Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: LdSentinal
It's the paper they all want to work for and, in the meantime, emulate. "Its authority ... isn't just journalistic; it's downright ontological,...It is scarcely an exaggeration to say that the Times defines public reality."
Man, someone sure is full of themselves. Maybe they are stuck in a time warp.
Even when I was wanting to work in the newspaper industry, I didn't want to work for the NYT. I wanted to work for USA Today's Sports bureau.
Besides, maybe he doesn't realize that readers are down, advertising is down, and people can just as easily get their news from better balanced and ethical media.
32 posted on
06/01/2003 6:19:59 AM PDT by
Maigrey
(Member of the Dose's Jesus Freaks, Jack Straw Fan Club, and Gonzo News Service)
To: LdSentinal
"It is scarcely an exaggeration to say that the Times defines public reality"No. Truth defines reality--public or otherwise.
"Why are journalists so glum? Because The New York Times is their gold standard."
I don't suppose it occurred to them to set truth as their standard.
33 posted on
06/01/2003 6:23:20 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
(Vote Democrat--the party of fools and scoundrels--to commit national, and personal, suicide!)
To: LdSentinal
"The Times sets the news agenda that everyone else follows.""Our basic awareness of what is going on in the world derives in large part from the Times."
This, of course, is an acknowledgement that the American "newsmedia" is a propaganda organ that speaks with one voice and from one point of view.
And this is exactly why the American public sees it as ridiculous and holds its so-called "journalists" in such contempt.
Evidently, all this is beyond the comprehension of these "journalists".
34 posted on
06/01/2003 6:31:05 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
(Vote Democrat--the party of fools and scoundrels--to commit national, and personal, suicide!)
To: LdSentinal
;"It is scarcely an exaggeration to say that the Times
;defines public reality."
;
;This will certainly come as news to the "public," 99% of
;which doesn't read the paper.
Roger that. 'Till the Blair scandle broke I thought the NYT was 'just another newspaper'. One that, based on the few stories I'd seen from it, was either completely delusional or else a mouthpiece for the office of misinformation.
I had no idea that they were "the grey lady" or "the paper of record".
Exactly who believes such lines ? Oh right. The editors at the NYT.
35 posted on
06/01/2003 7:18:27 AM PDT by
festus
To: LdSentinal
Bump for later
To: LdSentinal
The American people do not need the New York Times to re-establish it's credibility. We need an honest press that is free of bias and will report the truth. I beleive that is true free speech.
45 posted on
06/01/2003 9:55:22 AM PDT by
freekitty
(W)
To: LdSentinal
The entire country has laughed at the weight the "profession" gave to the NYT. We've almost rolled on the floor laughing as the media across the country obediently fell in line with whatever the NYT said. That's one of the reasons the profession of journalism has fallen into such disregard by the public.
Basically, the media has behaved much like the french, insulting their best customers and then wondering why their customers have looked elsewhere.
To: LdSentinal
Incredible!
47 posted on
06/01/2003 10:10:00 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
("Don't believe everything you read in the newspapers." ----- Jayson Blair)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson