Skip to comments.
The Marriage Strike
ifeminists.com / Fox News ^
| August 12, 2003
| Wendy McElroy
Posted on 08/12/2003 8:31:25 PM PDT by buzzyboop
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:36:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: xzins
On that, we totally agree.
To: xzins
"I don't get the divorces, I don't get the unwed mothering, I don't get the unwed fathering."
Laws, especially a few laws passed during the Clinton
Administration, make getting married or cohabiting
actually dangerous for men (e.g., the VAWA, Child
Support Act,...). Accusations alone (no evidence,
no credible testimony) can imprison them.
The opposition doesn't know it, yet, but feminism is
through. It's over--all of it.
22
posted on
08/13/2003 2:26:58 AM PDT
by
familyop
(Essayons.)
To: buzzyboop
23
posted on
08/13/2003 2:31:43 AM PDT
by
familyop
(Essayons.)
To: chookter
If he just doesn't marry her, he can see the kid pretty much whenever he wants..
Most unmarried fathers have little or no interest in their offspring and, as a rule, won't or can't pay child support. The majority of divorced fathers do pay child support, especially if they regularly see their kids.
To: RLK
The "purpose" of sex is to serve as an impediment to reproduction.
25
posted on
08/13/2003 5:43:47 AM PDT
by
Rudder
To: buzzyboop
Why are men reluctant to marry? The Rutgers report admittedly based on a small sample found ten prevalent reasons. The first three: They can get sex without marriage;
Thy can enjoy "a wife" through cohabitation; and,
They want to avoid divorce and its financial risks.
They had a really bad experience last time. Although the good times were excellent, they were too short and too easily discarded by the partner.
I won't be marrying again. Marriage implies trust and I absolutely will never EVER trust anyone to be there.
26
posted on
08/13/2003 5:47:48 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: ccmay
We have been through the wringer together in years gone by and toughed it out.That would be the key to success. Since I didn't and won't find a woman like that, I think I'll just remain single thankyoovurramuch.
27
posted on
08/13/2003 5:51:27 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: ableChair
The feminists have told women that it is the ultimate expression of their liberation to be used, abused and discarded by men. The sexual revolution was a dream come true for horny, shallow men (ok ladies, don't tell me I'm being redundant). Gloria Steinem has done more damage to women than Hugh Hefner could in ten lifetimes.
I read a list once of the ten secrets of happiness, and secret number one said that 99% of a person's happiness is determined by whom they marry-it's certainly been true for me. (25 years with wife #1)
28
posted on
08/13/2003 6:25:24 AM PDT
by
Spok
To: xzins
What about having them in the control of an unwed single mom makes it more possible for this "loving" guy to see his kids than having them in a divorced arrangement? It doesn't make it more possible. It also doesn't make it less possible. Visitation and custody is determined based on parentage and "best interests of the child" in both cases. Previous marriage or non-marriage does not affect that.
Single moms move, btw.
So do divorced moms.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson