Skip to comments.
Clintonistas on 9/11 Commission Hunt for Bush Cover-up
newsmax ^
| May 24, 2003
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 05/24/2003 6:10:13 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
1
posted on
05/24/2003 6:10:13 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW
Ms. Gorelick was Hillary Clinton's eyes You can't make up stuff like this.
To: TLBSHOW
and former deputy attorney general Jamie GorelickGorelick is really this clowns name?
3
posted on
05/24/2003 6:13:25 PM PDT
by
putupon
(nothing more to read here, move along)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: TLBSHOW
This committee looks like the dem's best hope for impacting the 2004 election. The downside for them is that normal minded people will not only refuse to blame the administration for 9/11, but will see the hatred of anyone who asserts it, punishing them accordingly.
5
posted on
05/24/2003 6:21:10 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(Vice is nice, but virtue can hurt you. --Bill Bennett)
To: TLBSHOW
Ms. Gorelick was Hillary Clinton's eyes Her relationship to Ms. Gore is left as an exercise for the reader...
6
posted on
05/24/2003 6:22:10 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: TLBSHOW
Clinton trying to shift his blame on to Bush. The Dimocommiecrats could not shove their socialism/communism
down our throats after the 2000 election was decided so they were most likely in cahoutes with the terrorists planning 09/11/01!!!! What the Dimocommiecrats have failed
to take into account is that the vast amount of Americans
still value freedom over tyranny!!!!
7
posted on
05/24/2003 6:24:17 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: xbar
That Ben-Veniste was out for blood!
Sounds like it to me.
8
posted on
05/24/2003 6:24:27 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: putupon
Jamie Gorelick is one of Hillary's DYKE bitches!
9
posted on
05/24/2003 6:25:30 PM PDT
by
harpu
To: TLBSHOW
Regardless of these 2 bozos - who the dems think will insulate them from any accountability for 9/11 - I believe this will end up backfiring on the dems.
10
posted on
05/24/2003 6:25:46 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: TLBSHOW
Just like the "ENRON" trap the dems thought they were setting for Bush, this one will spring and catch Clinton in its jaws instead. More and more information regarding how Clinton not only missed chances to capture and or kill Bin Laden and his cohorts is coming out, but clear evidence that Clinton refused to cooperate in investigations, surprised evidence, and even punished FBI investigators who were within striking distance of the perps. Ben Veniste will someday realize that he has lashed himself to a sinking ship, but apparently he is not smart enough to have figured it out just yet.
To: TLBSHOW
WHY aren't they going back to the mid-90's?????? Why aren't they grilling the stooges that were the clintoons??? Why aren't they asking some tough questions to them? How 'bout clintoon himself?? Oh, I forgot, he never tells the truth under oath!
To: TLBSHOW
OK - What needs to happen is Conservatives need to turn the questioning back around at THEM. Ask THEM what Clinton FAILED to do after the 1993 WTC attack! Ask THEM what Clinton FAILED to do after the Khobar Towers bombing. Ask THEM what clinton FAILED to do after the USS COle attack.
This NEEDS to be turned around and NOW!
13
posted on
05/24/2003 6:33:57 PM PDT
by
peteram
To: TLBSHOW
"Given the awareness of the terrorist use of planes as weapons, how was it that NORAD was ... not better prepared to protect against the hijacking of commercial jets?"
Given that President George W. Bush was in office 7 1/2 months at the time of the attack, and that most of the 2nd and 3rd tier officials were not yet confirmed, Ben-Veniste should address his question to the appropriate Clinton Administration hacks.
As for some victims' family members looking to pin something on President Bush, why is that surprising? The New York metro area is very heavily Democrat in political persuasion. It is not at all surprising that at least some family members would look to make partisan political hay out of the atrocity. For some, it would be a twofer: grinding their particular political axe, and salivating over the possibility that they could sue the government for mega-millions.
14
posted on
05/24/2003 6:35:21 PM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(If we don't re-elect this truly great President, we're NUTS!)
To: Richard Axtell
That should have been "supressed evidence" wouldn't you say Richard? Surprise is what is in store for Mr. Ben Veniste, when he gets too deep into this, and realizes that he has just nailed his own bosses's hide to the wall.
To: TLBSHOW
The Dems don't REALLY want public hearings on the WTC Attacks. But they will grumble and try to make it white noise in the background in 2004.
16
posted on
05/24/2003 6:37:10 PM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(When news breaks, we fix it!)
To: harpu
Ewwww-gross me out. Gorelick pulling 'Ol Crusty down around the Beast's hind hoofs. I'm gonna' gag.
17
posted on
05/24/2003 6:39:28 PM PDT
by
putupon
(nothing more to read here, move along)
To: TLBSHOW
Clinton cutting back our air defense alert strips from 26 to 7 was a major factor!!!! One of those strip alerts cut back from duty prior to that infamous day, happening under Clinton, was Atlantic City, N.J. only minutes away from N.Y.. President Bush after 09/11/01 reinstated alert at those 26 sites.
18
posted on
05/24/2003 6:40:27 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Lunatic Fringe
LOOKS LIKE THE DEM-WITS AND THE KLINTOONS WILL GET BIT IN THE BUTT AGAIN!!!!
19
posted on
05/24/2003 6:43:21 PM PDT
by
jocko12
To: Howlin
Wow, both Klayman and Limbacher are all in a tether tonight, about the clintons!! Surprise, surprise, if the clintons can't get bad publicity, they just can't get any at all!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson