Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper Grassroots Movement to Re-Elect Bush
July 24, 2003 | nwrep

Posted on 07/24/2003 9:00:48 AM PDT by nwrep

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 501-504 next last
To: AAABEST
Should we discuss YOUR second personna over at LP?
101 posted on 08/03/2003 8:44:25 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Louie "darkdrake" Gonazles
"Should we discuss YOUR second personna over at LP?" - Louie "I have at least 2 screenames" Gonzalez.

By all means, it's the same as it is here "AAABEST". That's the only one I've ever had here in 5 + years and they only one I have there.

By all means....discuss.

102 posted on 08/03/2003 8:47:33 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Speaking of judges, have you noticed that the George Bush Republicans (who have a popular President and control both Houses) aren't even requiring that the Democrats fillibuster their judicial nominees?

interesting, yes?

When Clinton took office he did a complete purge of the DOJ and replaced them all with his cronies. Did you notice that Bush has kept them?

interesting, yes?

Bush has determined that the Republican party will be the fully melded party. It will be the party that holds sole bragging rights to the major political issues of the day; namely social engineering programs. It will discard the right-wing conservative activists, because they will no longer be necessary to hold power.
103 posted on 08/03/2003 8:48:43 AM PDT by Mark Felton ("All liberty flows from the barrel of a gun")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
By the way, when lacking a proper response to charges leveled at them, the Clinton's invariably responded by using personal attacks.

I see you use similar tactics. I must have it home with my analysys of you "do-nothing conservatives".

Is it Daschle or Sharpton for you this year?
104 posted on 08/03/2003 8:54:17 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
By the way, if you don't like my being here, take it up with management.

But you don't have the balls to do that, do you?
105 posted on 08/03/2003 8:55:33 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Is it Daschle or Sharpton for you this year?

Sharpton for PREZ!!!

106 posted on 08/03/2003 8:58:33 AM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: The Coopster
So remind me again just how evil he is?

Keep walking lockstep with partyline, accepting the leftward drift. Just as 1963 JFK was more conservative than 2003 Bush, the 2003 Hillary Clinton be more conservative than the George H. W. J. A. B. C. Bush of 2043.

107 posted on 08/03/2003 9:01:19 AM PDT by putupon (Hey Ronald Reagan, thanks for the memories.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Louie "darkdrake" Gonazles
"By the way, when lacking a proper response to charges leveled at them, the Clinton's invariably responded by using personal attacks. I see you use similar tactics. I must have it home with my analysys of you "do-nothing conservatives". Is it Daschle or Sharpton for you this year? By the way, if you don't like my being here, take it up with management. But you don't have the balls to do that, do you? " - Louie "multi-personna" Gonzalez.

You're not making any sense Louie. I never said I had a problem with you being here (just telling the truth) and I don't like any of the politicos you mentioned above. I also never ask the mods to ban anyone unless they're bringing the forum down, never for personal reasons. I didn't even personally attack you, unless you call disclosing what you say you weren't trying to hide a personal attack. IOW, you're going g00-g00 on me again.

Then you wonder why I call you "Screwy Louie".

108 posted on 08/03/2003 9:05:56 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
So, if you had no problem with any of the above, my being here, my having different personalities here and there, or anything, then the only thing you object to is the one thing you are not discussing...which is what I stated in my post.

Want to talk about hypocrites?

Get yourself to a mirror.

Regards;

LG

109 posted on 08/03/2003 9:15:31 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
*yawn*
110 posted on 08/03/2003 9:21:23 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I thought so.
111 posted on 08/03/2003 9:26:48 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

"I thought so."

112 posted on 08/03/2003 9:32:05 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
They didn’t have to answer, their answer was quite clear; they will support, by either their actions, or their inactions, whatever candidate wins the DNC nomination.

I have not heard any candidate at all plausibly address the problem of outsourcing jobs and the dismal employment situation this outsourcing is creating in this country. Not one. Unfortunately, that includes GW Bush. I think this is going to be a big issue by next year. I wish Bush were at least looking hard at it. I don't see now that he is.

I just said elsewhere, "Stop worrying about Bush II repeating Bush I. Start worrying about Bush II repeating Herbert Hoover."

Hoover's loss to Roosevelt in '32 was not so big numerically as Roosevelt's later thumping of Alf Landon, or Johnson's of Goldwater, or Reagan's of Mondale. But it was huge and historic for the enormous coattails FDR dragged in that election. It made the Republicans a minority party for so long, they still haven't lost the mindset.

I desperately hope that doesn't happen to us again. That's why I'm screaming for Republicans, not Democrats, to get the White House's attention this year, not next year. We're looking at the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression.

You don't get people's attention by telling them you're signed up, no matta no matta. In fact, I'd be foolish to ignore a candidate who actually had what looked like the best way to avoid a looming disaster. Even if I were so foolish, I doubt the bulk of the voters would be. The good news (or bad news?) is there is so far no such candidate. There's still time for him to be Bush.

113 posted on 08/03/2003 9:42:58 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
. Who is willing to run against Bush and risk their political career by taking on an incumbent?

I don't see the relevance of the question. If anyone does run, it's up to me to identify which candidate best fits my beliefs and support him. I'm not going to mindlessly support GW Bush in the primary simply because he is President.

114 posted on 08/03/2003 10:04:29 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I like that graphic, glad you do as well.

Are you ready to put down the bottle and discuss the issues, or haven't you stopped drinking yet?
115 posted on 08/03/2003 10:05:51 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
And by God man, get it right next time!

Regards;

DD


116 posted on 08/03/2003 10:07:16 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
"I'm not going to mindlessly support GW Bush in the primary simply because he is President."

Finally, a man who understands the system.

That's the time to send your message home, then comes the time to stop Democrats at all costs.

117 posted on 08/03/2003 10:09:41 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: putupon
Keep walking lockstep with partyline....

Quoting Joe Hadenuf is impressive, but do you have anything to offer except regurgitation of your cohorts?

118 posted on 08/03/2003 10:10:15 AM PDT by The Coopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
"I have not heard any candidate at all plausibly address the problem of outsourcing jobs and the dismal employment situation this outsourcing is creating in this country."

OK, something to sink our teeth into here.

I don't think that the government has any business telling industry that they can't outsource jobs, having said that, I also recognize the dangers involved in sending jobs overseas.

As a solution, and middle ground, I've always thought that we should incentivize the outsourcing of jobs to countries in order to gain benefits beyond low wages.

I think that the Feds should offer incentives to companies that outsource, or even build facilities, in our hemisphere. If we are going to outsource jobs, let's outsource them to Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. so they can stay home and make money. I'd rather outsource ten million jobs to countries in our hemisphere, than have ten million illegals coming here looking for work.

119 posted on 08/03/2003 10:20:06 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: carenot
(I think that's AAA's boy)
120 posted on 08/03/2003 10:21:18 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (I am legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 501-504 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson