Bush Presidency is Advancing the Progressive Agenda

Sierra Times ^ | 6-17-03 | John Bender

[deport]

I'm curious. Who would you like to see as President of The United States? Which candidate, in particular, would you support in 2004 to replace George W. Bush?

---

Not to worry...... little tlbshow is going to support President Bush for re-election come May 2004 in full force. He has so stated on this forum. Doesn't that make you wonder how he can call him, UN Man, socialist, etc. and then turn around and support him for re-election. Tells you a lot about tlbshow's core values doesn't it. He has none. He flips and he flops..... Sorta like which way the wind blows on a particular day...

[certify]

no way

[TLBSHOW]

ONE MORE TIME:

To be honest I would like to see George Bush reverse his current course (Socialist agenda) and do what is right.

AND

there is still time.....tick tock tick tock

Freep Bush BUT GOOD!

[deport]

That's really not an answer to my question. Who would you like to see replace him?

---

Don't expect answers from the show.... that's all he is ... a show without any substance or answers unless it's a cut/paste thing.

[finnman69]

The AMT will be targeted by Bush WHEN he gets a second term. But I suppose you would rather have the AMT intact just to bash Bush some more.

Any self respecting Bush Basher rather have higher taxes than lose the opportunity to bash a Bush

[sauropod]

I wholeheartedly agree with you. Thanks for articulating my point better than i did!

[TLBSHOW]

its too late deport,,, the truth is finally out......

no thanks to the bushbots who have covered for Bush and slammed those that told the truth....

Bush is a big time govt socialist........

[TLBSHOW]

smear me all you want deport but as I said its too late,,,

because the gift is to see the truth

[Aloysius]

The U.S. can’t allow defeated nations to violate ceasefire agreements and get away with it.

I guess if you give a damn about what happens half way accross the world. I don't really care.

[certify]

"compassionate conservatism" LOL

[deport]

Without the gift you have nothing...... it's been proven over and over that you can't answer a question without someone else having written something for you to cut and paste..... Some core values you have.

[finnman69]

I wonder if you think Ann Coulter is a Bush bot too?

[SUSSA]

A Democrat president with a Republican Congress will not move us any farther left than Bush is doing. The good cop/bad cop ploy is wearing thin.

When the "choice" was twiddle dee or twiddle dumb (Dole v Clinton)conservatives had no real choice. Dole was Clinton who never raped anyone that we know of. Clinton was no worse than Dole would have been.

If conservatives get to the point where they see Bush is as liberal as Dole he will be a one term president like his father and Carter.

The way to stop that is to get him to move to the right. I just don't think he will because he believes in big government. However, I believe he cares more about his political career than anything else and he can be moved to the right if he thinks he will lose the base.

[nygoose]

Wait until the assault weapons ban is renewed.

[clamper1797]

I'm totally unhappy about the Patriot Act Nafta, GATT, and especially the porous borders so I'm no Bush BOT BUT I know that we are NOT going to get someone to fix all this in 2004. Maybe we can get a VIABLE Conservative candidate who will address some of these issues in 2008 BUT the thought of Agore or ANY OTHER RAT as president makes me nauseous

[Amelia]

This is a Democrat web site.

You really expected progressives to be conservatives or Republicans?

Bush is not popular with them. He is popular with the progressives who supported Clinton. He and Clinton have the same poll numbers. When two politicians have poll numbers in the high 60s and low 70s more than half those people have to like both.

Well, that's true...

And for anyone to win in this country, it helps A LOT if more than half the people like them.

Politics 101: there are approximately 3 factions in this country - the right (us), the left, and the middle. The right is always going to vote GOP or else a 3rd party, the left is always going to vote Dem or someone such as Nader, and the middle are going to go with whoever appeals to them most, be it Bush or Clinton.

In fact, the key to winning elections is to convince that middle faction to vote for you.

[G.Mason]

""Wise" huh. Your analogy gets my vote for the stupidest one I've seen in 5 years. I'm not kidding either."

You flatter me.

[sauropod]

I can debate it anytime you wish.

That does not excuse the FACT that W. is letting the "roadless area conservation" rule stand. I doubt you even know what that is or why it is a bad idea.

The National Park Service is now a rogue agency in the Western US and in Alaska, terrorizing inholders and ranchers and farmers and the like.

But you don't care since W. is at the helm of Gubbermint.

But then again, i doubt you even know about that. You obviously aren't paying attention.

So, Bush isn't "playing their game." He is about to sign a prescription drug bill for seniors that is as big as the tax cut. Whoopdiefrickindoo!

I blame the Senate for quite a lot. But, Bush is supposed to be the head of the Executive Branch of Gubbermint and he has the power to make positive changes in the way that certain agencies do their business or execute their mission.

Yet he does not do that. Why not?

This isn't just bellyaching. I refuse to be a W. rumpkisser when all the time we are sliding down the path to tyranny.

What about Patriot Acts I and II? What happens if (God Forbid) Hillary becomes El Presidente and Janet RHINO once again becomes Attorney General with those new expanded powers in place? Are you comfortable with that?

[sauropod]

Um-hmm.