Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Love-struck Prince William eyes move to US: reports
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | May 5, 2003 | AFP

Posted on 05/05/2003 1:58:57 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Prince William, son of the late Princess Diana and heir to the British throne Prince Charles, wants to move to the United States after he finishes university in Scotland, a London newspaper said yesterday.

Meanwhile, newspapers also reported that William, 21 next month, has fallen in love with a female flatmate.

William "is determined to hold on to his privacy and believes living in the States gives him the best opportunity," a royal source told the Sunday Mirror tabloid.

A courtier said William, a student of art history at St Andrews University, wants to take either a post-graduate degree at a US college or a job with a US art auction house or gallery.

The courtier said New York was William's preferred choice of destination once he finishes university in Scotland in the summer of 2005.

"Various options are being discussed. It would be for a year or perhaps two... Like his mother, he wants his independence and is convinced the States will offer that to him," the courtier said.

The news came as British tabloids reported that William was dating fellow St Andrews' student Kate Middleton, 20.

Papers said William fell for the brunette after watching her at a university fashion show where she modelled a revealing lace dress.

"Wills thinks Kate is absolutely gorgeous," a friend of the pair was quoted as saying in The Mail on Sunday.

"They have a lot in common and they get on very well. They both love art and travelling and Kate has become a real confidante. They are certainly very close, but she's very discreet about William and he's very coy about her," the friend said.

Tabloids carried pictures of Kate and William being tactile while watching a university rugby match together on Saturday.

But Kate's father, company director Michael Middleton, said his daughter, who shares a flat with William and another male and female student, were "just good friends".

"We are very amused at the thought of being in-laws to Prince William, but I don't think it is going to happen," he told the Sunday Mirror.

Meanwhile, The People tabloid said William was planning a marathon drinking session with friends to celebrate his 21st birthday next month, after turning down the chance to have a big birthday concert in the grounds of Buckingham Palace.

AFP


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: JZoback
I am a monarchist, and I am neither liberal nor mentally ill. Monarchism transcends the artificial spectrum of left/center/right French democratic politics and champions the pre-Enlightenment model of a sacramental polity where allegiance is a matter of lifelong sworn personal loyalty rather than disposable alliances based upon shifting political winds.

A monarchy is the ultimate expression of private property: in a monarchy, the State is the personal fief (property) of the Crown, and the Sovereign has a natural interest in protecting, preserving, and improving that property. A popular government is the ultimate expression of public property: in a democracy or republic, the State is theoretically the property of the People as a whole, realistically the property of the representatives (or demagogues) who hold elective office at the whim of the voters and interest groups who elect them. Consequently, the people in day-to-day but temporary control of the state have no personal interest in its long-term well-being, and have a natural interest only in getting as much as they can during their stay in office.

It's like the difference in being a homeowner and being a renter: the homeowner takes better care of his property than a renter would because of the equity (vested interest) he has in that property; the renter, on the other hand, has no concern for the long-term well-being of the property, since he will not suffer if it declines in value.

21 posted on 05/05/2003 7:40:24 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
Can you blame him? Everyone wants to come to America!
22 posted on 05/05/2003 7:50:21 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
oh and your elite royalty who are sick of the job... Funny that just 227 years after we threw off the yoke of English royalty, a young English royal himself decides "hey, those Colonies might be a better place to hang out..."

I bet he's wrangling for a visit to the ranch. He doesn't want to wait around his whole life waiting for someone to die.

23 posted on 05/05/2003 7:53:06 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
It sounds like he has promise.
27 posted on 05/05/2003 8:04:13 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Well, he is welcome to come here. (All sorts *have* immigrated to the USA, after all.) But if he is going to apply for citizenship after seven years, he is gonna have ta ditch the title thingie. (Of course if he wants to get citizenship sooner, he could also join the Armed Forces -- but only as an enlisted man. You have to be an American citizen to be an officer.)
28 posted on 05/05/2003 8:05:03 AM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
"King of Kings"

It seems to me that this designation implies that He is supposed to have earthly kings under Him. No one has ever sung praises to the "President of Presidents."
29 posted on 05/05/2003 8:05:45 AM PDT by royalcello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: No Truce With Kings
Bump!
30 posted on 05/05/2003 8:08:03 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: royalcello
English royalty was no "yoke."

Read this from Declaration of Independence.

The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers. He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world: For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

32 posted on 05/05/2003 8:13:26 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Meanwhile, The People tabloid said William was planning a marathon drinking session with friends to celebrate his 21st birthday next month, after turning down the chance to have a big birthday concert in the grounds of Buckingham Palace.

Sounds good!

34 posted on 05/05/2003 8:14:50 AM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
There's nothing in the article to suggest that HRH has any intention of immigrating to the U.S. (impossible for someone in his position) or staying here for more than a few years. Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden went to Yale and lived briefly in New York, but is now back in Sweden and has every intention of fulfilling her duties as future Queen. Prince William probably has similiar ideas, if this article is correct (which it might not be).
35 posted on 05/05/2003 8:14:55 AM PDT by royalcello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
Well, obviously I don't agree that the question of monarchy was "dispelled" by the Declaration of Independence, and I'm sure FR's many Catholics would take issue with your comments about the Protestant "Reformation." I happen to love those "medieval notions" and will defend them for the rest of my life.

As for classical music, there's a lot more to it than radio. What about live music? America's symphony orchestras are in severe trouble--here in Miami the Florida Philharmonic is about to go bankrupt, and the Legislature's plan to cut all arts funding doesn't help. I wish that arts organizations could support themselves via the free market, but it's not happening, because most Americans aren't interested. That's why the government has to pitch in.
38 posted on 05/05/2003 8:22:37 AM PDT by royalcello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
Royalty, much like a sacerdotal priesthood, carries with it the implication that all men are NOT created equal. It posits that some people are, by accident of their birth, on a higher plane or somehow closer to divinity than others.

  1. "Sacerdotal priesthood" is a redundancy.
  2. To pretend that Catholicism claims that priests are priests "by accident of birth" is both silly and false.
  3. The idea that clerics are necessarily "closer to divinity than others" is also both silly and false, not to mention unbiblical. (Was Elijah a priest? Isaiah? But was not the Israelite priesthood divinely established?)

40 posted on 05/05/2003 8:23:36 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson