Skip to comments.
The Pro-Life Movement's Problem With Morality
The Washington Dispatch ^
| June 6, 2003
| Cathryn Crawford
Posted on 06/06/2003 10:32:33 AM PDT by Cathryn Crawford
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460 ... 641-643 next last
To: Clint N. Suhks
Do your parents know you're on the internet?I am my parents.
421
posted on
06/06/2003 3:47:55 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I've decided to cut back my tagline, one word at a)
To: Cathryn Crawford
I'm not a public school product
You don't know what you're missing at a government indoctrination center publik school.
I was homeschooled in my early years and I finished at private prep school. Maybe that's why I don't subscribe to the moral relativism.
I tend to find people who were schooled at private schools to be more liberal both socially and politically. I don't know why, but it just seems that way.
422
posted on
06/06/2003 3:47:59 PM PDT
by
Sparta
(Tagline removed by moderator)
To: Qwerty
"You get a chance to look up "murder" yet?" Some of the more severe prolifers here have a problem with the legal definition thereof...it doesn't fit theirs. There was a discussion of this a few nights ago.
Another of their favorites is calling abortion providers "serial killers", in complete ignorance of the term's true meaning and definition.
Perhaps it's nitpicking on my part, but I hate it when someone misuses words to twist an argument. Leftist do this all too often and we should not emulate them.
423
posted on
06/06/2003 3:52:08 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(LS-1's FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Sparta
I tend to find people who were schooled at private schools to be more liberal both socially and politically Of course you do. They come from upper middle and upper class homes, mostly ruling elite and mostly liberal.
424
posted on
06/06/2003 3:52:59 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(gazing at shadows)
To: Qwerty
Are you misunderstanding logic on purpose?No just showing you your silly statement was wrong. The logic as per Ms. Hyperbole was that abortion causes cancer so don't do abortions, and that logic changed with little effort. Ergo logic changes.
To: Lazamataz
I am my parents. I feel sorry for your kids then, not to bright and a little immature.
To: Long Cut
"Some of the more severe prolifers here have a problem with the legal definition thereof...it doesn't fit theirs."
Yes, but it's still so odd. Arguing with me, I can understand. Arguing with the dictionary.. that's a problem.
427
posted on
06/06/2003 3:55:55 PM PDT
by
Qwerty
("Murder, honey.. a group of crows is called a murder...")
To: LanPB01
Did you find it logical? I'm flattered.
428
posted on
06/06/2003 3:57:03 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Whatever you say, dear.
429
posted on
06/06/2003 3:57:50 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.)
To: Clint N. Suhks
I feel sorry for anyone who has to associate with you in any capacity.
430
posted on
06/06/2003 3:58:38 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I've decided to cut back my tagline, one word at a)
To: Qwerty
You get a chance to look up "murder" yet? There's more to life than the dictionary, one is common sense to which you apparently lack in this point.
To: Sparta
The school was fairly conservative; I was extremely conservative. I liked to get into theological and ideological arguments with my teachers. I especially liked it when I won. :-)
432
posted on
06/06/2003 3:59:20 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.)
To: Lazamataz
Laz, Laz, Laz!
You're killing him! ;-)
433
posted on
06/06/2003 4:00:00 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.)
To: k2blader
re your #112
: Stating that abortion is morally wrong is not logical?
I'm glad to see someone point this out. I think perhaps CC should substititue the word logic with reason. Perhaps she should examine how human reason is often corrupted by human will.
Either objective morality exists or it doesn't. If it does,it should be understandable through human reason. If it doesn't, we're well down the road to nihilism.
To: Clint N. Suhks
"No just showing you your silly statement was wrong."
No, Clint. You are wrong.
"The logic as per Ms. Hyperbole was that abortion causes cancer so don't do abortions, and that logic changed with little effort."
Clint.. the logic was always "Avoid getting cancer, it can kill you". That particular bit of logic is still sound, only you can't apply it in this situation because abortion may not be linked to cancer. It is NOT the only logical argument against cancer.
This isn't hard. You should be able to work it out.
435
posted on
06/06/2003 4:01:35 PM PDT
by
Qwerty
("Murder, honey.. a group of crows is called a murder...")
To: Lazamataz
Laz, you've always been 'somebody' to us here on FR that care..
And if I might return the compliment, you've always been a nobody.
Ahh, but there you see the difference tween us. I've never claimed to be anybody, as you do.
436
posted on
06/06/2003 4:02:33 PM PDT
by
tpaine
(Really, I'm trying to be a 'decent human being', but me flesh is weak.)
Did anyone ever notice how most acts that have traditionally been defined as immoral have negative psychological, physical and/or spiritual consequences for individuals? Maybe there's a connection there somewhere....
To: Clint N. Suhks
"There's more to life than the dictionary, one is common sense to which you apparently lack in this point."
Ok, Clint. Forget the dictionary, it all depends on what the definition of "is" is, anyway. Let us just feeeeeeel our way through conversation, shall we?
Look, if you want to participate in conversations, you're going to have to master English. Especially basic words.
438
posted on
06/06/2003 4:04:18 PM PDT
by
Qwerty
("Murder, honey.. a group of crows is called a murder...")
To: Cathryn Crawford
there are many different divisions within the pro-life movement, including Democrats, gays, lesbians, feminists, and environmentalistsDon't forget all 100 of us atheist pro-lifers.
439
posted on
06/06/2003 4:04:33 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: xm177e2
I haven't forgotten you guys. I meant to include you in that list, but somehow I missed it.
440
posted on
06/06/2003 4:05:26 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460 ... 641-643 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson