Posted on 06/17/2003 7:05:07 PM PDT by Pharmboy
Well, I could assume that, or I could assume you just make up whatever you like as you go along, and then make up spurious timewasting cites that don't support your point, as witnessed by the fact that you still have not undertaken the completely trivial (if you are not simply giving us yet another example of what a bald-faced liar would do to double-down his bluff) task of providing a pointer to the location in your cite that shows tangible evidence of plagarism, as the word "plagarism" is understood in the dictionary.
ooops! He did, and you do.
Oh? Could you cite me an example here, or on any other thread on FR where I referred to the bible as "canned tripe", or any other such similar denegration?
One stunk up accurate cite is all you need to provide to demonstrate that you are not, in fact, a vitual river of, to be polite, misinformation compounded by dissembling, intentionally misleading cites.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.