Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. slaps preliminary duties on Canadian wheat exports
The Globe and Mail ^ | 5-3-03

Posted on 05/04/2003 6:44:19 AM PDT by mikenola

WASHINGTON and OTTAWA -- The United States has ratcheted up its assault on the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) by slapping preliminary duties as high as 8.15 per cent on $400-million worth of Canadian wheat it claims is being dumped across the border.

As with numerous other high-profile disputes with its largest trading partner, Ottawa vowed to vigorously fight yesterday's U.S. Commerce Department decision, which pushes interim duties on Canadian wheat to more than 12 per cent.

Ralph Goodale, the minister responsible for the CWB, said the duties are part of a pattern of "trade harassment" by the U.S. government, and that Canada would challenge them at the World Trade Organization if they aren't removed.

"Obviously there is a very significant level of frustration here," Mr. Goodale told reporters in Ottawa yesterday.

"At some point, the harassment should end."

The U.S. move comes less than two months after the Commerce Department hit the same products with a 3.96-per-cent duty, alleging that Canadian wheat is illegally subsidized.

The latest duties -- 8.15 per cent on durum wheat and 6.12 per cent on hard red spring wheat -- are aimed at offsetting U.S. allegations that the CWB is selling Canadian wheat in the U.S. market at less than fair value. The offence is known as dumping.

Durum wheat is widely used to make pasta, while spring wheat is used for baked goods such as bread and bagels.

If the duties are allowed to stand, Canadian wheat could be priced out of the U.S. market, and other buyers may be tough to find, Canadian officials said.

The CWB is the exclusive seller of Western Canadian wheat on world markets, and the U.S. government has vowed to dismantle it and other so-called state trading enterprises during global talks.

The CWB must immediately post bonds to cover the cost of the duties. It would not have to start paying the U.S. government in full unless they are made final by the Commerce Department in mid-July and then blessed by the U.S. International Trade Commission roughly a month later. Both outcomes are considered probable.

Canadian officials did take some comfort that the duties are much lower than the punishing 30- to 45-per-cent levies sought by U.S. wheat farmers.

"It says something about the strength of the allegations when the arithmetic keeps coming out at such a low level," Mr. Goodale said.

U.S. wheat farmers and their political allies in Congress hailed the preliminary duties as vindication of their long-standing complaints about the marketing practices of the CWB.

North Dakota Senator Byron Dorgan said wheat farmers had provided the Commerce Department with "clear, substantial and credible evidence" of dumping.

"There are rules that apply to U.S.-Canada trade and they need to be followed," Mr. Dorgan said. "When they are not observed, it is not only appropriate but required that the Commerce Department step in, call the foul, blow the whistle and stop the violations."

Officials of the North Dakota Wheat Commission, which filed the complaint that led to the duties, complained that illegal Canadian imports had already cost farmers $1.1-billion in lost sales.

"Until the government of Canada opens the procurement and trade of wheat in Canada to free-market competition and eliminates its export subsidization practices, the United States cannot let unfair trade practices destroy our hard red spring and durum wheat production industries," said Larry Lee, a wheat farmer from Velva, N.D., and commission chairman.

He warned that U.S. milling and pasta makers are already "dangerously reliant" on Canadian wheat.

Exports to the United States for about 10 per cent of the CWB's total sales, or $400-million (Canadian).

CWB chairman Ken Ritter denied that Canada dumps its wheat in anyone's market.

"We don't need to. We produce some of the world's highest-quality grain, for which our American customers have testified they are willing to pay a premium."

Canadian officials also criticized the sampling method used by the U.S. Commerce Department to calculate the dumping duties, noting that it's based on data from just 27 Canadian farmers.

"So far all we have got from the United States are the anecdotes from the coffee shop in Minot [North Dakota] and with the greatest of respect, that's no basis on which to maintain a trading relationship," Mr. Goodale said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: tarriff; wheat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 05/04/2003 6:44:19 AM PDT by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mikenola
I can't imagine what is causing problems.
2 posted on 05/04/2003 6:46:58 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Well, the steel dumping that Russia did certainly hurt our market. I guess we could just keep our own wheat instead of sending it overseas? You econs out there could probably explain this.
3 posted on 05/04/2003 6:48:39 AM PDT by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
If they do not like our prices, go elsewhere, France and Germany would love to have socialist grain.
4 posted on 05/04/2003 6:49:30 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Farmers in Canada admit they've sold directly and skirted regs. I have no idea the amount.I think we will have to see.
5 posted on 05/04/2003 7:06:24 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: kpml
Sure do know that. I wish Bush would get us out of the farm business.
7 posted on 05/04/2003 7:11:03 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kpml
By the way, I am conservative, not pub or dem. They are close enough in policy to be twins, cant tell em apart.
8 posted on 05/04/2003 7:12:43 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Check out the posts this guy has made..
9 posted on 05/04/2003 7:12:44 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
World Trade Organization dumps on country's farmers

China Rivals World's Top Corn Exporters

10 posted on 05/04/2003 7:15:11 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: mikenola
YO mapleleafs, looks like you can wilt in your socialist idealism....Boohooo ha ha
12 posted on 05/04/2003 7:54:43 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kpml
Get over yourself,troll.
13 posted on 05/04/2003 7:57:41 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kpml
Farm subsidies and price supports are not corporate welfare.
Rather, they are a necessary intervention in the agricultural market to assure an abundant and reliable food supply. Previous experience with laissez-faire agriculture production has taught us that it is a natural feast or famine cycle. It is in our national interest (as it is for all nations) to bring production stability to this market so that it more closely matches the constant demand for food.
14 posted on 05/04/2003 8:06:28 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Willie Green
Farm subsidies and price supports are not corporate welfare. Rather, they are a necessary intervention in the agricultural market to assure an abundant and reliable food supply

My BS meter is going off the chart

16 posted on 05/04/2003 8:37:43 AM PDT by CanadianFella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kpml
you are full of it

Abandoning your faux pleasantries when confronted with economic reality?
How characteristicly "liberal" of you!

Frankly, it is in every nation's best self-interest to be as independent and self-sufficient at food production as their own natural resources and climate permit. Those who would undermine another nation's food supply, be it for political or financial gain, are truly despicable.

17 posted on 05/04/2003 8:47:33 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CanadianFella
My BS meter is going off the chart

That's because you're incapable of refuting economic reality as well.

18 posted on 05/04/2003 8:50:02 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CanadianFella
Health care subsidies and price supports are not socialism.
Rather, they are a necessary intervention in the medical market to assure an abundant and reliable health care supply. Previous experience with laissez-faire health care production has taught us that it is a natural feast or famine cycle. It is in our national interest (as it is for all nations) to bring production stability to this market so that it more closely matches the constant demand for health care.


19 posted on 05/04/2003 8:50:53 AM PDT by freeforall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I dunno Willie, I'm split on this one.

On one hand, I understand Bush's reasoning on the wheat and steel tarrifs from a national security perspective.

On the other, I can see negative consequences of tarriffs on ancillary industries. We here in New Orleans are taking a big bite in the butt from the steel tarrif, due to the lost off traffic through the port of New Orleans.

Seems to me though that farm subsidies are another issue entirely. Considering the massive amount of cash piped into these programs, i think we are doing a disservice to the agriculture industry, by giving individual farmers little incentive to minimize costs and become competitive.

Bottom line, I'd go with using tarrifs to discourage dumping, but scale back the subsidy program, which you gotta admit has been a vote getter for many administrations.
20 posted on 05/04/2003 8:58:30 AM PDT by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson