Skip to comments.
CNN's Tucker Carlson Just Said He Would 'Eat His Shoe' On Air if Hillary Sells Out First Printing
Inside Politics ^
| June 10, 2003
| Tucker Carlson
Posted on 06/10/2003 12:19:59 PM PDT by ewing
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: ewing
I'm guessing that all members of the NEA, AFSCME, Teamsters and various other unions have been "encouraged" to buy one or more copies of this utter waste of natural resources.
To: TAP ONLINE
I think Dick Morris should be a special guest host of the DNC buys up all of the copies..
42
posted on
06/10/2003 12:48:12 PM PDT
by
ewing
To: bert
Most of them are retailing for 30% off the list price already.
To: ewing
He's a fool. The AFL-CIO will buy the first printing just to launder cash contributions to her campaign.
44
posted on
06/10/2003 12:50:46 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I"m not always cranky.)
To: Petronski
1.1 million of them at $28.00 a pop?
45
posted on
06/10/2003 12:55:01 PM PDT
by
ewing
To: ewing
She does have enough rich people (maybe a dozen) willing to support her politically who will purchase these books and put them in a warehouse somewhere.
46
posted on
06/10/2003 12:56:55 PM PDT
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: Petronski
Exactly
47
posted on
06/10/2003 12:58:49 PM PDT
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: bert
Of course most places are selling it at a discount already..
48
posted on
06/10/2003 1:00:00 PM PDT
by
ewing
To: ewing
All they have to buy is the rest of the first printing. But yes, hundreds of thousands at $28 or $21 (street price) each. Hell, they built Las Vegas using only the Central States pension fund.
49
posted on
06/10/2003 1:01:01 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I"m not always cranky.)
To: Uncle Sausage
Add University libraries buying 50 copies, high school libraries buyin them for classes-'required reading' etc.
50
posted on
06/10/2003 1:01:33 PM PDT
by
ewing
To: Maelstrom
And give them out free during the 2004 campaign..
51
posted on
06/10/2003 1:02:24 PM PDT
by
ewing
To: Petronski
Or was that the Teamsters pension fund?
52
posted on
06/10/2003 1:02:37 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I"m not always cranky.)
To: Petronski
I cant believe there is that much dirty union money floating around out there, but I should know better..
53
posted on
06/10/2003 1:05:42 PM PDT
by
ewing
To: ewing
I still think this book is going to be on the dollar racks by Christmas... I'm worried that my extremely liberal parents are going to buy them up and give them for Christmas presents. On the bright side, we won't have to buy toilet paper for a while.
To: bert
I thought I read that she got $8 mil for the book and the advance was $2 something million.
The normal markup is 40%. The publisher gets 60%, the seller gets $40.
To: T Minus Four
That about all they will be good for come the holidays..
56
posted on
06/10/2003 2:18:32 PM PDT
by
ewing
To: KellyAdmirer
I wish these guys would chill about Hillary, all this hype just helps her sell more books. I really don't think so. In this case, what's being said is that the book is it's boring and full of lies. I doubt these are sales boosting comments.
57
posted on
06/10/2003 2:25:41 PM PDT
by
laredo44
To: bert
But of course the publisher *wont* sell that many.
Another way to look at it is this: the $8 million represents an advace on royalties. which means at say 20% royalty ( or .2 * 28 = $5.60 a book), the sales will need to be 8 million/$5.60 or 1.42 million to 'break even' on the advance.
Highly unlikely for this work of fiction.
The publisher otoh, is out 8 million and is likely making 60% of $28 (rest for distribution) or $16/book.
manufacturing costs are at least $6 a book, so the bookseller can clear $10/book. The STILL need to sell 800,000 books JUST TO BREAK EVEN.
Again, highly unlikely for this work of fiction.
Conclusion: The $8 million was a well-disguised payoff. Just like Hillary's $100,000 cattle futures winning was.
Viacom's head is a big supporter of Democrat causes. The 'soft money ban' is in effect. This was an illegal attempt to skirt that.
Viacom stockholders should sue the CEO for deriliction of duty and engaging in violation of political campaign finance laws.
58
posted on
06/10/2003 2:46:35 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(We liberated Iraq. Now Let's Free Cuba, North Korea, Iran, China, Tibet, Syria, ...)
To: ewing
The numbers will be met on (everyone repeat after me) the backs of the taxpayers. When will this s*** ever end?
To: bert
666
60
posted on
06/10/2003 3:32:50 PM PDT
by
al baby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson