John Dean: Should Bush Be Impeached for Missing WMDs? [Scandal is Worse than Watergate]

Find Law's Legal Commentary ^ | 6/7/03 | John Dean

[11th Earl of Mar]

While Bush narrowly escaped being dragged into Enron

Just in case anybody is wondering how badly liberals are wanting Bush's scalp.

[Im Your Huckleberry]

PUH-LEEEEZE!

Yeah, let 'em keep hoping. Ain't gonna work. If they thought the country was against going after Beelzebubba, then just let 'em try going after a President like Bush with his currently popularity and the public's understanding that what we're doing is for our own protection and national security.

Yeah, go ahead, Demonazis, try it...

[jocko12]

WHAT SCANDAL!!!!

[Lancey Howard]

You would think a guy who is married to an aging prostitute would have better things to do than concoct Democrat fantasies. On the other hand, these may be the only fantasies Dean has left.

[Young Rhino]

Time to put John Dean alone in a room with G. Gordon Liddy...actually, it is about 30 years overdue.

[rintense]

Oh give me a break. If they impeach Bush, they have to impeach Clinton- AGAIN. It's the same intel. Yet, no one called for Clinton's head. Oh, I forget. Monica did. And that's why he attacked Iraq.

[Pokey78]

John Dean. BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

The libs are running of straws to grasp.

[11th Earl of Mar]

Time to put John Dean alone in a room with G. Gordon Liddy...

Great pay per view idea.

And it would be a better celebrity boxing match than Tonya Harding and Paula Jones.

[Allegra]

Oh, cry me a freakin' river, John Dean.

These guys reek of desperation.

[goose1]

Give me a break I hope they try it it will blow up right in the RATS face.These liberals are really scrapping the bottom of the barrel now.

[The Iguana]

...and John Dean should be indicted for serial perjury.

[The Great Satan]

Transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike

[altura]

Is John Dean writing a book?

[Arkie2]

And it would take about thirty seconds.

[artsie]

I actually heard a guy on MSNBC this very morning bring up, as he called it, the I word. Can't recall his name but he is a regular on the weekends for politics. I almost hit the floor. Someone seriously said this could lead to impeachment.

[theFIRMbss]

>Time to put John Dean alone in a room with G. Gordon Liddy...actually, it is about 30 years overdue.

John lives in Beverly Hills, California with his wife Maureen. He works as writer, lecturer and private investment banker. [FindLaw's Dean bio]

New allegations have emerged in hundreds of papers filed recently in United States District Court in Washington that allegedly link Dean's wife Maureen to a Capitol Hill sex ring. If true, the allegations could force the Deans to back out of the $150 million libel suit they filed five years ago against St. Martin's Press Inc., publishers of Silent Coup, and its authors Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin. The new charges, hotly denied by Dean, are intended to support what Liddy and others have been saying: The Watergate break-in had nothing to do with President Nixon but was a personal enterprise by Dean to protect his then-girlfriend Maureen by removing information that linked her to a call-girl ring run out of the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate. ["WATERGATE REVISITED - Watergate Figures Fight Again in the Courtroom," By Timothy W. Maier]

[HitmanLV]

Truth is, if there are no WMD in Iraq, we have lost a ton of credibility - we either lied or were just very wrong, and in either case it's not very good.

I think WMD will be found in the coming weeks, actually I think the Bush-Blair alliance is doing a classic 'rope-a-dope.' I think they are sitting on info very damning to Iraq until we get more evidence and verify other evidence. They are giving the bad guys enough rope to really hang themselves.

At least I hope that's the case - they stuck their necks out, and if they knew they were wrong it was insane for them to posture as much as they did. It would likely mean Blair's political career, and could threaten Bush' reelection - though in the latter case I think most americans don't care. In any case, if he knowingly decieved us, that was a rotten thing to do and it certainly couldn't help him.

[FairOpinion]

So let's start quoting the Democrats.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/924988/posts

Saddam Hussein has stockpiled, weaponized, and used chemical and biological weapons. And he has made no secret of his desire to acquire nuclear weapons. He has ignored international agreements and frustrated the efforts of international inspectors, and his ambitions today are as unrelenting as they have ever been.

We do know, however, that Iraq has weaponized thousands of gallons of anthrax and other deadly biological agents. We know that Iraq maintains stockpiles of some of world’s deadliest chemical weapons, including VX, sarin and mustard gas. We know that Iraq is developing deadlier ways to deliver these horrible weapons, including unmanned drones and long-range ballistic missiles. And we know that Saddam Hussein is committed to one day possessing nuclear weapons. If that should happen, instead of simply bullying the Gulf region, he could dominate it. Instead of threatening only his neighbors, he would become a grave threat to US security and to global security. The threat posed by Saddam Hussein may not be imminent. But it is real. It is growing. And it cannot be ignored. ...

-- Tom Daschle, October 11, 2002


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/924722/posts

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

Signed by prominent Democrats, October 9, 1998, a letter to Clinton.

[altura]

The very thought of Gordon Liddy makes John Dean extremely nervous.

[maxwell]

I don't get it. I thought the military was over there uncovering WMDs just one stash right after the other. Every time I turned around there was a new post on FR about "this or that found", so I don't understand this hoopla about "where's the weapons".