Skip to comments.
NORTH KOREA ISSUES *NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL* THREAT THROUGH ITS UNITED NATIONS MISSION TO S. KOREAN MEDIA
Hangyorei News (Korea) via Yomiuri News (Tokyo) in Japanese ^
| 16 June 2003
| Takushi Kawada, Yomiuri News (Tokyo)
Posted on 07/16/2003 7:52:56 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
As usual, serious, folks. As we have always concluded and as they have alluded to in the past.
This is and continues smell of 'nuclear blackmail', right out in the open.
It should supercede any news story on the front pages of the American newspapers or the top of the hour radio news. This is appearing in Korean and Japanese only at this moment, according to what I've been reading.
To: AmericanInTokyo
The DPRK is sniffing around for another pay-off. They must really miss Bubba. Were he still around, they'd be rollin' in dough.
2
posted on
07/16/2003 7:57:01 AM PDT
by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: AmericanInTokyo
"I have thought for some months that if the North Koreans moved toward processing [spent fuel rods], then we are on a path toward war," [former Defense Sec.] Perry told the Washington Post.
3
posted on
07/16/2003 7:59:29 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
How is this being played in Tokyo? Big news, medium news, etc?
In addition, what is reaction from Japaneese MOS? They are very sensitive to nuc weapon issues.... so wondering how this is being seen by the indig?
If necessary, Duck!
4
posted on
07/16/2003 8:00:24 AM PDT
by
MindBender26
(For more news as it happens, stay tuned to your local FReeper station.........)
To: AmericanInTokyo
US, British, Chinese, Australian, S. Korean special forces are probably already on the job.
Headlines I expect to see:
"Internal explosion rocks N. Korean nuclear facility"
"Fuel from nuclear plants 'disappear' overnight"
"Sabatoged nuclear plant cannot be rebuilt"
etc....
But I don't think it'll be a shooting war.jmho
To: AmericanInTokyo
Nuke em now.
6
posted on
07/16/2003 8:01:29 AM PDT
by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
To: AmericanInTokyo
It does look like a game of chicken but I don't think the NKs know how to drive.
To: AmericanInTokyo
A few tactical nukes leveling Pyongyang would take out most of the leadership of the country.
8
posted on
07/16/2003 8:04:17 AM PDT
by
DoctorMichael
(>>>>>Liberals Suk. Liberalism Sukz.<<<<<)
To: AmericanInTokyo
It would be great if we could somehow get the citizens of NK to open their eyes and see what the madman in control of them is doing. Perhaps smuggle vast quantities of hand-cranked radios into the country.
9
posted on
07/16/2003 8:04:18 AM PDT
by
Spruce
To: Principled
IIRC, the primary problem is that the NK facilities are deep underground and we don't have sufficiently reliable targeting intel to be certain of getting it all before they could launch a counterstrike.
To: Wordsmith
So what they've done is ensure their obliteration?
To: AmericanInTokyo
And it burns, burns, burns.... that sea of fire... that sea of fire...
12
posted on
07/16/2003 8:10:00 AM PDT
by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Is the UN going to do anything about it, or are we going to continue to wasted our money being abused and used by this terrorist organization?
To: Wordsmith
I believe you are right about the facilities being underground, but what kind of counterstrike do you think NK would try to do? Against the US or its allies?
14
posted on
07/16/2003 8:11:57 AM PDT
by
A Texan
(Lets finish the Game)
To: Principled
Yes. The best article I read on this recently equated NK to a national Jonestown suicide cult. The question is, how many are they going to take down with them? I can't imagine the US launching a preemptive nuclear ballistic strike. So whatever we do short of that, NK will likely have enough oomph left to hit somebody hard - which will then serve as the justification for finishing them off.
To: mabelkitty
Is the UN going to do anything about it
Why should they start now, and ruin their 50 years of inaction record?
To: AmericanInTokyo
This is really stupid of the NKoms.
Now that they have threatened to develop and export nuclear material and delivery equipment we must inspect their means of delivery. The only way we would interere in their trade is if it was nuclear material. If we find it, that would mean that they had already developed and exported that material without action from us. So to say that we instigated that production is an obvious ploy. The truth is: the NKoms intend to sell the weapons for money and if the weapons are to be used against the US that would make the NKoms happy. Action pursuant to that stance is tantamount to an act of war. If that's what the NKoms want, I am certain that Bush has the means and the will to respond appropriately.
Doth Pyongyang aspire to a glass refactory?
I am really curious about the South Koreans and whether they have the courage to face reality. I have my doubts. I am certain that elements of their media are pretending that there is a peaceful way out of this. It may be too late for that. Are they making serious preparations to survive a limited nuclear exchange?
17
posted on
07/16/2003 8:13:44 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Wordsmith
IIRC, the primary problem is that the NK facilities are deep underground and we don't have sufficiently reliable targeting intel to be certain of getting it all before they could launch a counterstrike. OTOH, there is only one Kim Jong Il, and intel as to his whereabouts is probably much easier to obtain.
18
posted on
07/16/2003 8:14:53 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: AmericanInTokyo
(In my best Korean/English)
Ah no you kah say oh, Mr. Kim
To: A Texan
I don't know enough to say. From what I've read, I think the scenarios include both massive conventional strikes against SK (including US forces stationed there) as well as attempted (considering the reliability of their missles) nuclear strikes against Japan and/or the US west coast.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson