Artificial Life Experiments Show How Complex Functions Can Evolve

NSF ^ | May 8, 2003 | Staff

[AmericanAge]

Check their forums; it's been a while since I've been over there. I don't think they have a document on it, though.

Just because they do it doesn't mean that they evolved to do so. We don't need atheists like you here.

[Lurking Libertarian]

I have a question. Is there a conservative position on evolution?

If you follow these threads, you will see that there are quite a few of them.

[f.Christian]

aa ...

4. There is nothing good about evolution. Nothing evolves - period. Even diseases. It's all nonsense, as I just mentioned.





34 posted on 05/08/2003 10:48 AM PDT by AmericanAge


fC ...

What is really strange in our society and the FR ...

this gypsy cult of thieves have the reign of the store and shop too !

[donh]

Yeah, look at how accurate polls are, for one.

Polls are raw data, not statistics. Statistics is a formal mathematical discipline not normally considered in the least questionable. Algebra can't vouch for the data it is applied to, and neither can statistics.

[AmericanAge]

What, are you going to side with all of the God-haters too?

[webstersII]

"We don't need atheists like you here."

FR is a discussion place of ideas for EVERYONE to amiably explore concepts. Keep your exclusionary comments to yourself.

[Doctor Stochastic]

I'm printing the paper now. Will comment late this afternoon or tonight after reading.

[Right Wing Professor]

Fossils don't show ANY transitional species but maybe this computer program with fix that too.

Same old threads, same old lies.

[AmericanAge]

Fair enough.

But its surprising to see the number of atheists today.

[Right Wing Professor]

We don't need atheists like you here.

Get lost, newbie.

[donh]

Just because they do it doesn't mean that they evolved to do so.

And lacking evidence otherwise, that doesn't make it a poor bet that they didn't.

We don't need atheists like you here.

I'm not an athiest, and I belong here at least as much as someone who thinks statistics is a discredited science.

[AmericanAge]

"Polls are raw data, not statistics."

Yes, but polls are *statistics* applied on top of the raw data. And unless you're expecting that everyone who is lying, it's the "statistics" that are wrong. Just in the same way that they try to use statistics to "prove" evolution. It's all pseudoscience.

[f.Christian]

"FR anarcho-loons"

[AmericanAge]

"I'm not an atheist"

Then why are you supporting evolution? Do you not believe in the Bible?

[PatrickHenry]

I have a question. Is there a conservative position on evolution?

Indeed there is. It's the same as the conservative position on gravity. Or the solar system. Or relativity.

[elbucko]

If ya can't find the fossils, rig a computer program to "prove" your theory.

The fossils do exist. The evolution of the horse from a species of small, forest dwelling omnivores to a species of large plans dwelling herbivores is confirmed by the fossil record.

I don't have a problem with God using science to get us where he wants us to go. I am secure that the Almighty uses His many powers at hand to form Creation.

[donh]

I'd really prefer you didn't address your posts to
me--I really dislike your fragmented impersonation
of a skitzophrenic with Attention Deficit Disorder.

[AmericanAge]

You too?

Am I the only one here who actually cares what the bible has to say???

[AmericanAge]

That's not what the bible says. Read genesis. It's quite clear. And if you start saying "Well, that's just an analogy...", what parts of the bible CAN you believe?

[PatrickHenry]

Am I the only one here who actually cares what the bible has to say???

You're not alone in equating evolution with atheism. Many have that disorder, notwithstanding loads of testimony from theistic evolutionists to the contrary.