Has she no shame? [Conason on Coulter--Some Men Just Can't Handle Blondes]

Salon ^ | July 4, 2003 | Joe Conason

[MissouriForBush]

The fact that you would put Ann Coulter in the same category with Michael Moore explains the reason for your recent sign-up date.

[Darksheare]

Yes, liberals are very predictable.
Their mental illness cannot allow them to do anything independant from the party, as if they're a soviet politburo style group.
Everything is 'for the party' and thinking outside the approved guidelines for the party gets one banned form the party.
I have spoken to several here in New York that have been ostracised by their fellow Democrats for 'different think'.
Yet they still robotically vote in GOOSEstep with their party.
So it wouldn't surprise me if Conason wrote teh article based off of Carvile talking points, it sure reads as if Carvile had some small hand in it.

[MissouriForBush]

You´re missing the point. Coulter does not have to explain "the millions of Democrats that have served their country in the military..."

She does a great job explaining how Democrats have been duped and misled by their own party.

[Darksheare]

Jake Gunther is on teh outs here in New York because he dared to defy Sheldon Silver.
So far, he's only black-balled.
If he goes against "Lord Silver" again he'll be effectively removed from his place.
If you'd bothered to read what I said, normal voters like myself get banned and ostracised.
Politicians don't speak to 'the little people' remember?

[Darksheare]

Freedom of association?
Hah!
The Democrats do not belive in that.
They believe in this principle: You're intolerant if you do not agree with them.

[Darksheare]

I served in teh military.
Yes, Democrats in the military do not love this country.
That has been true of ALL the democrats I have met in the military.
One of them being a certain Colonel Gabriel Michele

[Darksheare]

You're a typical liberal.
Why don't you READ what I posted?

[Darksheare]

Ad hominem attack?
It was more wit and charm than you've shown in all your posts.

Besides, it was also an accurate description of the Liberal way of getting ideas.
By sniffing the political winds they are passing.
Remember?
Clinton goes where the wind blows.
As did her rapist traitor husband Bubba.

[Bush2000]

The S.S. officers were guilty, as the Senate report confirmed

What else can you expect from Conason? He's a professional liar. A hack with a mouthpiece. McCarthy's objection to the Malmedy trials was because (a) their confessions were obtained under duress (reportedly by crushing their genitals), and (b) liberal seeming preoccupation with punishing Nazis was a smokescreen for helping the Soviets. Conason has a short memory on tainted campaign donations: His own boss held tea parties for the Chinese military and drug dealers. Liberals are desperate to hang onto the "McCarthyism" gambit because, as Coulter suggests, it's the only tool at their disposal when Conservatives complain about their treason. Remove McCarthyism as a defense and they're left naked in the breeze... not a pretty sight. Conason, burn in Hell.