Bush Presidency is Advancing the Progressive Agenda

Sierra Times ^ | 6-17-03 | John Bender

[TLBSHOW]

are you really really sure Rush said that? I mean Howlin wrote it...lol

[justshe]

Who is an ELECTABLE candidate that you will support in 2004?

[carenot]

You know, I think I stumbled into a colony of pure Bush hate.

I don't hate Bush.
I just don't like the stuff he is doing.

[TLBSHOW]

Thats the spirit, you can't beat em then just put your hand out.

[harpseal]

The Conservative RINO Clinton enablers did just that in '92. We really showed Bush 41, didn't we? He'll never fool us again. No way. We threw him out on his ass and replaced him with...............

I am realist enough to understand the vote is a defensive tool at best in the kind of election we will be facing in '04. I actually have a nuber of options I can work activly for GWB's election or I can just vote for him or I can stay home or I can vote for someone else. if I make an honest evaluation that continuing with GWB would be counter productive then am I supposed to vote for him just to keep a Dim out of office when I may view the election of the RAT as possibly so bad that it will mobilize an active resistance taht will forever rid us of traitors. These are quandrys to which I do not have answers yet. If enough people yell at me or others who are facing this quandry then some of us will get stubborn enough we may even vote against Bush no matter who is running.

I would state unequivocally that the measure of your commitment of how much you actually value GWB in office is found in the politeness and reasonableness you show towards those questioning his record who may have voted for him in the past. Alienating people does not do your candidate a service.

[jmc813]

What happened, did you get tired of the moderators ignoring you so now you have to bother JR?

[justshe]

Who is an ELECTABLE candidate you will support in 2004?

[Consort]

I don't hate Bush.
I just don't like the stuff he is doing.

You'll love whoever replaces him if he loses.
You'll the stuff they do.

[gathersnomoss]

Thank you very much for the quote. Having grown up in the 50's/60's as a child I recall seeing abundance leading to selfishness. I recall rude people at the gas lines and stolen fuel.

In the 80's my neighbors in Annapolis would discuss politics over Friday night cocktails. I always fought for what I felt was right when it came to self reliance and independance. Others were apathetic and knew where we were headed.

Today there seems to be less people engaged in spiritual faith and courage in lieu of immediate gratification.

Keep the faith. Thanks for your encouragement.

[Sparta]

Do me a favor? Ping me when a Bot answers any of what you just posted.

[TLBSHOW]

from this question to you..

Which person was negative, and which person was uplifting?

Over Rush or Bush

I say Rush was uplifting because he is going to open lots of eyes to the truth. Like say 20 to 30 million people. Don't forget Rush is a spokesperson for the conservative side on the radio in America...

You see bottom line is this

80 percent support this socialist plan of the Rats and that means an overlap onto FR that support it too.

Shameful and why eyes need opening.

[MileHi]

Alienating people does not do your candidate a service.

Wow, is that a lesson some of the usual suspects on these threads could stand to learn...

Watch yer top knot!

[Howlin]

You shouldn't do that to liberals. They can't handle it. Nasty boy!

[WhiteGuy]

Who is an ELECTABLE candidate you will support in 2004?

---

No office holding member of the gop will cross the line and challenge Bush in the primaries. It would be suicide. BushCo is too powerful.

Any goper who comes off the bench will be crushed with soft money.

So there is no alternative for an idealistic freedom loving American.

I'm voting for RON PAUL in 2004.

[A Vast RightWing Conspirator]

He didn't include $15 Billion for AIDS suppression in Africa. We can certainly afford this, can't we?

[dsutah]

I didn't refer to you as that at all! You didn't read it closely. I merely said that a lot of people on that thread, without me mentioning any names, seemed to sound like those on DU! Many of them did. I didn't mention names; as there were quite a few on that thread! However, many of you seemed to take pleasure in referring to us that support him as socialists, and therefore damaging to the country. And that's not cool either, isn't it?

I believe I said that there was nothing wrong with being mad at the Pres. for something or another. But these poisonous accusations aimed at him for things he hasn't done, and trashing those of us who support and defend him for that reason, are also trashed. If many of his critics can sit and make these ugly comments about him; those who support him, and defend him have as much of a right to defend him, don't we?

[carenot]

No biggie - I've seen so many from well - you know who - that I think I've forgotten basic spelling and grammar.

You forgot?
Y'all are a lot smarter than me!
But that ain't sayin' much. :(

[Mr. Mojo]

I'm voting for RON PAUL in 2004.

Is he running as an Independent, or are you going to write him in?

[Sparta]

He didn't include $15 Billion for AIDS suppression in Africa. We can certainly afford this, can't we?

Sure we can. After all, it's the government's money, not ours. (sarcasm)

[WhiteGuy]

Does it really matter?