THE FINAL SECRET OF 9/11

Antiwar.com ^ | 4/28/03 | Justin Raimondo

[Lucy Lake]

Read Comment # 24

[cardinal4]

I cant answer, I dont think the report will be truthful or complete.

[sauropod]

Am here to serve.

BTW, i need a current e-addy for Carol. The one i have bounces.

[Revel]

"There are no antiwar Republicans."

Actually he would have chosen his name...not for this war, but for the one that Clinton logged for political reasons back at that time. Remember that? There were plenty here...even at FR who were opposed to that war.

This old site is still up and going. It was a diary account of a young girl(Previous exchange student in America) who was living in Serbia at the time.

http://www.wardiary.com/

[Miss Antiwar]

I am through attempting to converse with you...........

[FreeReign]

Newsweek: Unlike Graham, Goss insists there are no political “gotchas” in the report, only a large volume of important information about the performance and shortcomings of U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement agencies prior to September 11.

Goss is really not Graham's ally. The Newsweek article is BS.

[sauropod]

Horse or a cow?

[Miss Antiwar]

I cant answer, I dont think the report will be truthful or complete.

-Bravo Cardinal, an honest answer!

[Howlin]

Why is this tripe on FR?

Reread this thread. There are people here DYING for this to be true! And will tell more people that liberals EVER could.

[1rudeboy]

I don't know what set him off, but my understanding is that he finally imploded.

[Miss Antiwar]

Just like Clarity?

[Teetop]

Be that way, you are the one acting childish with all of this, "I want it AND I want IT NOW" talk....


Obviously you want a half done report that is incomplete AND probably incorrect NOW, instead of waiting for a complete AND correct report. I'm willing to wait, you're not, so be it....build a bridge.

[cardinal4]

-Bravo Cardinal, an honest answer!

Im being serous here, I dont believe the report will be honest or complete. I think we are getting up in arms about a report that is gonna say "Oswald did it, and he acted alone". Because there is too much blame to go around. I think its release is mistake because it wont be truthful.

[sauropod]

Precisely what is your FR history? and who TF are u anyhow?

[Shermy]

No one thought about the plot to use knives, psychologically allaying the fears of the passengers with words about "demands" to be made sounding like your usual hijack, then crashing the planes into buildings.

It was a devilishly clever plan, understanding "the enemy" and its expectations. Can't work again, and failed on the fourth airplane due to cell phone communications.

Also there is the CYA side. On one side no one wants to admit mistakes and incompetence. On another side, mistakes and incompetence are dismissed because it doesn't confirm greater conspiracies. The latter often puff their arguments with according perfect and great knowledge and powers to the CIA, etc.

There are "conspiracies" but many events attributed to such are better explained IMO by analysis of incompetence and screw ups.

[Howlin]

ROFLMAO!

[finnman69]

antiwar Republican


a better name for you would be:

Cowardly Traitor.

[Teetop]

"Im being serous here, I dont believe the report will be honest or complete."

I happen to agree, from what you said before as well. The need to know outweighs many things...even the public's "need to know".

[finnman69]

What? All the antiwar fools showing up in one spot?

[quidnunc]

Tell Justin/Dennis/John Roy Carlson/Lawrence Dennis that quidnunc says "Hey".