Skip to comments.
What Goes Around Comes Around - The Only Clear Winner in This SCO Versus IBM Case is Microsoft
PBS ^
| JUNE 19, 2003
| Robert X. Cringely
Posted on 06/24/2003 6:07:26 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500, 501-520, 521-540 ... 601-608 next last
To: for-q-clinton
but JAVA=Vendor Lock-in just as much as Windows does. Not to mention a US product. Harr rambles incoherently, nowing little of what he speaks, all the while claiming dominance of the discussion.
To: for-q-clinton
They can change it at their will and they can force all current implementations to update or lose their license. If Java was a standard as TCP/IP, then yes I'd agree, but JAVA=Vendor Lock-in just as much as Windows does. Psssst . . .
Look it up. You won't believe me, so I won't even try.
Java *is* a standard. Sun does *not* control it. The 'Java Community Process' does.
To: Golden Eagle
Yeah, they probably got some pretty good 'tools' we can use, too. Yep, harr just freepmailed me. He confirmed a burning cross is just a tool.
503
posted on
06/30/2003 9:43:34 PM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: for-q-clinton
It's also interesting, that's twice you said I made your point for you, then you turned out to be miserably wrong.
I'm beginning to sense a pattern.
To: Dominic Harr
Java *is* a standard. Sun does *not* control it. The 'Java Community Process' does. Is that your final answer? {hint: you may want to rethink who truly controls java}
505
posted on
06/30/2003 9:45:14 PM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: for-q-clinton
To: Dominic Harr
http://www.jcp.org/en/participation/membership
Participation as a Member requires you or your organization to sign the Java Specification Participation Agreement (JSPA). The JSPA is a one-year, renewable agreement between you and Sun Microsystems, Inc
*Chuckle* *Guffaw*
507
posted on
06/30/2003 9:50:37 PM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: Dominic Harr
There's more, but I'm waiting to bait you in a bit more.
{Hint: a Microsoft sanctioned user's group} {Hint: He who controls the most shares}
508
posted on
06/30/2003 9:52:06 PM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: for-q-clinton
Participation as a Member requires you or your organization to sign the Java Specification Participation Agreement (JSPA). The JSPA is a one-year, renewable agreement between you and Sun Microsystems, Inc That bears repeating.
That's the 'Java Community Process', developers deciding the direction a language should take, not a company.
Sun has opened control of Java up to the community of developers. They no longer control it themselves.
To: Dominic Harr
Hey Harr...what's at the bottom of this page?
http://www.jcp.org/en/participation/membership
Why that wouldn't be the sun logo and wait...who's paying for all this? Is it IBM? Microsoft? No wait it tells me on the bottom of that page:
Site sponsored and powered by Sun Microsystems
Copyright © 1995-2003. All Rights Reserved.
510
posted on
06/30/2003 9:54:14 PM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: for-q-clinton
Oh, please post more like that.
I'd love it.
To: Dominic Harr
Sun has opened control of Java up to the community of developers. They no longer control it themselves. Yeah, Right! And I give my 7 year old son freedom to do whatever he wants as long as I agree with it.
512
posted on
06/30/2003 9:55:39 PM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: for-q-clinton
Sun owns the rights to Java.
They have released control of it to the 'Java Community Process'.
If you want to work with a language controlled by developers, use Java.
To: for-q-clinton
Java is controlled by the developers in the
'Java Community Process'.
.NET is controlled by . . . a marketing machine who just raised prices on it's customers.
The choice is yours.
To: for-q-clinton
Nice link. Harr down in flames, repeateadly and without fail.
To: Dominic Harr
The choice is yours. And we'll be taking none of your snake oil, thank you.
To: Dominic Harr
From javaworld (A pro-java source):
Not everyone in the Java community is as happy as Sun is with the JCP, however. Many small developers, and even some large companies, consider the process neither open nor vendor neutral. Organizations wishing to participate in the JCP must pay annual fees to Sun. Only then can they provide experts to the JCP and actively shape a specification.
517
posted on
06/30/2003 10:00:27 PM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: Golden Eagle
And we'll be taking none of your snake oil, thank you. Oh, I don't know -- the buzz now is that study that showed that 1/2 of all people migrating from VB are moving to Java and not VB.NET. Java is the standard, and growing.
Java is just now mature, and it's really beginning to flex.
To: for-q-clinton
Organizations wishing to participate in the JCP must pay annual fees to Sun. I'd say that's one hell of a stipulation for Harr and his free software budies, what daya think?
To: Dominic Harr
They have released control of it to the 'Java Community Process'. So let me get this straight. Sun released control to an organization which they control? Also are you sure there's no escape clause in there? Like Sun can do whatever they like and the board is only making recommendations to Sun.
520
posted on
06/30/2003 10:03:23 PM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500, 501-520, 521-540 ... 601-608 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson