Skip to comments.
Has she no shame? [Conason on Coulter--Some Men Just Can't Handle Blondes]
Salon ^
| July 4, 2003
| Joe Conason
Posted on 07/05/2003 10:44:31 AM PDT by publius1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 341-354 next last
Comment #281 Removed by Moderator
Comment #282 Removed by Moderator
To: PapaJohnMN
I pointed out there are Democrats in the military - and junior enlisted outnumber officers and senior enlisted by a large margin. One can be democrat and not liberal - it only requires ignorance.
Liberals fear absolutes. That is why they may love religion, but fear any god that they cannot remake into their own image. That is also why they hate America: we are an absolute type of society - or we were until liberals attempted to screw with education. The idea that America might actually be right drives them nuts. They will deceive to win elections (the professional politicians & war votes), but they will constantly attack anything claiming superiority of our culture.
To: PapaJohnMN
Coulter claims that all liberals, including the Democrats in the military, do not love their country and are guilty of treason. And I quote from the book: "Everyone says liberals love America, too. No, they dont."
More selective quotes. She was making a generality, not claiming "all liberals, including the Democrats in the military, do not love their country and are guilty of treason."
Comment #285 Removed by Moderator
To: publius1
I read Ann's book and Conason's article. While preparing a lenghty rebutal to Mr. Conason, I realized the message he needed to get was simple:
4Q2
To: PapaJohnMN
45 years of experience. Never met a liberal who believed in the Bible or any absolute - except the evil of smoking...
Where do liberals reign supreme? In the NE & CA - both places where liberal churches thrive. BTW - I'm off to church now.
To: PapaJohnMN
Anyone that criticizes Coulter is a liberal?Anyone that criticizes "her facts" is a liberal. The answer is yes to that statement. I don't have any problem with someone criticizing Ms Coulter because that is just their opinion but when she has documented everything and still gets the dimocRatic spin applied to her work, it ticks me off.
I hope you see the difference in criticizing the individual and criticizing a valuable, honest book of facts.
288
posted on
07/06/2003 9:52:49 AM PDT
by
zip
(Socialists hate Ann Coulter because she is always right)
To: publius1
-^SEE ABOVE^- Conoson provideing evidence to Coulters all 3 books...
(which are currently all in top 50 best sellers on Amazon)
Comment #290 Removed by Moderator
Comment #291 Removed by Moderator
Comment #292 Removed by Moderator
To: PapaJohnMN
Didn't get the memoAnd apparently didn't get the book either. Do you understand references? Check them out but since you are so left of me, I'm sure you won't.
293
posted on
07/06/2003 10:13:42 AM PDT
by
zip
(Socialists hate Ann Coulter because she is always right)
Comment #294 Removed by Moderator
Comment #295 Removed by Moderator
To: PapaJohnMN; zip; Mr Rogers
And I quote from the book: "Everyone says liberals love America, too. No, they dont."
Not only have you not read the book you are attributing "quotes" to it that don't exist in the 16 pages you did read. In post #239 you said "Coulter claims that all liberals, including the Democrats in the military, do not love their country and are guilty of treason". Where is that in the book? Excuse me, correction, where is that in the 16 of the 292 pages you say you read. Where?
I don't give much weight to anyone commenting on a subject (The Book Treason in this case) they studied less than 95% of.
296
posted on
07/06/2003 10:24:50 AM PDT
by
isthisnickcool
(Liberals - Their neural synapses are corroded.)
Comment #297 Removed by Moderator
To: liberallarry
"If she really does accuse Marshall I don't have to read any further - her stuff is trash." She wouldn't be the first or the only American who didn't like what we were doing in Europe after the war. Yockey was sounding the alarms and it cost him his life; taken in this country without a peep from our government at the time.
298
posted on
07/06/2003 10:39:09 AM PDT
by
fightu4it
(Hillary Clinton -- Commander-In-Chief of US Armed Forces? Never.....Never....Never!)
To: capt. norm
The isolationists were not having huge televised protest demonstrations that the enemy could use for propaganda, for one Of course, they didn't - commercial television didn't yet exist. But they did have huge demonstrations that the enemy could and did use for propaganda - and some were openly sympathic to the Nazis.
To: Thumper1960
It's when you cross the line and collaborate with foreign enemies of this country that you become a "traitor". Exactly.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 341-354 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson