Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scalia: What a massive disruption of the social order this ruling entails.
US Supreme Court ^ | June 26, 2003 | nwrep

Posted on 06/26/2003 7:37:38 PM PDT by nwrep

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-213 next last
To: Sparta
I can at least understand yours(and Justice Thomas') position.

I cannot support Scalia or the ban-whatever-we-want-by-vote crowd here.
101 posted on 06/26/2003 10:04:15 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Bad laws promote disrespect for the law as a whole.

That sentiment isn't originally mine either.

And aren't you the same one that goes on and on about arresting people in your state for blue law violations?

Yeah, you're the thug cop aren't you?

F16..yeah that's you.
102 posted on 06/26/2003 10:05:26 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
It is not I who am delusional, Dementia, but you.

Morality is objective.

I can tell you right now witout even knowing you that if you are male then you are not a monogamous homosexual.

Unless you define the term as having only one partner tonight.

I don't need to justify my arguments because they are correct.

A good man seeks to define his life by truth. While an immoral man seeks to define truth by his lifestyle.

Those who immerse themselves in moral perversion---usually the same individuals who practice it---are in the latter group
103 posted on 06/26/2003 10:06:02 PM PDT by TFMcGuire (Vote Right and you'll never vote wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
Even if the government wasn't given the authority to forbid prostitution and gay sex, it doesn't have the authority to attempt to regulate the spread of disease by providing health checks to prostitutes and it shouldn't control the insurance companies by forcing them to provide coverage for AIDS ---the reason gays really want their unions blessed by the government ---after demanding the government stay out of their sex lives at first ---is because they want spousal benefits for insurance ---they can marry each other for the AIDS treatments paid for by the health insurance plans.
104 posted on 06/26/2003 10:07:10 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
"Wouldn't this violate the marriage agreement? Seems to me like it's a breach of (the marriage) contract.'

Not according to Bill and Hillary, Haha.

Ok, so you win this one. I still gotcha, 2-1.

105 posted on 06/26/2003 10:09:24 PM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
Well, in the case of your third problem with taxpayers paying for STDs, I would think that the simplest solution is to remove the socalist healthcare system so that you no longer have to pay for the consequences of people's stupid sexual decisions.
106 posted on 06/26/2003 10:11:18 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk

I can at least understand yours(and Justice Thomas') position.

And I agree with you on repealing the sodomy laws. You and I may just disagree on how to do it.

I cannot support Scalia or the ban-whatever-we-want-by-vote crowd here.

Ah yes. The sky is falling, the Republic is dead, chicken little prudish types. The Constitution doesn't address moral issues for a reason. It was meant for every state and city to decide their quality of life issues.

107 posted on 06/26/2003 10:11:28 PM PDT by Sparta (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire
"Scolia is not the reegade here. He is standing for 200+ years of historical Constitutional interpretation."

Oh dontcha know? We have people here who pretend to know the Founding Fathers intentions have been misinterpreted -- they actually intended that:

There should be NO age limitation of sexual consent; sodomy should actually be encouraged; dog was really meant to be more than just man's "best friend."

Such is the enlightened libertarian "mind."

108 posted on 06/26/2003 10:11:36 PM PDT by F16Fighter (What color pants-suit did Hitlery wear today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire
I don't hate them.

I am a Christian.

I love them by warning them that they are engaged in practices which take root in the very soul and change a man's thinking so that he cannot come to God.

Would you love your child by allowing him to destroy himself.

There is hope for all who sin. And the homosexual can be delivered from his deathstyle and set free in Christ.
109 posted on 06/26/2003 10:11:55 PM PDT by TFMcGuire (Vote Right and you'll never vote wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk; F16Fighter; FF578

And aren't you the same one that goes on and on about arresting people in your state for blue law violations?

I think you have F16Fighter confused with FF578.

110 posted on 06/26/2003 10:12:41 PM PDT by Sparta (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
the reason gays really want their unions blessed by the government ---after demanding the government stay out of their sex lives at first ---is because they want spousal benefits for insurance ---they can marry each other for the AIDS treatments paid for by the health insurance plans.

You know, I've seen a lot of discussions on homosexual marriage, different discussions biased on different sides, and I've never heard this argument before. In fact, given that most homosexuals don't have AIDS, I'm not sure how this could be a significant issue.
111 posted on 06/26/2003 10:13:15 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

Well, in the case of your third problem with taxpayers paying for STDs, I would think that the simplest solution is to remove the socalist healthcare system so that you no longer have to pay for the consequences of people's stupid sexual decisions.

That's the best way to avoid most of these moral issues. Just simply shrink the size of government all around.

112 posted on 06/26/2003 10:13:49 PM PDT by Sparta (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
"Think how much worse it would be if the Dems were in power."

I don't see much difference do you? ...I know that if BJ Billy were still in charge doing this crap most of us would be "pegging and pinging"

113 posted on 06/26/2003 10:13:57 PM PDT by alphadog (die commie scum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire
I don't hate them.

I have to doubt the sincerity of your assertion given your previous comment.

Same brave men would have lynched a practicing homo!
114 posted on 06/26/2003 10:15:18 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
......go to the matresses.....

LOL. (hums theme from The Godfather)

115 posted on 06/26/2003 10:15:20 PM PDT by ffusco (Cave Canum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire
Oh Yeah,

Sorry!

Antisodomy laws are not newly being passed in Texas or elsewhere. These laws have always been part of American society.

Our forefathers understood far better than we the destructive nature of homosexuality and outlawed it.

We want to help homosexuals. But we understand that help them or not, we must protect society.
116 posted on 06/26/2003 10:16:10 PM PDT by TFMcGuire (Vote Right and you'll never vote wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
And aren't you the fledging "actor"??

Come on -- Let's see that pretty-boy face on your new profile page again. But again, that would explain your, ahem, "view" of the issue at hand.

117 posted on 06/26/2003 10:16:31 PM PDT by F16Fighter (What color pants-suit did Hitlery wear today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk

Damn, where is that constitutional right to ANYTHING not explicitly listed in the constitution?

But...I thought the Ninth Amendment said I had more rights than those explicitly listed in the constitution. I guess I'm just a naive libertarian.

118 posted on 06/26/2003 10:17:46 PM PDT by Sparta (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Sci Fi Guy
The state passes all sort of laws to outlaw many things that we do with our bodies, prostitution, suicide, drug use, etc.

And the state is dead wrong there too. The state should limit itself to keeping us from preying on each other. Punishing sinners is God's job.

119 posted on 06/26/2003 10:18:10 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire
Talking to yourself is a sign of insanity.
120 posted on 06/26/2003 10:19:18 PM PDT by Sparta (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson