Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD
Capitol Hill Blue ^
| July 9, 2003
| Doug Thompson
Posted on 07/09/2003 4:04:00 PM PDT by Doug Thompson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860, 861-880, 881-900 ... 1,321-1,340 next last
To: Mo1
Interesting, isn't it? I wish we had a hard printout of those articles. Hopefully, someone does, perhaps someone who is more concerned than we are.
I am interested in the William Rivers Pitt connection and how these people are paid.
Which brings up some interesting trains of thought. I am going to think on this for a while.
To: Registered
I'm shocked. Shocked, I tell you.
To: MJY1288
Todd was a cut-n-paste master, he could dig up an article faster than many around here :-)
Very true, and I never had a problem with that, nor did I quite understand why others did. Cross-referenced threads are won of the best attributes of FR.
That said, I'm gonna drop it now. I only intended to give him credit for helping me find that William Rivers Pitt post, not to try and reanimate a dead horse.
To: Mo1
She's not the first to broach the subject. The word "impeachment" has been invoked on DU and other sites, of course. But the likes of Chris Matthews (whose initial perception is usually way off and I concede when the facts are clear will admit it) and Keith Olberman have been talking hopefully about investigations and Olberman speculated to Andrea Mitchell that maybe "someone" would provide an envelope of documentation to a Congressman or something. Clearly he was thinking an informant ala "Deep Throat" would expose President Bush. By last night he had toned it down, as he's quicker than Matthews on the uptake.
There is no doubt in my mind that the dems and their allies would love "payback" for clinton's impeachment and they are willing ("Bush Knew!") to pull out all the stops to try and achieve this end.
To: Miss Marple
It gets "curiouser and curiouser"!
865
posted on
07/10/2003 11:03:06 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Miss Marple
Japan today published it. Pitt says they shouldn't have.
I am beginning to wonder if Thompson is really dismayed that anyone else picked up the article.
And, again, how many other articles are there, that use this source... where else are the published?
To: Sabertooth
:-)
867
posted on
07/10/2003 11:03:18 AM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: Sabertooth
"won" should be "one," sheesh.
To: JoeSixPack1
I don't fight for fun and I think this thread has gone on far enough to the point where we both have lost track of the original purpose.
Let's just agree to disagree and retain our mutual contempt for each other.
Now, get in the last words so that you won't be stewing in your own juices for the rest of the week.
869
posted on
07/10/2003 11:03:50 AM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
What did you think of his "no unnamed sources pledge"!?
870
posted on
07/10/2003 11:05:00 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: cyncooper
In the meantime, I mentioned I have the radio on and the ABC news at the top of the hour played a clip of Sheila Jackson Lee calling for an independent prosecutor be appointed and she specified the Nigerian story.
I know some will laugh because she is laughable, but ABC didn't think so, which goes back to the media willingness to carry dem water.
It's funny though that the Sheila Jackson Lees of the world don't find perjury an impeachable offense and yet mentioning some faulty intel in a speech is. It's funny but it is not surprising.
To: MEG33
Until he writes a lengthly piece, detailing all of the times this bogus "source" was used, and then backtracks on each and every point that was made using this source as a reference, I will just ignore CHB.
How about you?
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Here it comes... from Rush, I think?!
To: Miss Marple
Interesting, isn't it? Yes it is, as for hard print .. someone may have them, problem is out of all the articles CB has done .. we don't know for sure which ones were deleted
874
posted on
07/10/2003 11:08:46 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Been doing that since the Madman at 1600 post.
875
posted on
07/10/2003 11:08:50 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Nah... Novak. Sorry.
To: MEG33
If even Thompson cannot put this to rest, and now digs up another dead horse for us to beat, then perhaps we are foolish if we pay him too much attention.
To: William McKinley
Then Pitt claims that they had no permission to republish it.
Make that "no permission to republish the republishing," since I guess that's how we should parse the phrase "stole it, too."
Did the Japan Today article credit truthout?
Do they have other truthout articles posted/stolen?
Will William Rivers Pitt pursue legal remedies to prevent Japan Today from stealing and more widely disseminating his screeds in the future?
More importantly, will Rocky be able to defuse the bomb and still save Bullwinkle as he plummets down Frostbite Falls?
To: cyncooper
The word "impeachment" has been invoked on DU and other sites, of course. Yes, I have noticed that from a number of the talking rats on TV. I agree, they want blood and will do anything to get it
879
posted on
07/10/2003 11:11:15 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Here it comes... from Rush, I think?!I thought he was gearing up to address it, too, but he's on another Novak column about the resignation of that counter-terrorism expert who joined the Kerry campaign and now the replacement is a clinton holdover.
I am sorely tempted to turn him off at this point---but I won't----yet.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860, 861-880, 881-900 ... 1,321-1,340 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson