case.
And if it's not the case, we would have to have more discussions and figure out how we sort it out, because the -- in the global war on terror and the kind of an environment we're in, the security environment we're in, there is no question but that the Special Operations people have been utilized to a much greater extent than previously and undoubtedly will be prospectively.
IOW - no way, Jose. (^:
14
posted on
08/15/2003 12:59:53 PM PDT
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
(SUPPORT OUR TROOPS RALLY* MELBOURNE, FL*8/17: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/964625/posts)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl; PhilDragoo; ClancyJ
RC, thanks for posting this Rummy straight Talk.
Well, either an assistant to Rummy is in real trouble or Gertz is starting to act like he is a writer for the Ny Slimes.
I think that Gertz wanted this covert operation by the rats to kill our covert Spec Ops out in the open. Any rat in Congress, associated with this, is yesterday's news in their next election.
15
posted on
08/15/2003 1:04:16 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Gray Davis = Bill Clinton without the conscience + Al Gore without the charm = Total Recall Time!)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
You don't think a Thai can kick?
16
posted on
08/15/2003 1:06:47 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
("No Comment.")
To: Grampa Dave
I'm glad he brought it up, GD. Put the spotlight on the Senate where there are many working against the DoD and our war efforts. Perhaps people will start paying attention to the Senate Foreign Relations and Intel Committees.
Our Senators seem to think their constituents are all unhappy parents of miserable troops.
17
posted on
08/15/2003 1:15:14 PM PDT
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
(SUPPORT OUR TROOPS RALLY* MELBOURNE, FL*8/17: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/964625/posts)
To: ASA Vet
No question.
But most Thais I've met are 4' 10"...
To: Eric in the Ozarks
My wife is 5'5" and 100% Thai
19
posted on
08/15/2003 1:29:28 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
("No Comment.")
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Oh, I forgot to mention she can't kick....
I've offered to teach her, but she's not interested.
20
posted on
08/15/2003 1:31:34 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
("No Comment.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson