Skip to comments.
I've forgiven him now [A Brit's take on Hillary's Lying History]
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| June 18, 2003
| Nigel Farndale
Posted on 06/18/2003 8:18:21 AM PDT by Quilla
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Havisham
No, I don't believe it is a hoax. Following the links at the bottom of the article led to a couple of other not-so-flattering Hillary commentaries. Here's a sample:
"The book's index says it all. Hillary Rodham Clinton, clothing of and Hillary Rodham Clinton, hair style changes and crises of, earn between them no fewer than 13 references - that's 12 more, say, than her controversial dabbling in the commodities market."
Source:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2003/06/08/do0802.xml
21
posted on
06/18/2003 9:30:17 AM PDT
by
Quilla
To: subterfuge
In her researching on possible impeachment of Nixon, her recommendation was that he NOT be represented by counsel.....this from a newly minted "lawyer".
To: Quilla
Does she, I ask, blame herself at all for Bill's infidelity? "I had to not only take a hard look at my marriage and my husband: I also had to take a long hard look at myself."
That says it all. Because Bill said, "I cannot have sexual relations with that woman, Hillary Clinton."
23
posted on
06/18/2003 9:33:17 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
To: Free State Four
The psychological term is "projection". This whole article is replete with Hillary projecting her sins and crimes on others. Moreover, Hillary's paranoia is completely substaniated time and time again.
24
posted on
06/18/2003 10:14:24 AM PDT
by
monocle
To: Cobra64
What do you mean woman? Hillary wears those trouser suits so her testicles feel more comfortable. She took a good hard look at herself alright. "Does Bill not have sex with me because he is only wanting sex with a woman?"
I loved the part about Nixon impeached because he abused his office. And poor Bill..... only about sex? What part of lying under oath do they not understand?
She's crazy!
To: nyconse
I've been reading an unflattering biography of Karl Marx and I cannot begin to describe how much he reminds me of Bill Clinton. Almost uncanny. Marx seemed to always make the distinction in his mind as he talked of the "dictatorship of the proletariot" between the leadership and the foot soldiers. He saw no lack of logic between his leadership (being totally in control with no input from the soldiers) and his "belief" in the workers. He was not lying, per se, as he laid out his beliefs. He just didn't see a conflict between being in total control and belief in the workers. The same is true of Bill--and Hill.
26
posted on
06/18/2003 10:44:58 AM PDT
by
twigs
To: monocle
The psychological term is "projection". Thank you. It's good to know. Although, every time she does it, I want to "project". (And that ain't no psychological term!)
To: Quilla
I can't believe that Hillary actually told this interviewer that she was "Shocked. Shocked."
28
posted on
06/18/2003 2:51:44 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Fracas
Wait'll you read this article! LOL. OH Good Lord .. what a load of crap her responses are
But I do like how the reporter has her eye gestures and movements down pat .. LOL
29
posted on
06/19/2003 6:10:06 PM PDT
by
Mo1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson