Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: Presidents' private lives are fair game to a point
Boston.com ^ | 5-28-03 | Martin Finucane

Posted on 05/28/2003 7:09:03 PM PDT by Paul Atreides

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:09:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Paul Atreides
I wish that more people would STRONGLY emphasize the point that Clinton shows definite signs of a number of very serious psychiatric disorders instead of letting him strut around like an uncontested god for hundreds of thousands of dollars a night. His continuing increase in craziness in attempts to justify his craziness seems to have no negative effect.
41 posted on 05/28/2003 8:43:02 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
''It's a good thing we've got the term limits or you'd have had to throw me out,'' he said.

Well, we tried to throw you out. Unfortunately, it didn't work.

42 posted on 05/28/2003 8:44:21 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Honey, why doesn't this magnet pick up this floppy disk?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Hillary has been sounding shrill and borderline nuts.

--------------------

Hell yes! For 35 years.

43 posted on 05/28/2003 8:45:56 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RLK
We all KNOW he's nuts. The democrats and the media refuse to see it, however. It's going to take a lot worse stuff from him before they are willing to admit they propped up a nut case for 8 years.
44 posted on 05/28/2003 8:48:41 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Dr. John Witherspoon, the first president of Princeton University and a signer of the Declaration of Independence said it best: "What a man is in private is what he is in public." Character counts!
45 posted on 05/28/2003 8:52:25 PM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
''The thing that I think is difficult to convey is how everything happens at once,'' he said. ''And how you're supposed to keep sort of centered in an almost Zen-like state, no matter what the incoming fire is, so that you can do first every day for the eight years ... what seems best for the country and the future of the world.

Sorry, Zen master(or is that sink master?), but for 8 years you did "first every day" what seemed best for your "political viability" not the country. Your two terms as class president were nothing more than 8 years of scandal, spin and damage control.

''For a couple of months,'' he quipped, ''I was disoriented when I walked in a room and they didn't play a song anymore.

That wasn't a "quip". A quip is a witty or funny response made on the spur of the moment. Since the rapist left office he has been quoted as saying this almost every day.

46 posted on 05/28/2003 8:53:32 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
What concerns me is that basis of the Clinton arguments are are uncontested by nearly everyone, including our present president.

I think President Bush has more important thinks to do nowadays than to take a position on a hypothetical amendment that will never see the light of day. It's better for Clinton to make himself look foolish demonstrating exactly why we have a 22nd amendment.

I'm not concerned. No proposed consititional amendment repealing the 22n amendment will even make it out of committee much less get a 2/3rds vote on on the floor of either the House or Senate. Notice how after the presidential election of 2000 talk of repealing the Electoral College died out rather soon before any committee even had hearings on the subject? Remember also, that a large number of senators look in the mirror each morning and think they see the next president of the United States. If the 22nd amendment were repealed their liklihood of every getting to be president decreases even more.

If Gore's showing in the 2000 elections were a proxy for a Clinton third term, Clinton is out of luck to repeal the 22nd amendment. Only 20 states went to Gore, while it takes 38 states to ratify an amendment. Even if every the legislature of every state that voted for Gore ratified, 60% of the states that voted against Gore would also have to ratify (18 out of 30). The founding fathers were very wise to divide power. I really am not going to lose any sleep over this.

47 posted on 05/28/2003 9:03:55 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"What an jerk."

And being interviewed by another one, Beschloss, the court historian of CNN and PBS who agrees with the Hildabeast's call for abolishing the electoral college and who claims he had "no preference" for either candidate in the 2000 presidential race. Uh huh.

48 posted on 05/29/2003 1:36:36 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson