Bush as Clinton: A terrible cost

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | Tuesday, July 1, 2003 | editorial

[Search4Truth]

You can choose which Democrat you think will lead us out of Socialism from the illustrious list below.

WHICH DEM WILL YOU SUPPORT IN THE PRIMARY

[SUSSA]

Nope won't vote for a liberal Democrat either. I'm not interested in trading a liberal for another liberal again.

[Search4Truth]

If burning him means; high public approval, the Republican gains in Congress in the mid-term elections, almost certain re-election in 2004, with again more Republican gains in Congress, the Democrats leaderless and issueless, while fighting a global war on terrorism, than I say, flame on!

Would you rather be a staunch Conservative out of power, or compromising Conservative in power?

It took the Clintons 8 years to get us in this mess. You want it all corrected by when?

[TLBSHOW]

That spin is getting real old quick!

[Search4Truth]

I don't listen to or watch Rush or Hannity. Brit Hume and his panel are more to my liking. Sometimes, when I'm in bad mood, I like to watch O'Reilly beat people up. :)

[Search4Truth]

I don't listen to or watch Rush or Hannity. Brit Hume and his panel are more to my liking. Sometimes, when I'm in bad mood, I like to watch O'Reilly beat people up. :)

[Bon mots]

Here it is.

[eskimo]

Lets say you're a parent a have three children, the demons want to come around at election time and destroy two of your children while the repubs want to come around and only destroy one. Which one are you going to vote for? You see, there are some things which can'nt be compromised.

You seem confused. The things you say, in one sentence, that we can not compromise, in the previous sentence, you suggest electing to do just that.

How about ridding our Republic of all the destroyers of our liberties?

[eskimo]

I've been coming to this site for several years now. I really enjoy the interaction. This argument seems to be coming from people who will except anything but reality.

The people of which you speak may be the only realists here. If all other choices you are forced to make for your leader are worse socialist tyrants and you want to live in a constitutional republic then your fight for freedom is, first and foremost, against the socialist tyrants.

[eskimo]

You may have misunderstood me...or I failed to make myself clear. Neither the demons or repubs are going to save this republic. They have both been responsible for bringing us to this point and I will NOT vote for the loss of one more of our freedoms. I will vote for a conservative - third party that belives in the oath him takes when he swears to defend the constitution against ALL ENIMIES FORIEGN AND DOMESTIC. It will not be a wasted vote. A wasted vote would be a vote for more of the same. I apoligize for not making myself clear.

Sorry, perhaps it was I who did not understand.

[Centurion2000]

Would you rather be a staunch Conservative out of power, or compromising Conservative in power?

Compromise yes; SOLD DOWN the river ... no.

Bush is making quite a few mistakes. Unless he swings rightward in 2004 he's going to go the way of his father.

[Uncle Bill]

"George Bush has been pulling a Bill Clinton as of late. Politicos consider it politically savvy. We consider it not very becoming of a Republican who flashed conservative credentials that, on closer inspection, might as well have been manufactured by Hasbro."

Pull string for incrementally facilitating limited government by spending more than any president since the potato famine. Jeans not included.(Spanish speaking version only)

---

"George Bush has been pulling a Bill Clinton as of late."?

As of late? LOL!

[Mortimer Snavely]

It really freaks me out that Bush is thought to be a conservative thinker by many at this forum.

[Ciexyz]

Bump for the Gipper.

[Consort]

Ann Coulter for prez in 2004!

That was a slip-up. The White House is not Ann,s thing.