Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comparing satellite & balloon climate data corroborates slower rate of global warming
University of Alabama at Huntsville ^ | May 1, 2003 | Press Release

Posted on 05/15/2003 9:11:40 AM PDT by cogitator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: cogitator; jimkress; The Gunner; jpl; johniegrad; colorado tanker; Reeses; PeaceBeWithYou; ...
Cogitator - Just a damn minute!

How in the hell do you explain this:

Winter in Big Cities of the East Ranked Among the Coldest Since 1950 -

HIGH LATITUDE BLOCKING AND RECORD SNOWCOVER A KEY TO THIS WINTER

Written March 10, 2003
by Joe D'Aleo
Chief WSI/INTELLICAST Meteorologist


In our winter outlook in the fall we showed why the oceans were in a mode, which favored enhanced high latitude blocking, which would make this El Nino colder than the ones we were used to in recent decades.

The degree of high latitude blocking is measured by two climate indices, the North Atlantic and Arctic Oscillations. In recent stories, we showed how the negative mode of both modes favored colder and often snowier than normal conditions in the eastern United States and Europe, even in El Nino winters. The indices were at or near the most negative values observed since 1950 especially during the early winter from October to December.

October to December Arctic Oscillation values were the most negative since 1950. This high latitude blocking helped generate large polar and arctic air masses that helped build deep snowcover and make the winter very cold for many areas in the hemisphere.

This high latitude blocking helped generate extensive polar and arctic air masses that brought extreme cold to places in the Northern Hemisphere. Here in North America, the flow pattern entrained frigid Siberian air to join with the cold high pressure building in Canada. The coldest air was focused on the eastern states.

With the large cold air masses came much more snow than normal across the hemisphere. In fact, according to the data compiled at the CPC, the extent of the Northern Hemisphere's snowcover from October through February was the greatest since records were started in 1973. It even exceeded the deep snowcover of the winters of the late 1970s.

October to February 2002/03 average snowcover for the Northern Hemisphere was at the highest level in the data set eclipsing the previous record set in the winter of 1976/77. From CPC: ftp://ftp.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/cpc/wd52dg/snow/snw_cvr_area/NH_AREA

PERSISTENT COLD WEATHER FROM OCTOBER TO FEBRUARY
El Nino winters are characterized dependably by a ridge in the western parts of North America and a trough in the eastern areas. With the productive Polar Regions and extensive snowcover, temperatures in the trough in the eastern states averaged persistently below normal. Temperatures during the October to February period ranked among the top ten winters since 1950 in many cities in the northeast.

In Boston, it was the second coldest such period just behind 1976/77.

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
Year
Average Temperature
1976/77
35.42
2002/03
35.72

In New York City, the period ranked 4th coldest since 1950 behind the two memorable cold winters in the late 1970s (1976/77 and 1977/78) and the winter of 1967/68.


CENTRAL PARK, NEW YORK
Year
Average Temperature
1976/77
37.55
1967/68
38.25
1977/78
39.35
2002/03
39.70

In Rochester, New York, the winter ranked 7th coldest since 1950, tied with the winter of 1969/70 (our top analog year).


ROCHESTER, NEW YORK
Year
Average Temperature
1976/77
29.48
1993/94
30.38
1962/63
30.38
1981/82
31
1978/79
31.44
1969/70
31.56
2002/03
31.56

In Baltimore (BWI Airport), the winter ranked 3rd coldest behind 1976/77 and 1962/63.

BALTIMORE, MARYLAND
Year
Average Temperature
1976/77
37.04
1962/63
37.16
2002/03
38.63

What a difference a year can make. Many of these same locations during the same period last year found temperatures ranking among the warmest on record as resurgent solar activity produced a shrunken polar vortex and enhanced zonal flow, which in turn maximized the maritime influence on the continents and limited the extent of the snowcover. It also led to near record drought that lingered through the summer in many areas.

These two years demonstrate how many factors combine to choreograph the weather and climate as we march from season to season and year-to-year on our ride through time.


21 posted on 05/15/2003 12:06:36 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
They're about to drive me to global drinking.
22 posted on 05/15/2003 12:10:51 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Will Rogers never met me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
I guess it was a bad week to stop drinking. :)
23 posted on 05/15/2003 12:12:08 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ga Rob
I have a new youngster here at work who has only heard about the "calamity" of global warming. How the sky is falling and it's all SUV's fault. I don't have time to get into a full fledged discussion right now. Maybe this will hold him over for a bit.

The Global Warming crowd is doing a SCAM on all of us!

Send him to read from this collection of articles posted here on Free Republic:

Global Warming Hoax :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Global Warming Hoax , click below:
  click here >>> Global Warming Hoax <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



24 posted on 05/15/2003 12:13:09 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Wow...that is awesome. Thanks I'll be reading all these myself.
25 posted on 05/15/2003 12:17:54 PM PDT by Ga Rob ("Life's tough...it's even tougher when you're stupid"....The Duke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
shhhh. i never slowed down. shhhhh.
26 posted on 05/15/2003 12:29:49 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Will Rogers never met me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cogitator; Ga Rob

So this data can be used by both groups, as in "it's not warming very much" vs. "it's warming a lot more than they said two years ago".

Question has never been is it warming or cooling, the trend can be either both depending on your time frame.

Ice Ages & Astronomical Causes

The question's are quantitative, how much is due to mankind and under our control? And, is makind's impact sufficient to make a difference, if we were to change our techonolgies and economies sufficiently.

The answer for Greenhouse gases and the Greenhouse effect is clearly that mankind can affect the climate only negligibly, and it is even questionable if mankind could make a measureable difference in Climate at all:

Mankind's impact is only 0.28% of Total Greenhouse effect

for all emission control or other technical fixes politically feasible to apply:

" There is no dispute at all about the fact that even if punctiliously observed, (the Kyoto Protocol) would have an imperceptible effect on future temperatures -- one-twentieth of a degree by 2050. "

Dr. S. Fred Singer, atmospheric physicist


27 posted on 05/15/2003 12:35:10 PM PDT by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson