I agree with Ann Coulter

Newsmax ^ | 7/8/03 | Phil Brennan

[Itzlzha]

Kennedy’s election gave the liberals an opening to bring a lot of old discredited security risks back into government service. Not long after the election, Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Bobby Kennedy met with State Department security chief Otto Otepka to discuss the possibility of obtaining security clearance for one Walt Whitman Rostow, a one-worlder who had once written a book calling for "an end to nationhood," and had been chosen to be J.F.K.’s chief foreign-policy planner.

Otepka was stunned. Rostow, he knew, had been denied security clearance three times during the Eisenhower administration.

In reading "Treason" it seems the same damned names reoccurred in one DemocRAT administration after another.

Not all the Venona transcripts have been released...my speculation is that ALL the DemocRATs have been used by the Socialists, and the ones who "resisted" were blackmailed and coerced otherwise.

I think the rest of the transcripts would reveal this and are being squashed like the Dead Sea scrolls...kept from the "masses" that might not like what they see.

[DPB101]

Yes, imagine what we don't know. The Vietnam antiwar movement was funded and organized by the Kremlin. Imagine how many American names are in the KGB files about that.

[Itzlzha]

Yes, imagine what we don't know. The Vietnam antiwar movement was funded and organized by the Kremlin. Imagine how many American names are in the KGB files about that.

Bill Clinton...Hillary Rodham...Madeline Half-wit...Shaky-Spice Reno...the list is MIND-BOGGLING!!!

GW should hire Gary Aldrich and have ALL those who got in under IMPOTUSx42's regime (I can use lib-speak as well...) that escaped vetting...failed vetting and were given waivers...and those that just plain NEED a vetting FIRED immediately!!!

[lainie]

It absolutely makes sense. You're absolutely right. But isn't she in a damned-if-I-don't, damned-if-I-do situation? What you said about self-described liberal readers is correct, but as you know, if Ann left any wiggle room in defining liberals as leftists she'd be faced with nothing but that, in terms of criticism. It's already tedious enough that every single interviewer from the left these days wastes time asking about the legal definition of treason and which Democrats she'd bring up on charges. In her last book she went down the liberal=socialist road, too, so I suppose (purely speculating) it was a decision to plow ahead, straight forward. That's what she does best anyway.

Her whole persona is that of a straight-talker. Liberal readers might be gathered to the fold faster, but I'd rather see an inherent change of bias, which they eventually have to face. Can the kind of bias that makes her stand out today be changed to make them stand out in the future?

[Eva]

I only wish that Ann would defend her book by saying that the use of the word treason is satirical hyperbole to describe something which is essentially a thought crime. These people are missing the whole point of her book which is that we are in an ideological war with the left, so a thought crime can rightly be described as treasonous without being treasonous in a court of law.

If you notice Ann does not go into the technology transfers or other issues which could rightfully be ajudicated as treasonous.

[DPB101]

The RATS are so deep in the bureaucracy Bush needs another term just to root them out.

An example of how bad it was. Article regarding Clinton National Security Advisor Anthony Lake's possible promotion to head the Central Intelligence Agency:

Arguably, the most troubling glimpse of Anthony Lake's belief system with regard to foreign espionage against the United States -- and the political will to root out these insidious acts designed to undermine this Nation's liberty -- came in response to a question posed about the recently deceased Alger Hiss.

Mr. Russert: "Let me ask you a question. In our 'Meet the Press' Minute, we have Whittaker Chambers on this program talking about Alger Hiss. You're a student of history. Do you believe Alger Hiss was a spy?"

Mr. Lake: "I've read a couple of books that certainly offered a lot of evidence that he may have been. I don't think it's conclusive." ¹

[Carthago delenda est]

Bump for later!

[jla]

I agree with Ann Coulter

...and still do, 100%!

[ChadGore]

[DPB101]

Lol...New York Times bestseller list out yet?