Skip to comments.
The fog at Foggy Bottom (State Dept employees contempt for Bush)
Washington Times ^
| 5/21/03
| Op Ed
Posted on 05/21/2003 1:36:38 AM PDT by Mark Felton
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:03:21 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: Mark Felton
The State Department has been infested with self-serving cockroaches for years. It needs a thorough fumigation.
41
posted on
05/26/2003 1:36:29 PM PDT
by
Gritty
To: DPB101
Termination of unjust collective bargaining "rights" of civil servants is a good step. Next should be the removal of collective bargaining rights from the private sector. He should not stop with the bureaucracy. All federal agencies should also be subject to these steps of privitization and removal of collective rights.
42
posted on
05/26/2003 1:37:13 PM PDT
by
eBelasco
To: eBelasco
With trial lawyers coming down people's chimneys to beg them to sue their employer for anything or nothing, unions serve no purpose today. Except for government unions. They lobby government for more government. Trials lawyers are not as efficient in that.
43
posted on
05/26/2003 1:48:58 PM PDT
by
DPB101
("5,000 Americans die every year because of pathogens in meat"--Charles Schumer)
To: DPB101
Exactly. Government unions, staffed by gov't workers, lobby other gov;t workers. It's a racket.
44
posted on
05/26/2003 1:52:03 PM PDT
by
eBelasco
To: Mark Felton
...there are few Bush loyalists at Foggy Bottom. Karl Rove has the power to change that, although it won't be easy fighting entrenched State Department interests.....Mr. Rove must act quickly.The Washington Times has done some legwork here. Clearly, the State Department is still infested with cowardly, socialist Clinton mice.
What are you waiting for, Karl?
To: Mark Felton
I've said it before, but I believe that one of the greatest threats to the security of the United States of America is the US State Department. I believe that the culture of socialism and one world government has been nurtured there since the FDR administration.
I keep hearing about "career diplomats" who are "apolitical." I disagree strongly with that. The thought that there are people working on behalf on the USA who do not have the welfare and independence of the USA first and foremost in their minds is a national tradgedy!
Mark
46
posted on
05/26/2003 2:49:20 PM PDT
by
MarkL
(Maybe that was a bit TOO inflamatory? Nahhhh....)
To: Mark Felton
The difference between the Defense Department and the State Department is, Rumsfeld had done a pretty good job of pruning out the deadwood, while Powell has a rather nastier thicket of thorns to go through.
Not Powell's shortcoming, just a much bigger job. The culture at State has been little changed since the days of the New Deal. But a few fracture lines are starting to appear, as some of the more important desks change bit by bit, and the old guard is more and more isolated.
To: Mark Felton
Consider an example with deep policy ramifications. On March 31, representatives of the North Korean government told State Department officials, for the first time, that they were reprocessing plutonium, a key step in developing nuclear weapons. The Pentagon and the White House did not learn of this stunning announcement until Pyongyang told them during previously scheduled talks with North Korea in China on April 18. The State Department intentionally withheld this vital piece of information, fearing that, if the White House knew, officials there might call off the meeting. The White House was reportedly furious about this deception, but it has done nothing concrete to make sure it doesn't happen again. A White House official laments, "We always get really worked up, but then we don't do anything." This Op-Ed piece is based on this one story as told by an unnamed White House official.
If this story is true, and I'm not sure that it is, then the title of the Op-Ed piece should be, "Fog in the Oval Office".
48
posted on
05/26/2003 4:48:46 PM PDT
by
FreeReign
(V5.0 Enterprise Edition)
To: fporretto
To: sarcasm
Do you want a political litmus test for government employment?
Yes, when they are working for the President and not against him. They should implement his directives not x42's.
50
posted on
05/26/2003 6:37:35 PM PDT
by
zip
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson