French secret service 'kept CIA in the dark over Iraq and uranium'

The Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 07/14/03 | Michael Smith

[OWK]

You figured that out by yourself, didja?

[Catspaw]

Oh, com'n, OWK--you can insult people better than that. After all, this thread is replete with them.

[Jolly Rodgers]

That's right. BINGO! You are a neo-con. Like that's tough to figure out.

[justshutupandtakeit]

That's some good stuff there, unfortunately most is either not true or exaggerated or both.

What is true, not exaggerated and both is that Bush is the only leader who should even be remotely considered as suitable for sitting in the White House. There are NO RATS even clost to suitable, third party candidates aren't even on the radar screen they are such lightweights and the GOPers who might be suitable SUPPORT W.

What does that tell you?

[r9etb]

That's right. BINGO! You are a neo-con. Like that's tough to figure out.

LOL! I'm not a "neo-con," whatever that is. It's just really fun to see how you whatsis-types have settled on the word as the latest epithet of choice.

Clearly you've never played buzz-word bingo, plus you seem to lack any semblance of a sense of humor. Your loss -- but it sure adds to the fun when you fellers get a burr under your saddle.

[talleyman]

BTW, what exactly is a "Neo-con"?

[r9etb]

BTW, what exactly is a "Neo-con"?

Judging from the people they apply it to, I think it's a polite way for them to say "jew-boy communist."

[Jolly Rodgers]

Oh, so you're a racist, too? I should have known.

[OWK]

What have you got against jews?

[r9etb]

What have you got against jews?

I've got nothing whatever against jews.

[r9etb]

Oh, so you're a racist, too? I should have known.

Sigh. That's thick-headed, even for you.

[OWK]

Then why the jew-bashing?

[r9etb]

Then why the jew-bashing?

Why don't read what I posted before saying stupid things?

And what do you have to say about the article -- you know, France, and Niger, and yellow-cake uranium. That's what this thread is about -- or was.

[OWK]

You posted "jew-boy communist."

Why the need to slur people?

Nobody was talking about jews.

[Sabertooth]

And the anti-Republican/anti-Bush paleocon/paleolibertarian/buchananite/rockwellian/anarchist movement has combined with the Democrat/French/German/Iraq pro-terror axis.

I know you're kidding, because you left off witches.

[Jolly Rodgers]

You resorted to racist language in an effort to evade responsibility for the political philosophy you advocate. Your maneuver is just as filthy, and rooted in the same gutter, as the anti-semites.

[colorado tanker]

So, Bush apologized when he didn't have to? The Brits had more intel than they told us? And (what's new) the French were being duplicitous? But some new poll says that in one obscure category Bush's rating went down a little bit? My head hurts.

[r9etb]

You posted "jew-boy communist." Why the need to slur people? Nobody was talking about jews.

Sigh. You apparently still have not read the entire post. It was not a slur on jews, it was an insult directed toward people like Pat Buchanan who use the term "neo-con" as a perjorative.

Your refusal to read in context is telling. But it doesn't tell me anything I didn't already know.

[r9etb]

You resorted to racist language in an effort to evade responsibility for the political philosophy you advocate.

I don't seem to recall having advocated any political philosophy on this thread.

[OWK]

You weren't talking to (or about) Pat Buchanan when you brought the slur into the conversation.