Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Changing Tide in the Defense Of Scott Peterson:
Findlaw.com ^ | June 10, 2003 | Jonna M. Spilbor

Posted on 06/10/2003 3:03:40 AM PDT by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-265 next last
To: runningbear
THE DATELINE STORY OF LACI WILL BE SHOWING AGAIN JUNE 14TH, 10 ET TIME, 7 PM PST...FYI....

Thank you. I had a hunch this was going to be replayed. Will it be on MSNBC or NBC?

141 posted on 06/10/2003 12:27:08 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
on its fact = on its face
142 posted on 06/10/2003 12:28:23 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
And Roger Clinton.
143 posted on 06/10/2003 12:28:58 PM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Nah..he didn't care about the step sister..he wanted to lurk in the shadows watching the search...he couldn't stay away.

Weird how his mind works.

144 posted on 06/10/2003 12:30:37 PM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
HA!! NOT a great record for Geragos. All his clients get convicted!!
145 posted on 06/10/2003 12:32:00 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Last I heard she was wearing a sports bra, and, jockey panties.
146 posted on 06/10/2003 12:34:25 PM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: joyce11111
hmmm I never heard about the jockey panties. I wonder if they have recovered any other of her clothing or scraps thereof??? I just think this is a HUGELY important detail because it sort of establishes a time frame.
147 posted on 06/10/2003 12:39:52 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Not sure, was on MSNBC site.... Dateline, isn't it on NBC?
148 posted on 06/10/2003 12:42:19 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
YES it was on NBC!! I had thought it was MSNBC but when I turned it on it was Scarborough & Co.!! It was a good show. I couldn't help but notice the quiet confidence of Sharon Rocha and her husband. I was surprised that Brent Rocha was NOT there because he is Laci's full brother. I know her father probably wouldn't because he has said in no uncertain terms that Scott is evil and guilty!! I doubt he could control his emotion. Pretty clear he loved his little girl!!
149 posted on 06/10/2003 12:45:24 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Not sure by on the story I posted here, it states, msnbc

Speaking for Laci story

"An American Tragedy

MSNBC re-airs "Speaking for Laci," Katie Couric's interview with Laci Peterson's family.

Saturday, June 14, 10 p.m. ET.

150 posted on 06/10/2003 12:48:08 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Not sure, was on MSNBC site.... Dateline, isn't it on NBC?

Yes, Dateline airs on NBC, but in the past when they have had a big hit, they've rerun the program on the MSNBC channel. The Tom Brokaw interview with President Bush comes to mind. It was first shown on NBC during the week and then MSNBC replayed it two or three times over the weekend. However, being summer and all, Dateline may replay this particular interview on NBC itself. Something to keep an eye out for if one wants to watch this.

151 posted on 06/10/2003 12:55:12 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: runningbear; Canadian Outrage; bonfire
MSNBC re-airs "Speaking for Laci," Katie Couric's interview with Laci Peterson's family.

Ah--that's what they did for that President Bush interview, too, as I noted. Smart of them and appreciated, I'm sure, by those who missed the program on the first go-round.

152 posted on 06/10/2003 12:57:26 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Thanks cync!!
153 posted on 06/10/2003 12:58:29 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
The newest info I learned from Dateline last night was that SP visited the area he dumped Laci and Conner before they were found. His excuse was he was overseeing the search and what the police were doing. Yeah right, he was probably peeing in his pants every time Scuba divers went out in that bay looking for Laci. SP didn't come down to Modesto when Laci's body was found though.


Rumor had it a while back that Sharon called SP wanting him to come identify Laci's body after it was found. Of course he wouldn't. I wish Katie had asked Sharon if that was true.


Another interesting point was Amy saying he kept a phone glued to his ear when Laci first went missing, while the rest of them were running around like mad calling her name. Now we know he was probably talking to Amber.


I also liked that even guys in prison write to the Rochas with disgust over Laci's murder. They probably tell the Rochas they are praying they get Scott as a cell-mate. If SP doesn't get the death penalty, I see him definitely being somebody's bitch in the big house. He will keep up the facade and marry some idiot that writes to him (like those Menendez boys- who actually seem pretty nice now compared to Scott-HA!).
154 posted on 06/10/2003 1:10:13 PM PDT by Lanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
THE DATELINE STORY OF LACI WILL BE SHOWING AGAIN JUNE 14TH, 10 ET TIME, 7 PM PST...FYI....

Speaking to those who did not see last nights program on Datelline...I must say, I am not enthralled with Katie Couric. Don't know why, but I am not. However, she did do a good show last night. I am very surprised at how it was produced and directed. It was done very well. Great music, alot of footage of Laci growing up, via video's. It was like a very well produced Documentary.

You were really given an introduction to the Rocha family, and were given alot of insight into Laci. Sharon beamed talking of her. Since Laci was 2 yrs. old when her parents divorced, I think her step father must have been a great dad to her from how he talked. There was laughter as they talked about Laci and the things she would do. Her persistent chatter box mouth! The music in the background added to the drama. I can't remember seeing a documentary done like this one. They did this mostly before the interview, but mixed with the interview, they had talk about her.

I must give kudos to Couric for a sensitive interview. Sharon Rocha and her husband are people you feel akin to and comfortable with.

Having said that....I can't remember having a case in the public eye like this one, that has given rise to putting on a production such as this one. I am not enamored with the media on this, and feel it is over kill to a great degree, and have resorted like some of you , not to engolf my day with it. But I know when the Prelim starts, I will be there.

One thing is for sure, the media has power over and above our imagination. But this time, the Dateline program did a FINE JOB, and you should by all means try to watch the repeat. It is worth it, if for nothing else, to try to imagine the depth of grief that has to be endured with the whole country able to watch you as you crumble inside.

God give both families the strength to endure all of it.

155 posted on 06/10/2003 1:16:16 PM PDT by Neenah ("It's always something ! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I wonder when Geragos is going to provide those tapes to PROVE Roger was set up.

Ahhhh, I think they may be in the same place he put the W. Rider sales reciepts...he just can't remember where that drawer is tho.

156 posted on 06/10/2003 1:20:42 PM PDT by Neenah ("It's always something ! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Here's the reason:

Potent Anticancer Agent Found In Hazelnuts
Plant Could Become Alternative Source of Taxol® Precursor

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/04/000410084755.htm

SAN FRANCISCO, March 29 — The active chemical of the anticancer drug Taxol® has unexpectedly been found in hazelnuts, says a team of researchers at the University of Portland in Portland, Oregon. This is the first report of the potent chemical, generically known as paclitaxel, being found in a plant other than the yew tree. This finding could reduce the cost of the commercial drug and make it more readily available, the investigators say. The study is being presented here today at the 219th national meeting of the American Chemical Society, the world’s largest scientific society.

“This is potentially good news for cancer patients,” says Angela M. Hoffman, Ph.D., associate professor of chemistry in the university’s Department of Chemistry and Physics, and a member of the research team. Taxol® is currently one of the biggest-selling cancer drugs worldwide. An alternative source could stimulate competition among drug manufacturers, which could mean cheaper drug prices, explains Hoffman.

The study began as a search for a compound that made certain hazelnut trees resistant to a plant disease known as Eastern Filbert Blight. A chemical analysis of extracts from these hazelnut trees was conducted. Surprisingly, one of the chemicals identified from the extracts was paclitaxel, says Hoffman. The chemical was isolated from the nuts, branches and shells of the trees, she says.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Taxol® for the treatment of ovarian cancer, breast cancer and AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. Researchers originally believed that the drug’s precursor was found only in the bark of the Pacific yew tree, a slow-growing plant found in limited quantities in the Pacific Northwest. As it takes several Pacific yew trees to make a small amount of Taxol® commercially, the trees were once the target of controversy since large scale harvesting could have risked their extinction.

Commercial supplies of Taxol® are now manufactured by a semi-synthetic method that relies on extracts from the leaves of another yew species. Although paclitaxel has been synthesized artificially in the laboratory without using any yew parts, this method is currently too complex and expensive to implement commercially, says Hoffman.

While the supply of Taxol® is generally meeting demand for currently approved cancer treatments and clinical trials, researchers are also finding an increasing number of other medical applications that are boosting demand for it. Clinical studies have shown that the drug is promising for the treatment of psoriasis, polycystic kidney disease, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer’s, among others.

As demand for the anticancer drug continues to increase, researchers may be wise to consider the hazelnut tree as an alternative source of paclitaxel, Hoffman says. Although the amount of the chemical found in a hazelnut tree is about one-tenth that of the yew (6 to 7 micrograms/gram dry weight of hazel vs. 60 to 70 micrograms/gram dry weight of yew), the effort required to extract paclitaxel from these sources is comparable, she says.

For those who are tempted to run to the store and stockpile hazelnuts, Hoffman urges caution. Based on her chemical analysis of raw hazelnuts, she concludes there is probably not enough paclitaxel in a handful of nuts to make a difference medically. The researcher has not tested roasted nuts, and is skeptical of any significant amounts of the chemical being found in hazelnut-flavored products like coffee, tea and candy.

Hoffman’s work, in addition to being funded by the university, is partially funded by the Oregon Hazelnut Commission.

157 posted on 06/10/2003 1:25:05 PM PDT by JudyB1938 (It's a wild world. There's a lot of bad and beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
I must say, I am not enthralled with Katie Couric. Don't know why, but I am not.

I am not enthralled with her, either, and it is because she's a big lib with a heavy bias. (Perky, happy face when speaking with dems. Frowny, concerned face when speaking with a conservative.) However, I agree that the Rocha interview was done well.

158 posted on 06/10/2003 1:28:34 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Oh...it only said jockey underwear...not panties...mea culpa.

I wonder what that means..do you know?

159 posted on 06/10/2003 2:03:19 PM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: ftriggerf
Welcome! We are in agreement as Runningbear does do a great job.
160 posted on 06/10/2003 2:21:38 PM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson