Posted on 05/18/2003 9:10:18 PM PDT by Warhorse
Edited on 05/18/2003 9:15:19 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Therefore one would assume that the majority of Freepers would be strong supporters of World Net Daily, which published this article on the Bilderberg group. How is it, then, that so many posters on this thread have tried to make fun of the Bilderberg article -- or just make light of it?
Can it be that these ridiculing posters are concerned that many Freepers also might join in exposing this secretive cabal, to the point where even the Washington Post, NY Times and the boob tube would have to report Bilderberg doings so the great unwashed would know who were making most important public decisions for them?
And if that were done, does anyone think it would have no effect on selection, and election, of presidential and congressional candidates?
I have expressed my opinion, clearly I thought, and anything beyond that exceeds my ambition. Other freepers will have to speak for themselves.
"There's no evidence the President flew to France in a supersonic jet. That's why we must investigate more."
yitbos
Why do you think they've been so secretive about their meetings?...
---------
"There's no evidence the President flew to France in a supersonic jet. That's why we must investigate more."
yitbos
47 posted on 05/20/2003 12:11 AM PDT by bruinbirdman
--------
That's a good illustration of non-answer and deliberate change-subject persiflage and confusion, designed to prevent readers of this thread from giving serious consideration to a very necessary question.
The Bilderberg Conspiracy
yitbos
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.