Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't ever break a deal with Uncle Sam, By Daniel Pipes
Jerusalem Post ^ | June 2, 2003 | Daniel Pipes

Posted on 06/03/2003 8:57:58 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: FairOpinion
isn't it a sad state of affairs when it is honestly believed by millions that one political party would prefer a bad economy, would prefer civil unrest, would prefer American servicemen and women die, all to be elected?

I believe this is true of the current crop of dems, sadly.

41 posted on 06/04/2003 4:43:59 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
That's not a bad retort on the WMD issue...

"We haven't found Saddam either, but we know he was in Iraq too!"
42 posted on 06/04/2003 4:50:52 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
"Where can I contribute to the President Boris election fund?"

You can't...but there is a "Send Boris to Hawaii for Easter" campaign.

43 posted on 06/04/2003 5:45:26 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
ChiComs got you (and a lot others) fooled good.

They aren't going to war over Taiwan.

Thye like people to believe how "serious" they are and how they are "patient" and think in long term etc...

It's a scam.

44 posted on 06/04/2003 6:37:29 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: boris
(2) Red Chinese threats: "We are very fond of Los Angeles, thanks for asking. Any attack on U.S. soil will result in the reduction of Beijing to a glass parking lot...for starters."

Your left out: And by the way, the President will be visiting his counterpart in Taipei next week and plan to have a nice meeting in LA next year as well.

45 posted on 06/04/2003 6:40:15 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Actually Comrade Kirk, arguments based on the UN resolutions and Iraq's failure to comply were made.
46 posted on 06/04/2003 6:45:56 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Lefties dont care about the truth
their only concern with events is being able to use them as rationalizations for seizing power
47 posted on 06/04/2003 7:03:42 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
no, read it again without your slant, i said it appears that saddam was a weapon of mass destruction and justified ousting him...

teeman
48 posted on 06/04/2003 7:12:54 PM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
No one has yet argued that because Saddam has not been located, he never existed. But that is what some are saying about the coalition forces' not finding actual WMD.

Yes, I did.

49 posted on 06/04/2003 7:58:55 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
.
50 posted on 06/05/2003 10:51:29 PM PDT by nutmeg (USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson