Skip to comments.
Scuttle the Shuttle! Foundation Urges
Space Frontier Foundation Press Release via SpaceRef ^
| Monday, July 14, 2003
| Rick Tumlinson
Posted on 07/15/2003 6:29:25 PM PDT by anymouse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: Sam Cree
"[D]on't you think NASA was pretty good in the early days? I wonder what's changed, they seemed inspired and excited back then. Perhaps it is as you say, the perceived competition (against the Russians) is gone."My grandfather was one of the NACA engineers who became the founders of NASA. Those engineers had all just spent the duration of World War II developing warplanes. (Admittedly, some of those engineers designed planes for the Luftwaffe, but the principle is the same.) During wartime, getting results quickly, and getting them right the first time, meant the difference between life and death, victory and defeat. They ran NASA the same way they had run their wartime projects: lean, quick, free of bureaucracy and committed to doing whatever it took to hit the target.
Competition from the Soviets was a factor, but it was their wartime experience that taught them how to compete. By the end of Apollo, though, that spirit was gone. The war-hardened engineers were too old to keep running projects with that same intensity; they either became upper managers or moved to other opportunities. The ones who followed them learned their skills not in the airplane factories of a nation at war but in the postgraduate classrooms of universities rocked by 60s radicalism.
If you want to find engineers with that early-NASA spirit today, you can't look anywhere in the aerospace industry. You have to look at growth industries like computers, software and biotechnology, where the high-stakes, cutting-edge atmosphere of start-ups and IPOs inculcates that same "victory or death" ethic. In other words, the best way to duplicate NASA's early success is to kill NASA and offer its budget as prizes to private-sector firms.
21
posted on
07/16/2003 6:43:47 PM PDT
by
Fabozz
To: Fabozz
Thanks, that's very interesting and believable. It explains alot.
22
posted on
07/16/2003 6:46:55 PM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: Fabozz
I completely concur. Check my profile page for links to some space forums of interest.
23
posted on
07/16/2003 8:59:17 PM PDT
by
anymouse
To: Iris7
There are fields were performance remains high, over generations. Every one I'm thinking of has the professional delivering directly to the person who uses or benefits from what is deleivered For example: surgeons, fire men, tailors, carpenters, masons, plumbers, electricians, theater.
24
posted on
07/16/2003 9:06:22 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: bvw
One can find good men in these fields, and also in the large bureaucratic organizations. I am involved in the latter sort of operation, and find the good men in it in a never ending struggle, making a great personal effort, sacrificing, to keep the organization running at all. This is probably how things work everywhere and everywhen (at least from my point of view).
25
posted on
07/16/2003 11:12:43 PM PDT
by
Iris7
To: anymouse
Do this right and we have the next economic boom.
To: Sam Cree
Just to be accurate, no one can say with absolute certainty what the threshhold level of healthy gee force would be, naturally there has been no way to empirically test it,but the best speculations I have read by people in the field is that half gee would be more than sufficient.
27
posted on
07/17/2003 9:02:00 AM PDT
by
barkeep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson