Skip to comments.
U.S. slaps preliminary duties on Canadian wheat exports
The Globe and Mail ^
| 5-3-03
Posted on 05/04/2003 6:44:19 AM PDT by mikenola
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
05/04/2003 6:44:19 AM PDT
by
mikenola
To: mikenola
I can't imagine what is causing problems.
2
posted on
05/04/2003 6:46:58 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: mikenola
Well, the steel dumping that Russia did certainly hurt our market. I guess we could just keep our own wheat instead of sending it overseas? You econs out there could probably explain this.
To: mikenola
If they do not like our prices, go elsewhere, France and Germany would love to have socialist grain.
4
posted on
05/04/2003 6:49:30 AM PDT
by
cynicom
To: cynicom
Farmers in Canada admit they've sold directly and skirted regs. I have no idea the amount.I think we will have to see.
5
posted on
05/04/2003 7:06:24 AM PDT
by
MEG33
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: kpml
Sure do know that. I wish Bush would get us out of the farm business.
7
posted on
05/04/2003 7:11:03 AM PDT
by
cynicom
To: kpml
By the way, I am conservative, not pub or dem. They are close enough in policy to be twins, cant tell em apart.
8
posted on
05/04/2003 7:12:43 AM PDT
by
cynicom
To: cynicom
Check out the posts this guy has made..
9
posted on
05/04/2003 7:12:44 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: cynicom
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: mikenola
YO mapleleafs, looks like you can wilt in your socialist idealism....Boohooo ha ha
To: kpml
Get over yourself,troll.
13
posted on
05/04/2003 7:57:41 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: kpml
Farm subsidies and price supports are not corporate welfare.
Rather, they are a necessary intervention in the agricultural market to assure an abundant and reliable food supply. Previous experience with laissez-faire agriculture production has taught us that it is a natural feast or famine cycle. It is in our national interest (as it is for all nations) to bring production stability to this market so that it more closely matches the constant demand for food.
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Willie Green
Farm subsidies and price supports are not corporate welfare. Rather, they are a necessary intervention in the agricultural market to assure an abundant and reliable food supply My BS meter is going off the chart
To: kpml
you are full of itAbandoning your faux pleasantries when confronted with economic reality?
How characteristicly "liberal" of you!
Frankly, it is in every nation's best self-interest to be as independent and self-sufficient at food production as their own natural resources and climate permit. Those who would undermine another nation's food supply, be it for political or financial gain, are truly despicable.
To: CanadianFella
My BS meter is going off the chartThat's because you're incapable of refuting economic reality as well.
To: CanadianFella
Health care subsidies and price supports are not socialism.
Rather, they are a necessary intervention in the medical market to assure an abundant and reliable health care supply. Previous experience with laissez-faire health care production has taught us that it is a natural feast or famine cycle. It is in our national interest (as it is for all nations) to bring production stability to this market so that it more closely matches the constant demand for health care.
To: Willie Green
I dunno Willie, I'm split on this one.
On one hand, I understand Bush's reasoning on the wheat and steel tarrifs from a national security perspective.
On the other, I can see negative consequences of tarriffs on ancillary industries. We here in New Orleans are taking a big bite in the butt from the steel tarrif, due to the lost off traffic through the port of New Orleans.
Seems to me though that farm subsidies are another issue entirely. Considering the massive amount of cash piped into these programs, i think we are doing a disservice to the agriculture industry, by giving individual farmers little incentive to minimize costs and become competitive.
Bottom line, I'd go with using tarrifs to discourage dumping, but scale back the subsidy program, which you gotta admit has been a vote getter for many administrations.
20
posted on
05/04/2003 8:58:30 AM PDT
by
mikenola
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson