Skip to comments.
Bush Wants House to Pass Child Tax Refunds
Reuters ^
| 06-09-03
Posted on 06/09/2003 5:35:02 PM PDT by Brian S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: goodnesswins
Yes, out of a 350 billion tax cut that's more like 1 trillion over ten years.
To: goldstategop
I dont think its a guarenteed minimum income. THe creedit is earned in that you had to have SOME income and file taxes, I beleive.
IF my assumption is correct, it takes people off of the welfare roles.
42
posted on
06/10/2003 8:12:05 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: Jesse
Spoken like a true doublethink conservative. First off, please don't brand me with your labels. Everyone within the Republican Party or the Conservative movement is not required to think and act exactly alike on every issue. Petty insults and fights over who is more conservative are tearing apart the party from the inside.
That said: it is a fine thing and quite commendable to pursue, promote, and vote a purist philosophical line. However, there is also something to be said for political pragmatism. The cost of this payment is low in terms of the budget, and even in terms of its net percentage of the overall tax relief package. It is, however, popular and presents a potential noisy problem in '04. Why not turn the situation into a positive? Why not use the issue to gain back some of what was lost in conference? The tax relief package will now certainly total MORE than the $350BB the libs insisted was a hard cap, and the President can claim even more political credit for tax policy.
Like it or not politics is a game of compromise. Those who seize the winning issues can dominate the debate and better forward their preferred agenda. To sell the idea that tax cuts are in fact good for everyone goes a long way towards eliminating sunsets and passing even more relief. I apologize not an ounce for being glad that this president is better at the game than the libs.
43
posted on
06/10/2003 2:54:28 PM PDT
by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: Satadru
It's called buying votes. Now, please don't forget to leave your wallet with the valet at the door. Thank you.
To: almcbean
>>Anybody know of a viable,non-pandering political party that I can join?<<
A monkey pox on both their houses.
45
posted on
06/10/2003 8:49:13 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been banned.)
To: shawnlaw
lOOK,it is the lower and middle class of working people,who pay most of the interest rates in this country.The upper middle and upper class people usually has enough money to pay for most of their purchases therefore,they have more money to spend.Why should they be getting a tax break? Most lower class Americans makes 5.15 per hour,compared to say 50.000 yrly.upwards, where the lower income citizens have too pay three times the intrest rates, to have anything of value.Therefore putting more money into the econimy.So why shouldn't they get the tax break also? GET OVER IT
To: fooman
i'm i able to get this child tax credit, because i'm low imcome.
47
posted on
08/04/2003 11:38:47 PM PDT
by
rolano2
To: GET OVER IT
So why shouldn't they get the tax break also? GET OVER IT Because, by definition, it is NOT a tax break. Call it a welfare payment, call it charity, call it "Bush wants to buy your vote" but calling it a tax break is a LIE.
Notice no one seems to be concerned about all those people with children who make over 120k. They aren't getting a "tax break" and they actually pay income taxes.
48
posted on
08/05/2003 12:27:40 AM PDT
by
Dianna
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson