Pride Before The Fall (Horowitz Sticks it to the Fundies!)

FrontPage Magazine ^ | 5/20/03 | David Horowitz

[breakem]

Thanx for the info.

[breakem]

Hope you don't grade for spelling. LOL!

[breakem]

Can you think of a reason why 645 was deleted?

[breakem]

It should still be on your comments list

[Admin Moderator]

645 restored. My mistake. Sorry about that.

[breakem]

Thanx, I try to stay within 1.5 standard deviations for posters. LOL!

[breakem]

of course, I got 666

[jmc813]

E-mail me privately again and the moderators will have a chat with you in the "back room". It is you who is out of control and too irrational to see the fool you have made of yourself. Your private e-mail to me is unwanted. Keep your illness to yourself. Wonder why homos are sooo childish ... could be because they are emotionally immature, like you.

How old are you? I'm guessing about 14 or so.

[scripter]

FYI...Have you seen this?:

Mr. Horowitz Owes Christians an Apology; Latest conservative to go pro-'gay'

[Remedy]

What you call 'pings' could be construed as baiting & stalking.

Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 US 186 (1986) The Constitution does not confer a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy.

BURGER, C.J., Concurring Opinion Decisions of individuals relating to homosexual conduct have been subject to state intervention throughout the history of Western civilization. Condemnation of those practices is firmly rooted in Judeo-Christian moral and ethical standards. Homosexual sodomy was a capital crime under Roman law.... During the English Reformation, when powers of the ecclesiastical courts were transferred to the King's Courts, the first English statute criminalizing sodomy was passed.... Blackstone described "the infamous crime against nature" as an offense of "deeper malignity" than rape, a heinous act "the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature," and "a crime not fit to be named." W. Blackstone, Commentaries . The common law of England, including its prohibition of sodomy, became the received law of Georgia and the other Colonies. In 1816, the Georgia Legislature passed the statute at issue here, and that statute has been continuously in force in one form or another since that time. To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.

Thomas Jefferson on Sodomy Sect. XIV. Whosoever shall be guilty of rape, polygamy, or sodomy* with a man or woman, shall be punished; if a man, by castration, a woman, by boring through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch in diameter at the least. Peterson, Merrill D. "Crimes and Punishments" Thomas Jefferson: Writings Public Papers (Literary Classics of the United States, Inc. 1984) pp. 355, 356.

Hundreds rally for '10 Commandments judge' Moore wrote a separate concurring opinion, repudiating homosexuality on religious grounds, calling it "abhorrent, immoral, detestable, a crime against nature, and a violation of the laws of nature and of nature's God."

[Remedy]

What you call 'pings' could be construed as baiting & stalking.

LOL - Amicus Curiae are stalking and baiting you.

1. SODOMY : Texas Phys.Resource Council, Christian Med. & Dental Association, Catholic Med.Association Sodomy is an efficient method of transmitting STDs. And regardless of the reason, same-sex sodomy is far more effective in spreading STDs than opposite-sex sodomy. Multiple studies have estimated that 40 percent or more of men who practice anal sex acquire STDs. In fact, same-sex sodomy has resulted in the transformation of diseases previously transmitted only through fecally contaminated food and water into sexually caused diseases primarily among those who practice same-sex sodomy.
2. SODOMY : CENTER FOR THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE CONSTITUTION (LAWRENCE v. TEXAS SODOMY BRIEF)
3. SODOMY: Brief Of The States Of Alabama, South Carolina, And Utah (S.C.O.T.U.S.& Sodomy)
4. Lawrence V. Texas, Brief Of The States Of Alabama, South Carolina, And Utah (S.C.O.T.U.S.& Sodomy)

 

[wardaddy]

LOL...well said....I like David but i think his own prejudice is showing a bit.

[breakem]

Thanx, I'm not going there. I can only take so much repititous ignorance.

[Grando Calrissian]

Back then I called them the "moral majorettes". >:)

Is "Churchy L'Femme" still acceptable?

[George W. Bush]

Undoubtedly the poorest excuse for writing that I've ever seen Horowitz produce. This is laughable. He impeaches his central point in the course of two consecutive sentences:

You [Weyrich] told Racicot, "if the perception is out there that the party has accepted the homosexual agenda, the leaders of the pro-family community will be unable to help turn out the pro-family voters. It won’t matter what we say; people will leave in droves."

Howowitz then marches off the end of the world with this response:

This is disingenuous, since you are a community leader and share the attitude you describe. In other words, what you are really saying is that if the mere perception is that the Republican Party has accepted the "homosexual agenda," you will tell your followers to defect with the disastrous consequences that may follow.

Weyrich says he will have no power to convince evangelicals to turn out if the party turns pro-gay. Horowitz then accuses him of saying that Weyrich will encourage his followers to defect.

Since neither Horowitz nor Weyrich have ever been stupid, then someone is lying. Looks to me like it's Horowitz.

In four Gospels - including the Sermon on the Mount - Jesus neglected to mention the subject of homosexuality.

Horowitz demonstrates once again why secular Jews should refrain from trying to lecture Christians on the meaning of New Testament scripture. He doesn't believe in it himself and obviously has very little grasp of it. This is a very careless premise for his article. I've noticed a number of other secular Jews, including political leaders of Israel, commit theology with ridiculous results. They seem to think Judeo-Christian is a meaningful term when both observant Jews and Christians would exclude such thinking out of hand.

[E Rocc]

Back then I called them the "moral majorettes". >:)

Is "Churchy L'Femme" still acceptable?

A particularly good expression to use on Fred Phelps. >:)=

-Eric

[Grando Calrissian]

I would, but I don't want to get 75 linked cut and post articles about sodomy.