Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vegas rated nation's 'meanest city' for homeless
Las Vegas SUN ^ | August 05, 2003 | Las Vegas SUN

Posted on 08/06/2003 6:28:27 AM PDT by jgrubbs

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: jgrubbs
Vegas rated nation's 'meanest city' for homeless

According to National Coalition for the Homeless

12 Meanest Cities List:

  1. New York, NY
  2. Atlanta, GA
  3. San Francisco, CA
  4. Salt Lake City, UT
  5. Jacksonville, FL
  6. Pontiac, MI
  7. Santa Cruz, CA
  8. Austin, TX
  9. Chicago, IL
  10. Honolulu, HI
  11. Baltimore, MD
  12. Palm Beach County, FL

Meanest State:

  1. California

Ok, where do they show up on the list?  Instead, this seems to be a list for the most hospitable homeless cities and states.
Look at California, homeless capital of the united States.  And which town lists itself at the top as the "Meanest"?  San Francisco.

Interesting also to note that out of these cities, many, like Austin, Honolulu, New York, San Francisco are socialist bastions of their region.

I am truly startled to see Palm Beach County on the map, because Belle Glade's population might as well be homeless considering what kind of toilet that town is.

Their newest August 5th report changes to:

20 Meanest Cities
1. Las Vegas
2. San Francisco
3. New York City
4. Los Angeles
5. Atlanta
6. Cincinnati
7. Key West
8. Austin
9. Orlando
10. New Orleans
11. Sacramento
12. Milwaukee
13. Santa Cruz
14. Miami Beach
15. Jacksonville Beach
16. Hollywood, FL
17. Santa Monica
18. Nashville
19. Honolulu
20. Boulder

Meanest States
1. California
2. Florida

According to this "update", Baltimore, Chicago, Palm Beach County, Pontiac and  Salt Lake City  has gotten downright friendly, or other towns are now cracking down on Homelessness.

Here is my theory.  This list is a shakedown list, a concept pioneered by Jesse Jackson.  Your city shows up on this list, and the blacks and other poverty pimps will start trashing the city until they are paid to remove your town's name from the list.

Percentage of Cities Banning Activities

"Banned" Activities %
Obstruction of Sidewalks/Public Places 89.4
Closure of Particular Public Places 69.1
Loitering in Particular Public Places 55.3
Begging in Particular Public Places 53.2
Urination/Defecation in Public 53.2
Sleeping in Particular Public Places 51.1
"Aggressive" Panhandling 50.0
Camping in Particular Public Places 47.9
Sitting/Lying in Particular Public Places 44.7
Bathing in Public Waters 38.3
Begging City-wide 30.9
Camping City-wide 26.6
Loitering City-wide 19.1
Sleeping City-wide 19.1

Now who here (other than Liberals and Libertarians) have a problem with these cities? 
Personally, I would like to see more cities banning these activities, particularly  "Urination/Defecation in Public"
.

21 posted on 08/06/2003 7:13:22 AM PDT by Dr Warmoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
Maybe Vegas and other nicer cities could send them some. Should be enough to go around to all who want some.
22 posted on 08/06/2003 7:15:21 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: sticker
It won't be long until the socialists of ACLU triumph. They are so far left it is disgusting. They are the the first to interfere automatically with any city that gets in their way, and I predict they will soon dominate the US at every level. They are supported by every lawyer, including the Klintoons. Worse, they are financially supported by the philanthropical, leftist Foundations (Ford-Rockerfeller et al) in the land, Down with the ACLU!
25 posted on 08/06/2003 7:24:58 AM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
Only 53.2% of cities ban Urination/Defecation in Public? You gotta be kidding!

I'd think that many cities fall into either of these two categories: (1) urination and defecation in public is already banned by state law, therefore a city ordinance is unnecessary and duplicitous; or (2) the city is so small (i.e., Lexington, Virginia, population 6,000) that this activity has never been a problem, hence no one has thought to pass legislation banning it.

26 posted on 08/06/2003 7:29:02 AM PDT by dufekin (Eliminate genocidical terrorist miltiary dictator Kim Jong Il now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: FITZ
Drop them off in the desert and make them start a kibbutz.
28 posted on 08/06/2003 9:15:02 AM PDT by Indrid Cold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
The homeless were re-discovered moments after Bush was sworn in as President.

Yeah, they magically got jobs when Klinton seized power after mean-old Reagan/Bush kicked them out of their homes.

29 posted on 08/06/2003 9:17:31 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr Warmoose
SF is second.....LOL
30 posted on 08/06/2003 1:57:42 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: myprecious
It's a vicious cycle. It's the gambling that makes so many homeless. A fool and his money are soon parted or so it goes.
31 posted on 08/06/2003 2:01:27 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson