Skip to comments.
Dead scientist revealed Iraq dirty bomb
Sunday Times ^
| 08/03/03
| Nicholas Rufford
Posted on 08/03/2003 6:30:52 AM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Here's the same article from Newsmax. I like there extra punch lines....
________________________________________________________
Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com
Monday, Aug. 4, 2003
New evidence of Saddam Husseins possession of weapons of mass destruction was provided last June by a top weapons expert, now dead, and it could have an enormous impact on the 2004 presidential election.
The stunning revelation by the British scientist, who committed suicide last month over the issue of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction could have anti-war Democrats running for cover.
41
posted on
08/03/2003 6:15:57 PM PDT
by
ThreePuttinDude
( Iraq's weapons of mass destruction could have anti-war Democrats running for cover)
To: ThreePuttinDude
I like there their extra punch lines
42
posted on
08/03/2003 6:18:11 PM PDT
by
ThreePuttinDude
( Iraq's weapons of mass destruction could have anti-war Democrats running for cover)
To: Pikamax
Are people not forgetting Saddams still living bomb maker -
Hamza?
43
posted on
08/03/2003 7:26:19 PM PDT
by
flamefront
(To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
To: Pikamax
A dirty bomb, plenty scary to me. I guess if you're a manly man like Howard Dean, dirty bombs don't make the WMD grade.
44
posted on
08/03/2003 10:07:07 PM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
("If you think no one cares about you, try skipping next month's car payment" - Daily Zen)
To: Pikamax
bump
45
posted on
08/03/2003 10:30:48 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Pikamax; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER
Thanks for posting this.
Shows the difference between a real newspaper and some left wing phoney baloney news organization like BBC. BBC apparently spike this little bit of data from Kelly in their lies about WMDs .
46
posted on
08/04/2003 8:41:09 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end," said Uday)
To: Grampa Dave
"They (the government) were obviously looking for ways of making the dossier as attractive as they could, and as threatening as they could, and you would have thought Iraq's ability to let off a dirty nuclear weapon was pretty serious." It's just a little ol' dirty bomb, nothing new here, time to move on. Freakin' jerk-off propaganda RAT machines.
47
posted on
08/04/2003 12:39:22 PM PDT
by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
To: xm177e2
Exactly. It's not all as bad as they sound. I think that you would have to be looking for radioactivity to even notce they one had been exploded. They would have been wasted on the Iranians. They wouldn't have noticed any effects untill after they had kicked Sadams butt.(if we had left them alone)
48
posted on
08/04/2003 2:41:01 PM PDT
by
brooklin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson