Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mr. Horowitz Owes Christians an Apology; Latest conservative to go pro-'gay'
Culture and Family Institute ^ | 5/21/2003 | Robert H. Knight

Posted on 05/21/2003 2:40:44 PM PDT by Polycarp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last
To: Polycarp
This why some of us throw up our hands and get fed up with the Conservatives who say their dictates, their version of Bible interpretation and their reading of the law must be followed 110% or they will stay home on election day and give half a vote to the Dem-Lib.

Think about this. Most of the gay vote in Florida probably went to Gore, but 10 to 15% undoubtably went to Bush. Without those votes, Gore would have won Florida and the Presidency. Is that what you want?

The day ANY Conservative thinks where some guy in Ardvark, Oklahoma puts his Johnson at night is more important than who the President is probably couldn't find his way to the polls anyway!

PS, I would remind you of the words of The Rev. J.C. Watts re: homosexuality, "Hate the sin, love the sinner!"

PPS. I'm straight as a Laser beam, 2 tours in RVN, and know we need every vote we can get.
21 posted on 05/21/2003 3:17:22 PM PDT by MindBender26 (For more news as it happens, stay tuned to your local FReeper station.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
John 1:1 & 14
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. And the Word was MADE FLESH, and DWELT AMONG
US.
God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost have always existed..
Jesus the Son of God is God... Jesus said: "if you have seen me you have seen the Father"

.."I and the father are one" he also testified about Himself...

Everything that was created ..was created by him

The Word of God is also recorded in the bible the New Testament and the Old Testament

Jesus didnt need to say anything about sodomy in the new testament...he was quite expressive in how He and God the Father and the Holy Spirit felt about it

Perhaps you remember Sodom & Gomorrah..they werent destroyed for lack of Log Cabin Republicans...

the Atheists and those who do not believe that Jesus is God or the Son of the living God
believe that he only existed as a man...and only existed after he was born of woman..

He is God and was born of woman..He is eternal having always existed...

Everything writen by men throughout the total of human history inspired (breathed into)by God came from the Lord Jesus Christ..

He made his words on the subject of sodomy quite direct...

Horowitz is a non believer...and so looks to make a point against Christians based upon his unbelief..
This has been done many times in the past...and will continue until He returns...

There are only two kinds of humans on this planet... the saved and the unsaved (God already knows who will be saved so they are included in the saved for their salvation is as good as done for the work of their salvation is complete in Christ)

Sodomy was the lifestyle of choice in Sodom and so among the sodomites appeared to be quite normal...they converted all poor souls who had the misfortune of crossing their paths..they tried to "convert" two of God's messangers and met with His power...much to the sodomites chagrin

Sodomy will never ever be acceptable to God or God's people..although for a time it may be acceptable to a culture ..God will not be mocked..and He will not stay his hand forever...any culture who mainstreams this will in the end meet the same or worse fate of Sodom..
imo
22 posted on 05/21/2003 3:18:08 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

PS, I would remind you of the words of The Rev. J.C. Watts re: homosexuality, "Hate the sin, love the sinner!"

Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 US 186 (1986) The Constitution does not confer a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy.

BURGER, C.J., Concurring Opinion Decisions of individuals relating to homosexual conduct have been subject to state intervention throughout the history of Western civilization. Condemnation of those practices is firmly rooted in Judeo-Christian moral and ethical standards. Homosexual sodomy was a capital crime under Roman law.... During the English Reformation, when powers of the ecclesiastical courts were transferred to the King's Courts, the first English statute criminalizing sodomy was passed.... Blackstone described "the infamous crime against nature" as an offense of "deeper malignity" than rape, a heinous act "the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature," and "a crime not fit to be named." W. Blackstone, Commentaries . The common law of England, including its prohibition of sodomy, became the received law of Georgia and the other Colonies. In 1816, the Georgia Legislature passed the statute at issue here, and that statute has been continuously in force in one form or another since that time. To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.

Thomas Jefferson on Sodomy Sect. XIV. Whosoever shall be guilty of rape, polygamy, or sodomy* with a man or woman, shall be punished; if a man, by castration, a woman, by boring through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch in diameter at the least. Peterson, Merrill D. "Crimes and Punishments" Thomas Jefferson: Writings Public Papers (Literary Classics of the United States, Inc. 1984) pp. 355, 356.

Hundreds rally for '10 Commandments judge' Moore wrote a separate concurring opinion, repudiating homosexuality on religious grounds, calling it "abhorrent, immoral, detestable, a crime against nature, and a violation of the laws of nature and of nature's God."

23 posted on 05/21/2003 3:20:59 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
"Mr. Horowitz’s agenda here seems to be to accuse Christian conservatives of bigotry, pure and simple"

Heard Horowitz give a speech once. Something about him made me distrust this man. Don't know what it was. Didn't care that he was once a RAT rabble rouser and now a proclaimed conservative Repub. Just didn't trust him. Still don't.
24 posted on 05/21/2003 3:22:03 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
I see your post and I can't see in there if you agree that gays should be thrown in jail or fined. Since you believe that these people are going to go to Hell, what should be done with them on earth?
25 posted on 05/21/2003 3:26:46 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
No he doesn't I appreciate people like Cal Thomas and John MacArthur that had the guts to challenge the christian coalition types in the church. Have a nice day!!
26 posted on 05/21/2003 3:31:59 PM PDT by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
...and yoo think that's reason to elect Gore President?
27 posted on 05/21/2003 3:32:19 PM PDT by MindBender26 (For more news as it happens, stay tuned to your local FReeper station.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lelio

OPTION A:

The Summer of Our Discontent: The Church Fights Back in the Culture War on Homosexuality." <> Transforming Congregations is a network of uniting ("mainline") churches in the USA and Australia whose mission is to "provide information, resources and training in understanding and involvement in transforming ministry toward homosexuals, and to encourage transforming ministry based on loving compassion, scripture, and The Discipline of the United Methodist Church." Courage is a network of Roman Catholics whose mission is to "provide spiritual support for men and women striving to live chaste lives in accordance with the Catholic Church's pastoral teaching on homosexuality." Write to Courage, c/oChurch of St John the Baptist, 210 W 31st Street, New York, NY 10001. The phone number is (212) 268-1010. There are chapters in many major cities, including New York, Philadelphia, Harrisburg, and Chicago. One By One is a fellowship of Presbyterian (USA) churches whose mission is to "educate and equip the Church to minister the transforming grace and power of the Lord Jesus Christ to those who are in conflict with their sexuality." PFOX - welcome! No one is born gay. All scientific studies, including those by gay scientists, have not found any gay gene or gay brain center.


SODOMY : Homosexual Rape and Murder of Children

SODOMY : Log Cabin leader tied to Website urged murder of President Reagan, Christian leaders

SODOMY : Major Scientific Study Examines Domestic Violence Among Gay Men

SODOMY : Sex Abuse And Homosexuals

SODOMY : The Lords of Bakersfield (Powerful gay men. Vulnerable teen-age boys. Murder.)


OPTION B:

 

State Sodomy Laws in 1791

Connecticut

That if any man shall lie with mankind, as he lieth with womankind, both of them have committed abomination, they both shall be put to death; except it shall appear that one of the parties was forced, or under fifteen years of age; in which case the party forced, or under the age aforesaid, shall not be liable to suffer the said punishment. THE PUBLIC STATUTE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, 1808 title LXVI (66), ch. 1, § 2, p. 295.

Delaware

That if any person or persons shall commit sodomy, or buggery, or rape or robbery, . . . he or they so offending, or committing any of the said crimes within this government, their counsellors, aiders, comforters and abettors, being convicted thereof, as above-said, shall suffer as felons, according to the tenor, direction, form and effect of the several statutes in such cases respectively made and provided in Great Britain; any act or law of this government to the contrary in any wise not withstanding. LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, 1797, ch. 22a, § 5, p. 67 (passed in 1719).

Maryland

Maryland had no sodomy statute in 1791, but the Declaration of Rights of Maryland, section 3, a portion of the Maryland State Constitution passed in 1776 said "that the inhabitants of Maryland are entitled to the common law of England. . . ." Sodomy was a crime under the common law (see section on North Carolina). Every person duly convicted of the crime of sodomy, shall be sentenced to undergo a similar confinement for a period not less than one year nor more than ten years, under the same conditions as are herein after directed. MARYLAND LAWS, ch. . CXXXVIII (138), art. IV, § 8.

Massachusetts

That if any man shall lay with mankind as he layeth with a woman, or any man or woman shall have carnal copulation with any beast or brute creature, and be thereof duly convicted, the offender, in either of those cases, shall be adjudged guilty of felony, shall be sentenced to suffer the pains of death, and the beast shall be slain, and every part thereof burned. And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that such order and form of process shall be had and used, in trial of such offenders, and such judgment given, and execution done, upon the offender, as in cases of murder. PERPETUAL LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, 1780- 1789, p. 187, Act of March 3, 1785.

New Hampshire

That if any man shall carnally lie with a man, as a man carnally lieth with a woman, or if any man or woman shall have carnal copulation with any beast, or brute creature, and be thereof convicted, the offender in either of those cases before mentioned, shall suffer death, and the beast shall be slain and burned. LAWS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, 1805, p. 267 (passed February 8, 1791).

New Jersey

That sodomy, or the infamous crime against nature, committed with mankind or beast, shall be adjudged a high crime and misdemeanor, and be punished by fine and solitary imprisonment at hard labour, for any term not exceeding twenty-one years. ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, March 18, 1796, ch. DC, § 7, p. 93.

New York

That the detestable and abominable vice of buggery, committed with mankind, or beast, shall be from henceforth adjudged felony; and such order and form of process therein shall be used against the offenders, as in cases of felony at the common law; and that every person being thereof convicted, by verdict, confession, or outlawry, shall be hanged by the neck, until he or she shall be dead. LAWS OF NEW YORK, ch. . 21, p. 391 (passed February 14, 1787).

North Carolina

When the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791, North Carolina had adopted the English common law statute of Henry VIII which was the basis for the common law's crime of buggery (see section on South Carolina): Forasmuch as there is not yet sufficient and condign punishment appointed and limited by the due course of the Laws of this Realm, for the detestable and abominable vice of Buggery committed with mankind or beast: It may therefore please the King's Highness, with the assent of his Lords spiritual and temporal, and the Commons of this present Parliament assembled . . . That the same offense be from henceforth adjudged Felony . . . And that the offenders being hereof convict . . . shall suffer such pains of death and losses and penalties of their goods, chattels, debts, lands, tenements and hereditaments, as Felons be accustomed to doe [sic] according to the order of the Common-laws of this Realm. And that no person offending in any such offense, shall be admitted to his Clergy, And that Justices of Peace shall have power and authority, within the limits of their Commissions and Jurisdictions, to hear and determine the said offense, as they do use to doe [sic] in cases of other Felonies . . . 25 Henry VIII, ch. 6.

Pennsylvania

That the pains and penalties hereinafter mentioned shall be inflicted upon the several offenders who shall from and after the passing of this act commit and be legally convicted of any of the offences hereinafter enumerated and specified, in lieu of the pains and penalties which by law have been heretofore inflicted; that is to say, every person convicted of robbery, burglary, sodomy or buggery or as accessory thereto before the fact shall forfeit to the commonwealth all and singular the lands and tenements, goods and chattels whereof he or she was seized or possessed at the time the crime was committed and at any time afterwards until conviction and be sentenced to undergo a servitude of any term or time at the discretion of the court passing the sentence not exceeding ten years in the public gaol or house of correction of the county or city in which the offence shall have been committed and be kept at such labor and fed and clothed in such manner as is herein after directed. THE STATUTES AT LARGE OF PENNSYLVANIA, 1682-1801, vol. 13, (1682- 1801), p. 511, ch. MDXVI (1516).

Rhode Island

That every person who shall be convicted of sodomy, or of being accessary [sic] thereto before the fact, shall, for the first offence [sic], be carried to the gallows in a cart, and set upon said gallows, for a space of time not exceeding four hours, and thence to the common gaol, there to be confined for a term not exceeding three years, and shall be grieviously fined at the direction of the Court; and for the second offence [sic] shall suffer death. THE PUBLIC LAWS OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS , 1798, § 8, p. 586, "An Act to Reform the Penal Laws."

South Carolina

Forasmuch as there is not yet sufficient and condign [sic] Punishment appointed and limited by the due Course of the A-6 Laws of this Realm, for the detestable and abominable Vice of Buggery committed with the Mankind or Beast: (2) It may therefore be enacted, That the same offence be from henceforth adjudged felony, and such Order and Form of Process therein to be used against the Offenders as in Cases of Felony at the Common Law; (3) and that the Offenders being hereof convict [sic] by Verdict, Confession, or Outlawry, shall suffer such Pains of Death, and Losses and Penalties of the Goods, Chattels, Debts, Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments, as Felons be accustomed to do, according to the Order of the Common Laws of this Realm; (4) and that no Person offending in any such Offence, shall be admitted to his Clergy; (5) and that Justices of Peace shall have Power and Authority, within the Limits of their Commissions and Jurisdictions, to hear and determine the said Offence, as they do use to do in Case of other Felonies. PUBLIC LAWS OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1790, p. 49.

The English common law statute banning sodomy issued by Henry VIII reads:

Where in the Parliament begun at London the 3d Day of November in the 21st Years of the late King of most famous Memory, King Henry the Eighth, and after by Prorogation holden at Westminster in the 25th Year of the Reign of said late King, there was one Act and Statute made, entitled, An Act for the Punishment of the Vice of Buggery, whereby the said detestable Vice was made Felony, as in the said Estatute [sic] more and large it doth and may appear: (2) Forasmuch as the said Statute concerning the Punishment of the said Crime and Offence of Buggery standeth at this present repealed and void by Virtue of the Statute of Repeal made in the 1st Year of the Reign of the late Queen Mary: Sithence which Repeal so had A-7 and made divers evil disposed Persons have been the more bold to commit the said most horrible and detestable Vice of Buggery aforesaid, to the high Displeasure of Almighty God. II. Be it enacted, That the said Statute before mentioned, made in the 25th Year of the said late King Henry the 8th, for the Punishment of the said detestable Vice of Buggery, and every Branch, Clause, Article and Sentence therein contained, shall from and after the 1st Day of June next coming be revived, and from thenceforce shall stand, remain, and be in full Force, Strength and Effect for every, in such Manner, Form and Condition, as the same Statue was at the Day of the Death of the said late King Henry the Eighth, the said Statute of Repeal made in the said 1st Year of the said late Queen Mary or any Words general or special therein contained, or any other Act or Acts, Thing or Things, to the contrary notwithstanding.

PUBLIC LAWS OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1790, p. 65.

Virginia

Before 1792, Virginia relied on the English common law which made sodomy a punishable crime (see HENNINGS STATUTES OF VIRGINIA, vol. 9, 1775-1778, ch. V, § VI, p. 127). Virginia passed a specific sodomy ban in 1792:

That if any do commit the detestable and abominable vice of buggery, with man or beast, he or she so offending, shall be adjudged a felon, and shall suffer death, as in case of felony, without the benefit of clergy. VIRGINIA STATUTES AT LARGE, 1835, p. 113 .

State Sodomy Laws in 1868

Alabama

Crimes against nature, either with mankind or any beast, are punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary not less than two or more than ten years. ALABAMA CODE, 1852, § 3235, p. 583 .

Arkansas

Every person convicted of sodomy, or buggery, shall be imprisoned in said jail and penitentiary house, for a period not less than five, nor more than 21 years. STATUTES OF ARKANSAS, 1858, ch. 51, Art. IV, § 5, p. 335 (passed in 1838).

California

The infamous crime against nature, either with man or beast, shall subject the offender to be punished by imprisonment in the State Prison for a term not less than five years, and which may extend to life. STATUTES 1850 , ch. 99, § 48, p. 99.

Florida

Whoever commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature, either with mankind or with any beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the State penitentiary not exceeding twenty years. FLORIDA LAWS 1868, ch. 1637, Subchap. 8, § 17, p. 98.

Georgia

Sodomy and bestiality shall be punished by hard labour in the penitentiary, during the natural life or lives of person or persons convicted of these detestable crimes. LAMAR'S OF GEORGIA, 1810-1819, § 35, p. 571.

Illinois

The infamous crime against nature, either with man or beast, shall subject the offender to be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term not less than one year, and may extend to life. REVISED STATUTES OF 1844-45, ch. 30, Div. 5, § 50, p. 158.

Kansas

Every person who shall be convicted of the detestable and abominable crime against nature, committed with mankind or with beast, shall be punished by confinement and hard labor not exceeding ten years. Art. 7, ch. 31, § 249, GENERAL STATUTES of 1868 (found at vol. 2, p. 340, STATUTES OF KANSAS , 1897).

Kentucky

Whoever shall be convicted of the crime of sodomy or buggery with man or beast, he shall be confined in the penitentiary not less than two nor more than five years. REVISED STATUTES OF 1852, ch. 28, Art. IV, § 11, p. 381.

Louisiana

Whoever shall be convicted of the detestable and abominable crime against nature, committed with mankind or beast, shall suffer imprisonment at hard labor for life. REVISED STATUTES OF LOUISIANA, 1856, "CRIMES AND OFFENCES," § 5, p. 136.

Maine

Whoever commits the crime against nature, with mankind or with a beast, shall be punished by imprisonment not less than one, nor more than ten years. REVISED STATUTES OF 1857, ch. 124, § 3, p. 684.

Michigan

Every person who shall commit the abominable and detestable crime against nature, either with mankind or with any beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the State prison not more than fifteen years. COMPILED LAWS OF 1857 , § 5871, p. 1543.

Minnesota

Every person who shall commit sodomy, or the crime against nature, either with mankind or any beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the territorial [sic] prison, not more than five years, nor less than one year. MINNESOTA STATUTES 1858, ch. 96, § 13, p. 729.

Mississippi

Every person who shall be convicted of the detestable and abominable crime against nature, committed with mankind or with a beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term not more than ten years. LAWS OF 1857, ch. 64, Art. 238, § 52, p. 611.

Missouri

Every person who shall be convicted of the detestable and abominable crime against nature, committed with mankind or with beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary not less than ten years. REVISED STATUTES 1855, ch. 50, § 7, p. 624.

Nevada

The infamous crime against nature, either with man or beast, shall subject the offender to be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a term not less than five years and which may extend to life.

A-12 THE COMPILED LAWS OF NEVADA IN FORCE FROM 1861-1900, § 4699, sec. 45, p. 915 (approved November 26, 1861).

Oregon

If any person shall commit sodomy or the crime against nature either with mankind or beast, such person, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary not less than one year, nor more than five years. OREGON ORGANIC AND GENERAL LAWS , 1845-64 , ch. 48, § 639, p. 560 (passed October 19, 1864).

Tennessee

Crimes against nature, either with mankind or any beast, are punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary not less than five nor more than fifteen years. CODE OF TENNESSEE, 1858, § 4843, p. 868.

Texas

If any person shall commit with mankind or beast the abominable and detestable crime against nature, he shall be deemed guilty of sodomy, and on conviction thereof, he shall be punished by confinement in the penitentiary for not less than five nor more than fifteen years. PENAL CODE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, 1879, art. 342, p. 46 (passed on February 11, 1860).

Vermont

Vermont had no criminal sodomy statute until 1937, although Vermont courts recognized sodomy as a crime at common law, which could be punished. See STATE v. LA FORREST , 71 Vt. 311, 45 A. 225 (1899). This is the text of the Vermont criminal sodomy statute passed in 1937: A person participating in the act of copulating the mouth of one person with the sexual organ of another shall be imprisoned in the state prison not less than one year nor more than five years. VERMONT STATUTES OF 1947, ch. 370, § 8480, p. 1593 .

West Virginia

If any person shall commit the crime of buggery, either with mankind or with any brute animal, he shall be confined in the penitentiary not less than one nor more than five years. CODE OF WEST VIRGINIA- 1870, ch. 149, § 12, p. 694 (passed in 1868).

Wisconsin

Every person who shall commit sodomy, or the crime against nature, either with mankind or beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, not more than five years nor less than one year. REVISED STATUTES OF WISCONSIN, 1858, ch. 170, § 15, p. 975.

A-14 After 1868 Indiana Indiana did not have a criminal sodomy law at the time of the passage of the 14 th Amendment, but passed the following law in 1881: Whoever commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature, by having carnal knowledge of a man or beast, or who, being a male, carnally knows any man or any woman through the anus, and whoever entices, allures, instigates, or aids any person under the age of twenty-one years to commit masturbation or self-pollution--is guilty of sodomy, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in the State prison not more than fourteen years nor less than two years. REVISED STATUTES OF INDIANA- 1897, ch. 5, art. 5, § 2118, p. 338.

Iowa

Iowa did not have a criminal sodomy law at the time of passage of the 14 th Amendment, but later passed the following law in 1892: Any person who shall commit sodomy, shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary not more than ten years nor less than one year. ANNOTATED CODE OF IOWA, 1897, § 4937, p. 1941, passed 24 General Assembly, ch. 39.

Ohio

Ohio did not have a criminal sodomy law in 1868, at the time of ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Ohio Legislature later passed a criminal sodomy statute in 1885: Sec. 1 That whoever shall have carnal copulation against nature, with another human being or with a beast, shall be deemed guilty of sodomy, and shall, on conviction thereof, be imprisoned in the penitentiary not more than twenty years. OHIO LAWS 1885, p. 241 (passed May 4, 1885).

Nebraska

Nebraska had a criminal sodomy law while it was a territory, but not for a few years after it became a state. The Statutes of the Nebraska Territory of 1866 had a criminal sodomy statute at § 47, "Offenses Against Persons," p. 599. Nebraska had no criminal sodomy law at the time the states ratified the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868. The Nebraska State Legislature later passed such a law in 1875, using the exact language of the earlier territorial sodomy law. That infamous crime against nature either with man or beast, shall subject the offender to be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term not less than one year, and my [sic] extend to life. COMPILED STATUTES, 1881, § 245, p. 805.

28 posted on 05/21/2003 3:32:43 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
The answer to the "choice" question, I think, should be put like this: one can choose from moment to moment the kind of spirit he receives in his heart. And over time, these momentary choices firm up into a walk. It's not quick, easy, or glamorous, nor does it guarantee there won't be moments (hours, days, weeks, even years) that one will make the wrong choice.

The clincher for one's identity, however, is the eternal position given to one by Jesus Christ at the moment of entering into salvation. Seated with Him at the right hand of God the father. Without this, one is literally lost.

Programs which center one's identity on feelings or on personal works have it screwed up.
29 posted on 05/21/2003 3:33:52 PM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lelio
What does the author mean by "gay rights"? Does that involve the right not to be thrown in jail or fined for being gay?

According to gay groups, gay rights include, but are not limited to, immunity from prosecution for being gay (i.e. sodomy), not being discriminated in relation to a job or volunteer work, the right to be married, to adopt children, to be role models for children, to associated or engage in any activity that a straight heterosexual would be able to, and the right for people to respect, and honor there lifestyle, to be free from judgement from others, to be free to engage in P.D.A. without being harassed,etc.

30 posted on 05/21/2003 3:38:42 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Let'um all talk all the while this administration spends your hard-earned dollars for Teddy "the swimmer" Kennedy's pet causes to the tune of 11 BILLION. But don't let Tancredo go to the White House. Horowitz had his fling. And if GW thinks just because he stood up to the obvious of 9-11 that he will win my vote by doing the "triangulation crapola" with the rest of the process of Washington - not with this person. I hold that Rove guy the problem, not GW but it all comes out in the end. No "true" conservative agenda passed.
31 posted on 05/21/2003 3:42:29 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I voted for Bush.

Gore is not running and I will not vote for any Democrat. I wouldn't vote for Gore, if he became a REPUBLICAN.

The links in post #16, go into detail about Government and Sodomy.

Finally:

Compassionate Society Should Discourage Deadly Homosexual Behavior

Homosexual behavior increases risk of AIDS - Dr. Brian J. Kopp, ... An exhaustive study in The New England Journal of Medicine, medical literature's only study reporting on homosexuals who kept sexual "diaries," indicated the average homosexual ingests the fecal material of 23 different men each year.

Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do FECAL SEX About 80% of gays (see Table) admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk. In the diary study,5 70% of the gays had engaged in this activity--half regularly over 6 months. Result? --the "annual incidence of hepatitis A in...homosexual men was 22 percent, whereas no heterosexual men acquired hepatitis A." In 1992,26 it was noted that the proportion of London gays engaging in oral/anal sex had not declined since 1984.

SODOMY : Bug Chasers:The men who long to be HIV+

Citizens Against Government Waste Since the first federal resources were made available to state and local health agencies for AIDS prevention in 1985, federal funding, which now includes money for research, treatment, and housing, has skyrocketed to $13 billion for fiscal 2003. As a result of the work of highly mobilized lobbying forces, more is spent per patient on AIDS than on any other disease, though it does not even currently rank among the top 15 causes of death in the United States. In one year, 1998, heart disease, the nation's leading cause of death, killed 724,859 Americans only 6.8 percent less than the 774,767 who have contracted AIDS in the last 20 years.2 Of those 774,767 total AIDS cases, 462,766 have died. During that same period, 14 million Americans 30 times more have died of heart disease.

 

32 posted on 05/21/2003 3:44:48 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: boothead; Polycarp
'Jesus did not mention homosexuality specifically in the four Gospels.'

You might say the same thing about slavery.

But Mohammed did specifically mention support of slavery.

33 posted on 05/21/2003 3:47:17 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lelio
I see your post and I can't see in there if you agree that gays should be thrown in jail or fined.

My opinion: Persons found guilty of crimes against nature (sodomy, etc.) should be subject to the same sort of punishments that bigamists, necrophiliacs, and other sexual perverts receive when sentenced. I'd personally suggest a return to public flogging or the stocks for sexual criminals, but fines and/or imprisonment would suffice.

Since you believe that these people are going to go to Hell, what should be done with them on earth?

Being afflicted with a disordered carnal desire for persons of one's own sex is not in and of itself a mortal sin. Voluntarily engaging in the practice of disordered sexual acts is. One can be afflicted with homosexual desires and be a good Christian at the same time provided that one chooses not to give in to their disordered desire for same-sex relations. In other words, homosexuals who remain chaste for life can be saved by the Grace of Christ; those who shamelessly practice unnatural sexual relations are disobeying Our Lord and will receive the consequences of their disobedience. (The same goes for people who choose to engage in sinful acts of any sort.)

Being a homosexual is like being an alcoholic. In both cases, the afflicted person suffers from a disorder of a good and natural physical desire: the alcoholic, from a disordered desire to drink liquor, the homosexual from a disordered desire to have sexual relations with persons of their same sex. Just as a recovering alcoholic can go to Heaven through faith in Christ, so can the homosexual who recognizes the sinfulness of the homosexual "lifestyle" and renounces it for good. A good Christian can no more say "God hates fags" than he can say "God hates drunks"; in each case, the responsibility of the Christian is to confront the afflicted person with evidence of their sin, then to compassionately help them as they struggle with their unnatural desires.

34 posted on 05/21/2003 3:47:47 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Heard Horowitz give a speech once. Something about him made me distrust this man.

I heard him do an hour with G. Gordon Liddy and got the same vibe. I don't like/trust him.
35 posted on 05/21/2003 3:54:33 PM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
And as other posters have pointed out, his endorsement of sodomy is not offensive only to fundamentalist Christians, but also to devout Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christians, Orthodox Jews, Mormons, etc.

I missed the part where Horowitz endorses sodomy. Could you point it out for me?

36 posted on 05/21/2003 3:57:16 PM PDT by Urbane_Guerilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
An interesting summary of sodomy laws, though it ends a bit far in the past. Now, a few questions:

1) Are you in support of criminalizing sodomy for heterosexuals as well as homosexuals? Some of the laws you cite made no such distinction. That would make oral sex between man and wife illegal, of course.

2) Many of the laws you cite make bestiality illegal. I note that, in present day Texas, bestiality - in private - carries no criminal charges. Do you approve of this?

3) If you approve, why? Does not your holy scripture say that "whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death"? (Exodus 22:19) As I understand it, we mortals are not allowed to pick and choose which parts of scripture to follow and which to ignore.

4) If you do not approve, then why have we seen no outrage on your part, or on the part of anyone else here, DEMANDING that this serious affront to god's holy word be ended? (This has been law in Texas since 1994, and there are innocent animals being victimized here.)
37 posted on 05/21/2003 4:03:51 PM PDT by jde1953
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Perhaps the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) should change its name to the Human Rights Coalition for Men and Boys.

Oh, man!

For God's sake, don't give those sick perverts any ideas!

38 posted on 05/21/2003 4:08:29 PM PDT by Houmatt (Ouija boards!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan; Remedy
Thanks for posting. You state what you think a good Christian should do:
in each case, the responsibility of the Christian is to confront the afflicted person with evidence of their sin, then to compassionately help them as they struggle with their unnatural desires.
But then you state what you would do:
My opinion: Persons found guilty of crimes against nature (sodomy, etc.) should be subject to the same sort of punishments that bigamists, necrophiliacs, and other sexual perverts receive when sentenced. I'd personally suggest a return to public flogging or the stocks for sexual criminals, but fines and/or imprisonment would suffice.
How does comparing a man that loves another man to one that has sex with a corpse he just dug up show any compassion?

I've yet to hear from Rev Fred Phelps Remedy on what he would do with gays. Probably flog them with cut-n-paste posts.
39 posted on 05/21/2003 4:09:00 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
A good Christian can no more say "God hates fags" than he can say "God hates drunks"

You do realize that you've forced yourself to advocate public flogging for making either of those statements....

40 posted on 05/21/2003 4:11:27 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson