Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Studies shatter myth about abuse
USA Today ^ | 6/22/2003 | Karen S. Peterson

Posted on 06/23/2003 6:54:20 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:40:50 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2003 6:54:20 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Ah, scholarship begins to catch up with common sense. Figures like the termagent shrew wife do not abound in fiction because their like does not exist in the world.
2 posted on 06/23/2003 7:07:14 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: CatoRenasci
If people are not happy with each other they get divorced. The only people who stay in abusive or loveless marriages do so out of mutual choice, like the Clintons. Their relationship is a poster child for dysfunctional marriages.
4 posted on 06/23/2003 7:09:02 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LimeyRep
Well, here you are again, SUKER!
5 posted on 06/23/2003 7:09:35 AM PDT by wimpycat ("I don't think it's quite fair to condemn a whole program because of a single slip-up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LimeyRep
sorry to shatter illusions republican men are more likley to abuse a wife who has ambitiion or who expresses anti taliban sendiments..Ann coulter is not married too liberal

You almost wrote a coherent sentence.

Almost.

6 posted on 06/23/2003 7:09:42 AM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LimeyRep
Ann Coulter is too liberal for a Free Republic troglodyte, huh? LMAO
7 posted on 06/23/2003 7:09:53 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LimeyRep

So how's life on the dole?

8 posted on 06/23/2003 7:10:40 AM PDT by wimpycat ("I don't think it's quite fair to condemn a whole program because of a single slip-up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
I had a colleague (a cubicle-mate) who was a slight, morose, almost skeletally-thin individual. A physicist. This was in the days before I became a gun nut. We never spoke about guns.

One day I came to work and he was absent. Then the dept. manager told us he had shot his wife (emptied the mag) in front of their kids.

Court testimony revealed that she (a giantess) regularly beat him up. One day he 'snapped'. He testified that he didn't mean to shoot her, only frighten her. But six rounds...the jury might have bought one round. I'm sure they found some shrink to testify that once he began pulling the trigger, he went into some sort of zombie trance.

As far as I know, he's still in the greybar hotel.

--Boris

9 posted on 06/23/2003 7:11:00 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Constitution Day; LimeyRep
Sorry about the disturbance, sir. He escaped early this morning, and we've been tracking him from thread to thread.
10 posted on 06/23/2003 7:12:18 AM PDT by wimpycat ("I don't think it's quite fair to condemn a whole program because of a single slip-up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I skimmed the article...looks like I agree with it too.

WRT:" but he emphasizes injury rates are not the same. "The likelihood of an injury to a woman requiring medical attention is much greater. Men cause more damage."", that depends on whether or not the woman uses a weapon..and that does happen.

Thanks for posting this.

11 posted on 06/23/2003 7:13:55 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Instinctively we all know this is true. Again, these studies are not suggesting that men are as likely injured as women, but women are not always passive victims of abuse.

There is a bunch of sado-masochism going on. There are women and men who will push, say abusive things, belittle a partner who has an uncontrollable temper, and then will play victim.

There is no excuse for physically injuring a partner, however there is an explanation in some cases. When I was in the military, I knew a guy who got into drag out fights with his wife. She gave as good as she took.

Incidentally, the guy never started the fights, at least that I was aware of at the time. She would call him a loser, and throw things at him, and sometimes would shove him, and they would get into physical altercations.

If she ever ended up pressing charges against him for hitting her, I am sure he would have been hauled off to jail, and rightly so( he should have left her, rather than take her abuse), but society would have treated her as a helpless victim, when clearly she wasn't.

If you know that debasing a person, throwing items at a person, and making physical contact with a person in a demeaning way has made them react physically 50 times in a row, on the 51st time when they really get out of control, they should be punished, but you have no right whatsoever to act like a victim.

12 posted on 06/23/2003 7:15:53 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
A pity he didn't have the presence of mind to stop after one round to the center of her chest. I have known a couple of guys whose wives were much larger than they were and who were physically abusive, but neither of them went postal. One divorced his wife, to everyone's delight, and the other out-lived his wife, whose rages probably contributed to her early fatal heart attack.
13 posted on 06/23/2003 7:16:04 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LimeyRep
Is your real name Chief Moose ?
14 posted on 06/23/2003 7:16:15 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
True. Its the result of feminist conditioning that men and women are equal except for minor differences of plumbing. So you ignore the differences in strength and its assumed women can take it and they can also dish it out. I'm not excusing domestic violence here just observing how feminism is at odds with human nature.
15 posted on 06/23/2003 7:16:36 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
But, is he ZOT! yet?
16 posted on 06/23/2003 7:16:52 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Sorry about the disturbance, sir. He escaped early this morning, and we've been tracking him from thread to thread.

sseems he lik to spew rnandom ra ra ra frases like replublican and not conservative enugh tto vote Democrtat! cause what Al Franken is reallu conservative enoug for all america is what is like.

17 posted on 06/23/2003 7:17:53 AM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I'm divided on the feminist issue on at least one issue that I can think of..and that is women's legal and voting rights. Some Guys and gals think women should have never received those rights. I totally disagree. Other than that...I dn't like feminism. Does that make sense? I've not had breakfast yet. :)
18 posted on 06/23/2003 7:18:54 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Get the names and numbers of the numbnuts who wrote this article!

Why are they wasting research dollars on issues that are clear and well established? We've been able to "guide" reasearch on issue related to homosexuality so that there never are findings with the established liberal posiitions, why can't we get the same level of compliance on this subject?

19 posted on 06/23/2003 7:19:13 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
Now he is.
20 posted on 06/23/2003 7:19:23 AM PDT by wimpycat ("I don't think it's quite fair to condemn a whole program because of a single slip-up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson