Skip to comments.
CA: Tax-cutting Prop. 13 sent chill through community libraries
Mercury News ^
| 5/26/03
| Patrick May
Posted on 05/26/2003 10:02:29 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:31:16 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: boris
Let me expand:
The one near me: Chatsworth, Corner of Variel and Devonshire.
The one on my way to work out: Sherman Way, West of DeSoto.
And BTW, in Woodland Hills (near my barber) on Ventura Boulevard. They demolished the old one there and are constructing a huge new one.
--Boris
21
posted on
05/26/2003 7:01:34 PM PDT
by
boris
(Education is always painful; pain is always educational)
To: absalom01
I don't have a problem with low taxes. But with Proposition 13, if you've got two identical houses on the same street, the owners could pay radically different property taxes if one bought his house last year and the other has lived in his house for 35 years. This isn't fair, and it's a major problem with Prop 13. If Prop 13 said that the total property tax receipts in a given jurisdiction couldn't rise more than a certain percentage, that'd be one thing. But it basically keeps the older people who haven't moved recently paying much lower taxes than younger families. Because of this, younger families have to pay a lot more in property taxes.
22
posted on
05/26/2003 7:08:19 PM PDT
by
Koblenz
(There's usually a free market solution)
To: NormsRevenge; Ernest_at_the_Beach
This piece is just another hit piece on Prop 13. Redding is in the process of erecting a multi million FOOT BRIDGE designed by a mad Italian Architect across the Sacremento River. It is so convoluted that the contractor is about to throw up his hands on the project.
To: tubebender
That's a mad Spanish architect, if you please.
To: Koblenz
This isn't fair, and it's a major problem with Prop 13. Yes, the "howdy stranger" aspect of prop 13 has been played to the hilt by those who would use any excuse to raise taxes.
But, that was, and remains, a red herring. We live in an imperfect world, and freezing property taxes a-la prop 13 is the only viable method of hanging on to the purse strings. A floating average would a) damage the old folks on fixed incomes, and b) be utterly unverifiable on an individual basis. The only other viable solution would be to repeal property taxes altogether, and that's just not politically possible.
Hate to appeal to realpolitik, but the fact is that those who want to 'correct' prop 13, are only trying to find a way to get around the cap on revenue that it created.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson