Skip to comments.
Scandal!
National Review Online ^
| July 11, 2003
| Clifford D. May
Posted on 07/11/2003 9:07:08 AM PDT by WarrenC
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-191 next last
To: Maigrey
THanks!
101
posted on
07/11/2003 10:45:59 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: Pan_Yans Wife
You're asking someone who thought Bill Clinton didn't have a prayer of being President!I don't belive one line in the speech is going to do it.I do believe fomenting trouble for the CIA/NSA/Whitehouse is good for the Dems and Congress will want to look all concerned about this,etc,etc.
102
posted on
07/11/2003 10:46:12 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Nothing about an election is a sure thing.Your principles may help get a Dem president elected.
103
posted on
07/11/2003 10:50:30 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
It's possible that Bush may be re-elected. After all, Clinton was re-elected too, while opposed by a Republican who was proud of not having read his party's platform. Bush being re-eleced will not be good for the country. I understand that Bush's un-election would mean that a Democrat will assume the presidency but I believe we are in greater peril with this administration being given 4 more years than having a new democrat in the WH, vigurously opposed (I hope) in the Congress. After all, it took 2 years of Clinton to put the House and the Senate under GOP control.
To: PhiKapMom
"My take is that the Clintons are trying to take down Pres Bush right now and see if this works. If this hurts Pres Bush, then I would look for her to announce she is running and why I think this timed for now! I could be very wrong about that but that is the only answer I can come up with for timing.You are spot on!(IMHO)The Hildebeast and the real liar have come to the conclusion that they cannot wait until 2008. Deep down they cannot take the chance that by then the economy and the stock market will have come roaring back.The people will give Bush and the Republicans credit(like they have given clinton)and will vote a third term for the pubs. Remember the dims would have been given a third term if clinton was'nt the elephant in the room! This is just the opening salvo of many more to come!IMHO) This will fail. President Bush when the time is right, will stave off the onslaught. The dims under the power hungry control of the clintons, will suffer the worst political defeat in their history. In the meantime we must stay vigilant and continue to expose the lies of the left. Great work like you, William McKinley, ragtime cowgirl and other outstanding posters will not go unrewarded.
The key is that the dims have most always gotten their agenda through the SCOTUS. If President Bush wins in 2004 he will have 4 yrs to seat strict constructionists, a fact that the dims abhor, and will do anything to prevent. This is why I believe the hildebeast has always planned to run in 2004!!
To: PhiKapMom
Thanks for the heads up, PKM. Good for National Review. I think the left has underestimated us - again.
106
posted on
07/11/2003 11:02:47 AM PDT
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
(We're in a global war on terrorism..If you want to call that a quagmire, do it. I don't.*Rummy* 6-30)
To: Oystir
NPR/commie chick name Katrina Vander Fluffer going nuts calling Bush a liar. She had a vicious look in her eye like a rabid racoon.
Oh she's awful... They sandbagged Ann with her on PMSNBC the day after Slander came out. She was vicious. She kept saying "You're trafficking in this book. You're trafficking. I believe she is the editor of The Nation.
107
posted on
07/11/2003 11:03:26 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Understand the root causes of American Anger.)
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Don't. Who cares. Since 2000, I've signed up 8 non-voters, and converted six Democrats. We won't miss you.
To: johnb838
Yes ..It's so bad the liberal Hitchens left it
109
posted on
07/11/2003 11:06:00 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Jim Robinson does not think your strategy is a proper one for conservatives.
110
posted on
07/11/2003 11:10:29 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: johnb838
NPR/commie chick name Katrina Vander Fluffer going nuts calling Bush a liar. She had a vicious look in her eye like a rabid racoon.She even quoted Welch's "Have you no shame" statement to Dick Armey, who through his outrage calmly handed her head to her on a platter!!
To: woodyinscc
I wish I would have seen that. After Armey said that the palis should be given a state -- far away from Israel, I've been a big fan. I wish he hadn't retired. Losing Armey and Gramm has really hurt us this time out.
112
posted on
07/11/2003 11:18:47 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Understand the root causes of American Anger.)
To: mabelkitty
Good job!
113
posted on
07/11/2003 11:25:09 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
"I understand that Bush's un-election would mean that a Democrat will assume the presidency but I believe we are in greater peril with this administration being given 4 more years than having a new democrat in the WH, vigurously opposed (I hope) in the Congress."
What 'peril' are you talking about?
114
posted on
07/11/2003 12:01:58 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: Crusher138
Our CIA is on the fence.I agree with your analysis, except for that phrase. Rice said yesterday that the CIA made minor changes (deleting references to Niger and the amount of uranium), but did not advise the deletion of the statement. That's hardly "on the fence."
And speaking of the CIA, can someone explain why they chose someone with Wilson's background, Saudi connections and blatant political bias to investigate the Niger claim? They might as well have sent Terry McAuliffe.
What bothers me most about this story is no one is questioning the bad judgment -- and obvious lack of independent intelligence -- by the CIA, and why Tenent didn't jump out in front, like the head of the Australian intelligence did to protect Howard? What is Tenent's game?
To: WarrenC
I say give 'em enough rope. I have come to the conclusion that is exactly what Bush is doing.
116
posted on
07/11/2003 12:38:01 PM PDT
by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: MEG33; PhiKapMom; Miss Marple; Mo1; MJY1288; mware; hchutch; Grampa Dave; MeeknMing; JohnHuang2
I found some new info on Greg Thielmann who is being quoted in the media..
A. Greg Thielmann
A. Greg Thielmann '72 After earning his bachelor's degree in political science, with honors, A. Greg Thielmann went on to work for then-Congressman John Culver. He studied international affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton, then entered the United States Foreign Service where he has compiled a distinguished service record during a career of 25 years. Although he has filled a variety of assignments, he has been most deeply involved in arms control and security issues. He is currently acting director of the Strategic, Proliferation, and Military Affairs Office in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research at the State Department.
Congressman John Culver was a DEMOCRAT.
Mr. Thielmann retired from his job back in Sept of last year.......and only now is coming forward with his objections to our intell..
Seems another connection to the DEMOCRATS..
117
posted on
07/11/2003 12:46:55 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: Peach; mabelkitty; Dog Gone; mhking; Registered
See.. post 117 new info..
118
posted on
07/11/2003 12:52:27 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: Dog
Good work, Dog!
To: browardchad
What is Tenent's game?CYA?
120
posted on
07/11/2003 1:04:28 PM PDT
by
carton253
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-191 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson