1 posted on
06/11/2003 8:03:27 AM PDT by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: blam
Adam and Eve were black?? Than I am hip, have rythm, and I'll try to jump the next pick up game I play.
57 posted on
06/11/2003 10:28:03 AM PDT by
Porterville
(Screw the grammar, full posting ahead.)
To: blam
The skulls are not an exact match to those of people living today; they are slightly larger, longer and have more pronounced brow ridges."Slightly larger, longer and more pronounced" than the average today, or actually larger, longer and more pronounced than any specimen from any normal population living today?
To: blam
Big deal. Pelt me with every fossil in the boneyard. Solve the mind-body problem. Otherwise, forget 'evolution' ever being anywhere near 'provable'. What a joke.
92 posted on
06/11/2003 11:48:28 AM PDT by
HumanaeVitae
(Catholic Epimethean)
To: blam
A few years back I had a roommate from Ethiopia. He didn't look much different from the drawing...
119 posted on
06/11/2003 12:59:31 PM PDT by
null and void
(Who Cries For The Krill?)
To: blam
The Working Years
The Golden Years
To: blam
Would these be the same scientists that say we are going into a global warming or from the scientist that say we are entering another Ice age????
To: blam
The skulls are not an exact match to those of people living today; they are slightly larger, longer and have more pronounced brow ridges.These minor but important differences have prompted the US/Ethiopian research team to assign the skulls to a new subspecies of humans called Homo sapiens idaltu (idaltu means "elder" in the local Afar language).
Oh?? So they've finally found the elusive 'missing link'??
Why not call it 'Homo sapiens graspingus atus strawus'?
How freaking desperate Darwinist movement is...
173 posted on
06/11/2003 4:24:37 PM PDT by
F16Fighter
(Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
To: blam
Note the picture provided by the article (which must be assumed to be of the best specimen available):
Note the top of the head - you can see clearly that it has been pasted up like a jigsaw puzzle in which the pieces do not fit very well. In fact, the nose section and everything but the upper jaw seems to be a paste up job.
This therefore is just another evolutionist hoax trying to make up evidence which they do not have.
To: babylonian
Oldest Human Skulls Found ...contents positively identified as mush.
To: blam
Statement: "Oldest Human Skulls Found"
Response: This should bring things to a head!
208 posted on
06/11/2003 7:22:12 PM PDT by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(Further, the statement assumed)
To: blam; shaggy eel
Can cute little always hungry Muttly have bones when scientists are done ?
229 posted on
06/11/2003 9:07:06 PM PDT by
PoorMuttly
(A Pox on your Monkey)
To: blam
"...scientists reported that the skulls were empty, leading them to conclude that these were primordial Democrats. The finding adds to the growing body of evidence that Democrats were the first to emerge, while Republicans are a more evolved form of life. In other news..."
251 posted on
06/12/2003 8:39:24 AM PDT by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: blam
Interesting drawing. I don't see any change from Ethiopians of today.
272 posted on
06/12/2003 10:19:13 AM PDT by
MEGoody
To: blam
Doesn't resemble any of my ancestors.
To: blam
Their "reconstruction" is wrong.. The nose hole does not fit the picture shown. The nose hole is lower on the face. Very ape like.
I am afraid that they found the skull of just another ape.
376 posted on
02/04/2006 3:22:47 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Islam is medieval fascism, and the Koran is a medieval Mein Kampf.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson