Skip to comments.
Muslim cites beliefs as ID photo trial begins (new revelations)
MIami Herald ^
| May 28, 2003
| PHIL LONG
Posted on 05/28/2003 7:50:39 AM PDT by FairOpinion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Note that apparently her religion doesn't keep her from abusing children...
"Freeman acknowledged she was photographed without a veil after her arrest in 1998 in Decatur, Ill., on a domestic battery charge involving one of the twin 3-year-old sisters who were in her foster care.
The Associated Press reported that the children were removed from her home. Child-welfare workers told investigators in Decatur that Freeman and her husband had used their claims of religious modesty to hinder them from looking for bruises on the girls, according to Decatur police records.
Thorpe didn't allow many of the facts about Freeman's arrest into evidence."
To: FairOpinion
I didn't realize that you could pick and choose which laws you wanted to obey and which ones you don't regard as appropriate. I think I'll drive 100 MPH and tell the court it is my inner religion coming out. Think it will work?
2
posted on
05/28/2003 7:56:45 AM PDT
by
zip
To: FairOpinion
Hmmm, Driving is a priviledge, not a right. Besides, if she is that fundamental in her faith, she isn't allowed to drive anyway!
3
posted on
05/28/2003 7:57:15 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Do you have to be Tolerant to the Intolerant?)
To: FairOpinion
If she really wants to practice her newfound faith as a Muslim woman, then she should give up driving altogher. No Muslim nations allow women to drive. She also should never be seen with a man in public, unless it's her husband or father or brother. Otherwise, she is violating a major tenet of veiled Muslim women.
To: FairOpinion
Depending on the outcome of this case, I see shortly there shall be a case in which because of a nervous disorder, a person will be able to completely cover his face (okay, maybe peep holes for the eyes) rather than be photographed for a license, passport, etc. The ACLU will rush to the assistance of this dis-abled victim and pronounce that the State has no compelling interest in humiliating the individual, etc. Maybe we could start a pool on how long it will take for this to occur - there is no doubt it will occur, only the timing is in doubt.
5
posted on
05/28/2003 7:58:15 AM PDT
by
MarkT
To: FairOpinion
What is she doing speaking in public? She needs a beating. Where's the husband?
To: MarkT
If there is a ruling in favor of her, I will be the first to don on my Freddy Kruger mask and redo my License!!!
7
posted on
05/28/2003 7:59:25 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Do you have to be Tolerant to the Intolerant?)
To: FairOpinion
Your papers, please...
I heard this ACLU guy say last night on a news program that FL has issued "millions" of non-photo DL's that are still valid. I have to say, that if what he says is true, then she has a right to gripe, legit or not.
8
posted on
05/28/2003 7:59:35 AM PDT
by
aardvark1
To: FairOpinion
When she buys an item like cereal that has a person's photograph on the box, she crosses off the face with a magic marker. OK I can accept some religious beliefs, but this says dingbat and I don't think it's in the Koran.
9
posted on
05/28/2003 8:00:07 AM PDT
by
Drango
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those that understand binaries, and those that don't.)
To: zip
>I think I'll drive 100 MPH and tell the court it is my inner religion coming out...
"We in the Church of the Divine Loony
believe in the power of prayer
to turn the head purple! Ha, ha, ha . . . "
To: Drango
Absolutely!
11
posted on
05/28/2003 8:01:32 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: aardvark1
Well, Florida did issue the first license with the viel, then revoked it after 9-11. That would be a bit hypocritical. Though it should have never been issued in the first place.
12
posted on
05/28/2003 8:01:55 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Do you have to be Tolerant to the Intolerant?)
To: FairOpinion
No picture, no driver's license. Apparently, this is more an attempt to conceal links with other forms of bad behavior, than it is modesty in any sense. Conformity is the means to obtaining privilege in this society. Non-conformists are denied privilege. Privilege is defined as in excess of basic rights, to be granted a preference over another.
To: FairOpinion
On the witness stand, Freeman said she has no photos in her house. When she buys an item like cereal that has a person's photograph on the box, she crosses off the face with a magic markerAnd they let this kook have foster children? Boy, we really screen these foster parents well, don't we? So she was photographed w/o a veil when she was charged with domestic battery? Guess the "I'm so religious" angle doesn't go over well with that deal.
I'm curious to find out what she did to the little girl. How is that considered domestic battery, and not child abuse?
To: FairOpinion
She's looking to make some $$$$ out of a lawsuit on this most compelling issue. (/sarcasm)
15
posted on
05/28/2003 8:02:40 AM PDT
by
dennisw
To: TheCrusader
This is pure BS. I go to the mall in Dearborn, Michigan and the Muslim ladies wear head scarves but not face masks. This is not a religious requirement but an optional stringency.
What most Muslim women wear:
A face covering like the one below would make operating a vehicle difficult by blocking perpheral vision. Definitely a road hazard.
16
posted on
05/28/2003 8:06:26 AM PDT
by
Alouette
(Why is it called "International Law" if only Israel and the United States are expected to keep it?)
To: FairOpinion
"the ultimate in self-respect and feminism"
Well, there's a statement I never expected to see from someone defending their Muslim faith. "The ultimate in subservience and being made the property of my male master", maybe.
17
posted on
05/28/2003 8:06:42 AM PDT
by
LanPB01
To: Zavien Doombringer
what else can you expect from a state that srew up the elctions?
To: FairOpinion
Thorpe is deciding the case. Even if the prior arrests don't go into the record, Thorpse knows about them.
I hope Thorpe doesn't being the process of Islamicizing our laws.
To: lady lawyer
That's "doesn't BEGIN the process"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson