Skip to comments.
Liberal Smith College Dumps Only Conservative Prof.
http://www.smithsophian.com/news/435249.html ^
Posted on 05/16/2003 3:44:29 PM PDT by dilpo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Out of several hundred faculty members at this super liberal school, even one conservative is one too many.
1
posted on
05/16/2003 3:44:29 PM PDT
by
dilpo
To: dilpo
Because the reappointment letter was positive and because "what has happened since then
is that I basically came out of the closet as a conservative," he suspects
the tenure decision was based on his political beliefs.
Show your true conservative self to a committee of people who probably
worship at the feet of Garafolo, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, Mike Farrell, and
the rest of their cabal?
This guy is too stupid to get tenure anywhere.
(no flames...I'm in academia and have done all I can to disguise the ugly truth...
I'm conservative and culturally a Christian. Heck, I catch enough crap because
of things I can't help, like being white and male.)
2
posted on
05/16/2003 3:49:38 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: dilpo
...this decision will decrease the little political diversity that exists
amongst the faculty at Smith College
Poor deluded children.
Where has anyone in academia promoted POLITICAL diversity?
Well, maybe at places like conservative Hillsdale College where they will
invite speakers from across the political spectrum.
Dennis Prager, conservative Jewish radio show host, spoke at Stanford U.
a few weeks ago.
The next day the college paper did at least quote a student who attended Prager's
lecture as saying that Prager's viewpoints were something you just didn't hear
at Stanford.
3
posted on
05/16/2003 3:53:37 PM PDT
by
VOA
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: walkingman
Ditto. It takes courage to stand up for your beliefs in the face of adversity. Some times you get shot down. This man is a casualty of the culture wars.
6
posted on
05/16/2003 4:07:12 PM PDT
by
dilpo
To: dilpo
Other economics professors argue that the department remains committed to academic freedom. There's a spelling error here. What the 'other economics professors' argued was that the department remains committed to academic fiefdom.
7
posted on
05/16/2003 4:07:35 PM PDT
by
jimkress
To: dilpo
It isn't really the issue. The problem is that the morons in this country continue to PAY LUMP SUMS to these lower-living instutions. That's the real issue. If people would get a freakin' clue and start sending their children to respectable institutions, as hard as they are to find, the problem would solve itself.
Unfortunately, with enough socialism and brain washing, people lose all logic and they don't realize that they are paying for nothing. Take taxes as a perfect example....
To: dilpo
They spared him the hemlock!
9
posted on
05/16/2003 4:10:15 PM PDT
by
cornelis
To: dilpo
"In my 23 years of employment at Smith College, I have witnessed the College at large, and the Department of Economics in particular, go out of its way to protect the academic freedom of all members of the Smith community. In our department, specifically, we have always had an unusually wide range of opinions on both economic methodology and political issues. We have 'agreed to disagree' for as long as I have been here, and we are able to work together because of this mutual respect and tolerance," said Karen A. Pfiefer, professor of economics.LOL! The professor -- who doesn't exactly hide her Marxist tendencies -- sure as hell was singing a different tune when she was originally denied tenure back in 1985 or '86.
I still remember when she just showed up in class and canceled it for the day, so that she could go off and pout somewhere. Yep, it was the afternoon right before a vacation and I missed an early ride home just to stay for that class.
10
posted on
05/16/2003 4:17:49 PM PDT
by
NYC GOP Chick
(Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
To: dilpo
My son went to school just up the street from Smith College. It has a nice campus. The female students all looked like they were having doubts about their gender and were worried about sexual 'self-expression' when I was visiting.
I knew a girl who went to Smith back in the 1960's. She was a cute girl with a conservative family. When she returned from Smith that summer she looked shell shocked. Frankly, she was upset because of the hazing on campus. She was required to sleep with a student from Amherst in order to be admitted to the sorority she was pledging. That experience unnerved her, and changed her dramatically.
In peronal opinion Smith is a garbage dump where Democrats have dumped their pretty and very naive girls for at least the last 50 years. Teaches them to 'grow up' or go lesbian in about two years.
11
posted on
05/16/2003 4:18:27 PM PDT
by
ex-Texan
(primates capitulards toujours en quete de fromage!)
To: ex-Texan
Cute stories, but Smith has never had sororities. Nice try.
12
posted on
05/16/2003 4:19:40 PM PDT
by
NYC GOP Chick
(Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
To: NYC GOP Chick
That was what I was told at the time. Back in 1963. Shoot me for repeating a lie that was told to me way back when. The girl was really shell shocked and upset by the experience. She did not return to Smith but transferred to another college on the left coast.
13
posted on
05/16/2003 4:23:50 PM PDT
by
ex-Texan
(primates capitulards toujours en quete de fromage!)
To: ex-Texan
I'm not shooting you, but I think that whoever told you those stories was full of, well, bullclinton.
For one thing, Smith has never had sororities -- it's an all-women's school and something like 98% of the students live on campus in houses that are far more like typical sorority houses than dorms, complete with living rooms, fireplaces, oriental rugs, dining rooms, etc.
There had to be some other reason that she transferred, but somewhere along the line, someone made up these stories.
14
posted on
05/16/2003 4:28:26 PM PDT
by
NYC GOP Chick
(Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
To: NYC GOP Chick
Are the women assigned to these various houses or do they choose?
To: dilpo
Mr. Miller missed his big opportunity for tenure. What he
should have done is lead a few anti-war demonstrations and call for the impeachment of President Bush for War Crimes.
He would have been a shoo-in and would be drinking champagne (French, of course!) this very night.
16
posted on
05/16/2003 4:39:08 PM PDT
by
Gritty
To: NYC GOP Chick
PS I wouldn't doubt, though, that a form of hazing possibly went on, regardless of the existance of sororities or not.
To: NYC GOP Chick
I do not think so. She was very upset about the whole experience. She was also very bright -- the daughter of a doctor -- not given to imaginative flights of fancy at all.
I chose to believe her story at the time. You will not pursuade me to change my belief in her now, over 35 years after the fact, just because you posted a few words on FR. Bye.
18
posted on
05/16/2003 4:40:20 PM PDT
by
ex-Texan
(primates capitulards toujours en quete de fromage!)
To: dilpo
"If a professor doesn't make it possible for students to raise their views or to disagree with the professor or 'if his ideology so clouded his thinking that he wouldn't bring up counterexamples,' that would be problematic, said Rachel M. Balsham '05. But while Miller 'says a lot of things that are offensive - and I'm not even going to say that taken in context it is perfectly P.C., because it's not - he does so to invite debate, she said. 'I think that brings a lot to the class.'" What on earth could he possibly say that is offensive? That he believes in Laissez-Faire Capitalism and doesn't believe in helping the poor with welfare state programs? And what does she mean "I'm not even going to say that taken in context it is perfectly P.C. because it's not"?
To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Sort of a combination of both. Before starting first year, if you know in advance in which house or on which part of campus you want to live, you can usually request it on the housing form. And, if necessary, you can move during the year. After the first year, you pretty much have free choice in where you want to live, although if too many people want the same house, you might get your second or third choice.
20
posted on
05/16/2003 4:55:14 PM PDT
by
NYC GOP Chick
(Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson