Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton and Bush (Dum Bass Alert!)
Times Union ^ | June 28, 2003 | Anonymous (you'll see why)

Posted on 06/28/2003 6:50:39 PM PDT by fightinJAG

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: fightinJAG
If you are going to argue their merits as leaders, you have to exclude their personal shortcomings. George W. had a drinking problem and now his opponents are accusing him of being a liar. Bill Clinton's appetite was not for alcohol but he lied and he may have ruined his reputation with the shortcomings in his character.

I wonder if the author is still beating his wife.

Bubba is a sex addict, a serial rapist, and a sexual predator. He used cocaine by the admission of his own brother, Roger. He lied under oath, he lied convincingly(>) on camera wagging his finger at America. He is a manipulator who exhibits phoney emotion ("I feel your pain" and crying on cue, witness the Ron Brown funeral blooper).

Bubba brought character into the discussion when he said that his would be the most ethical administration.

21 posted on 06/29/2003 1:41:24 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
We know what President Bush and President Clinton did in airplanes:

BUSH

SINKY

Which activity takes more brains?

22 posted on 06/29/2003 1:57:16 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
In 1993, the WTC was bombed by terrorists. 8 years later in 2001, the WTC was bombed again (by planes used as an explosive device).

We know how each president responded to these attacks.

23 posted on 06/29/2003 1:59:29 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
Bill Clinton's appetite was not for alcohol

He sure looks bombed on something in this photo. The herpes on his lip indicates some other problems as well.

24 posted on 06/29/2003 2:02:24 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
They look like they just backed into the tow in the rear and the guy on the right looks like he he backed into somthing he didn't want to back into.
25 posted on 06/29/2003 8:03:42 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bump
26 posted on 07/14/2003 2:47:01 PM PDT by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: muggs
ping
27 posted on 07/14/2003 2:48:08 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
Maybe we could agree that Bush and Clinton are both OK -- but different.

Gag, barf, choke,(sound of me keeling over.......)

28 posted on 07/14/2003 2:49:28 PM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
So what did Clinton *DO* in his 8 long years in office?!

Lied, cheated, groped, raped, covered-up, commited treason, put condoms on the Xmas tree, slandered Billy Dale, Got a 200 dollar haircut on the ramp at LAX while countless flights diverted and delayed countless others, testified before a grand jury, an intern, was impeached, signed Kyoto, signed ICC........oh he did a lot. Its just that most of it was criminal.

29 posted on 07/14/2003 2:53:36 PM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Southack
So what did Clinton *DO* in his 8 long years in office?!

Not "what", but rather "whom". And the answer is: anyone he could find (whether they be willing or no).

30 posted on 07/14/2003 2:58:59 PM PDT by kevkrom (Dump the IRS -- support an NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: timestax
p i n g
31 posted on 07/14/2003 8:40:38 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
The difference in character between Clinton and Bush is blinding! First of all, you'd have to be both a moron, and have a memory of 22 seconds not to know that the entire world believed Saddam had WMDs for years. Saddam told us himself that he did. Why do you think he went out and bought all those chemical suits for his military? Because they're fun to wear in the desert?

The democrats climbed all over Bush for not figuring out that the terrorists might hit us, and now they are condemning him because he DID figure out that Saddam might hit us. Maybe we shouldn't have. Maybe we should have allowed the terrorists to get those weapons and take out LA (just think, no more Hollywood weirdos) or New York City. Maybe that would make the dems happy.

It seems that the only thing that will make them happy is if our economy is in the dumps, our military is defeated, and there's a major terrorist strike somewhere in the US. That's really rather pathetic isn't it?

32 posted on 07/14/2003 8:49:20 PM PDT by McGavin999 (Don't be a Freeploader, contribute to FreeRepublic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Well said.
33 posted on 07/15/2003 8:30:13 AM PDT by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson